Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
2 decades, no warming
But add in Mann's tree rings and the "Warming" on the ocean 700m deep and presto!
In any event, where's the lab work showing that the 2PPM of CO2 we added last year is responsible for the 2014 warming?
2 decades, no warming
But add in Mann's tree rings and the "Warming" on the ocean 700m deep and presto!
In any event, where's the lab work showing that the 2PPM of CO2 we added last year is responsible for the 2014 warming?
Another false comment
Nine of the 10 warmest years since 1880 have all occurred in the 21st century, with 1998 now ranked as the fourth warmest year on record, the experts said.
2014 the hottest year since records began climate experts confirm - Climate Change - Environment - The Independent
Just can't accept the truth...
All the hottest years have been in the last 14...DUH
http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&ct2=us/0_0_s_1_1_a&sa=t&usg=AFQjCNGTULdkn9hZJ8-gwwEUSQ9trUFiXw&cid=52778713258270&url=http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/17/science/earth/2014-was-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2010.html&ei=aji5VKjLKI7Bggfez4HQDA&sig2=f_bqEX53d3WfY-t-T990LA&rt=HOMEPAGE&vm=STANDARD&bvm=section&did=-8032531748191703895&ssid=h
Hottest year???????????
In the Midwest we had the coldest November in decades!
November 2014 Shattered Cold and Snow Records For Some
http://www.weather.com/storms/winter/news/november-2014-cold-snow-records-us
And if people will remember, last winter was a HARD ONE!
Winter 2014 set to be 'coldest for century' Britain faces ARCTIC FREEZE in just weeks
Winter 2014 to be COLDEST of century UK faces arctic weather freeze in November Nature News Daily Express
Hottest ever, my foot.
You are smoking something!
Countering a statement on climate with a rebuttal about weather is not very convincing.
If you have some good, peer-reviewed science, I'd LOVE to look at it.
OMG that is such a BS argument. Whose climate has changed? And if you are able to name any tell us what in their climate changed.
My personal opinion is that we need an effort - a public-private partnership kinda like NASA and the moon landing project. We didn't have the technology to do THAT when we committed to it.
Nope, mom passed away in '66. Believe what? Climate change, you know - what the thread is all about.And your mom told you to say that?The world will have to look like the set of "Waterworld" before the GOP will believe. Then they'll blame it all on Obama.
Belive what? that people like yourself repeat the stupidest shit ever?
My personal opinion is that we need an effort - a public-private partnership kinda like NASA and the moon landing project. We didn't have the technology to do THAT when we committed to it.
How would you like to be the company that invents the technology that allows coal to be burnt without the emission problems? How much would China pay for that equipment? Jobs here. Exports. Win win.
Fuel cells. We should OWN the world markets for technology in the fields of all sorts of energy sources of the future.
Instead we learned to waste billions of gallons of fresh water on fracking.
NASA produced so much spinoff economic growth it's UNBELIEABLE.
We could increase that economic benefit by 1000 times with real significant energy breakthroughs.
More government control inevitably leads to the loss of rights, be it property rights as in New York where the Governor has banned Fracking, or other rights.
If what you do on your property has an adverse affect on your neighbor (and on HIS property rights) then we have to find a balance between the rights of both.
Yes, I know the claim was about Fracking's risk to the water bearing strata as well as surface water, but its an open fact that the the real opposition is based on AGW. You can do fracking in such a way as to mitigate the other issues, but AGW idiots don't want to hear it. So basically a NYC politician basically told upstate landowners to basically go fuck themselves.
You are asking people to make assumptions here based on no evidence but your opinion. I find that often when posters say things like "common knowledge" and "open fact" is really means "accept what I am saying without any supporting documentation. Maybe you are convinced and you get to pick and choose what evidence you use to reach your conclusions. Others are free to use different criteria if THEY choose.
But whatever motivations you attribute to whoever - the fact remains that sometimes rights collide - often when that happens the people we have elected have to weigh the competing interests and make a call. If they make that decision based on the best information available, then that's about the best we can hope for.
So basically roll over, and let government fuck you up the ass.
Great.
Not the approach I would suggest.
I haven't trusted the U.S. government to "get it right" for quite some time now.
I do think folks need to educate themselves with the best information available and then hold our governments feet to the fire to make the best decisions on our behalf. I do NOT believe that includes artificially jacking up energy costs on people who are already struggling, just to try to make it more expensive so they will use less.
My personal opinion is that we need an effort - a public-private partnership kinda like NASA and the moon landing project. We didn't have the technology to do THAT when we committed to it. In that same vein, I think we need to commit to a huge private-public partnership on energy and energy technology. I think that's our best bet to come up with a sustainable and affordable energy future.
And all the hyper-partisan rhetoric and lies from BOTH sides is not going to help make that happen. It is going to make it damn near impossible. So if this information IS correct, buy a snorkle.
My personal opinion is that we need an effort - a public-private partnership kinda like NASA and the moon landing project. We didn't have the technology to do THAT when we committed to it.
How would you like to be the company that invents the technology that allows coal to be burnt without the emission problems? How much would China pay for that equipment? Jobs here. Exports. Win win.
Fuel cells. We should OWN the world markets for technology in the fields of all sorts of energy sources of the future.
Instead we learned to waste billions of gallons of fresh water on fracking.
"the record" goes a lot further back than 150 years
All the hottest years have been in the last 14...DUH
http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=...D&bvm=section&did=-8032531748191703895&ssid=h
"the record" goes a lot further back than 150 years
No it doesn't. Looks like someone needs some education again.
