jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,601
- 30,070
- 2,180
I never asked it to do so. Humans burning fossil fuels is unprecedented. Did you fail to note that or do you disagree?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never asked it to do so. Humans burning fossil fuels is unprecedented. Did you fail to note that or do you disagree?
If we are lucky, it will be AGW vs deniers. Can't wait!Careful what you say about Dr. Mann - he fights for truth, justice, and the American way.That's funny. Steven Goddard (your source) has found a way to show a declining trend from data he knows proves the opposite.Oh nooeessss!!1!!1!!!!!! We're all going to boil away due to Global Warming.
Not.
SCIENTISTS (from the government!), and we all know how much the Progs love to quote SCIENTISTS, have determined that the USA is having the Coolest Year on Record in 2014.
View attachment 33385
The percentage of US HCN stations to reach 90 degrees was the smallest on record this year, with four of the five coolest years occurring above 350 PPM CO2. The most widespread heat occurred in 1931, when more than 98% of stations were over 90 degrees.
NOAA s National Weather Service
HCN:
The Historical Climate Network (HCN) was identified in response to the need for the most accurate, unbiased, modern historical climate record available for detecting climate change in the US over the past 100 years or more, The HCN is a sub-network of Cooperative Observer Network (COOP) consisting of 1221 stations. The HCN stations are maintained by the NOAA’s NWS and the HCN data set is maintained by NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). The HCN-M will sustain the Nation’s regional climate record through modernization of the HCN.
NOAA s National Weather Service
Removing Half Of All HCN Stations Has Essentially No Impact On The US Temperature Real Science
And yet you trust made up models by Michael Mann....go figure.
"In January 2014 District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Weisberg found that Dr. Mann's lawsuit should not be dismissed pursuant to the District Of Columbia's Anti-SLAPP statute. Accusing a scientist of conducting his research fraudulently is a factual allegation that can be proven true or false, not mere hyperbolic opinionating. If it is false it is defamatory, and if it is made with actual malice it is actionable."
Yeah, sure he does!Careful what you say about Dr. Mann - he fights for truth,
That's the beauty of it; we'll have our Scopes Monkey Trial! It'll be the Scientists vs the Deniers! And we'll have our answer.If we are lucky, it will be AGW vs deniers. Can't wait!Careful what you say about Dr. Mann - he fights for truth, justice, and the American way.That's funny. Steven Goddard (your source) has found a way to show a declining trend from data he knows proves the opposite.
Removing Half Of All HCN Stations Has Essentially No Impact On The US Temperature Real Science
And yet you trust made up models by Michael Mann....go figure.
"In January 2014 District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Weisberg found that Dr. Mann's lawsuit should not be dismissed pursuant to the District Of Columbia's Anti-SLAPP statute. Accusing a scientist of conducting his research fraudulently is a factual allegation that can be proven true or false, not mere hyperbolic opinionating. If it is false it is defamatory, and if it is made with actual malice it is actionable."
Yeah, sure he does!Careful what you say about Dr. Mann - he fights for truth,
AGW vs. Deniers
AGW will ALWAYS LOSE.
Why? Because lies and misinformation will NEVER beat cold, hard facts.
I never asked it to do so. Humans burning fossil fuels is unprecedented. Did you fail to note that or do you disagree?