20 extra votes were mistakenly given to Romney

R

rdean

Guest
article-2082977-0F5A67D900000578-117_306x423.jpg


This concerned Mr True, who said he uncovered a major flaw in the count and the GOP county leader didn't seem to care.
The GOP chairman in Iowa, Matt Strawn, said in a statement that state party officials have no reason to believe the final results from Appanoose County will change the outcome of the vote.

In terms of his own candidate preference, Mr True backs Ron Paul, who came in third place in the caucuses.

Did Rick Santorum actually WIN in Iowa? Concerns raised after man claims 20 extra votes mistakenly given to Mitt Romney

Interesting
 
People aren't screaming fraud because regardless who won, they both get the same amount of delegates. Yes, it's concerning if there was a miscount. But this error wont change the effects of the delagate count.
 
article-2082977-0F5A67D900000578-117_306x423.jpg


This concerned Mr True, who said he uncovered a major flaw in the count and the GOP county leader didn't seem to care.
The GOP chairman in Iowa, Matt Strawn, said in a statement that state party officials have no reason to believe the final results from Appanoose County will change the outcome of the vote.

In terms of his own candidate preference, Mr True backs Ron Paul, who came in third place in the caucuses.

Did Rick Santorum actually WIN in Iowa? Concerns raised after man claims 20 extra votes mistakenly given to Mitt Romney

Interesting

Hey with the Hawkeye--Cockeye--where anyone can register as a Republican and vote at the same time--who CARES what the final score was. It's all screwed up anything and is in no way any reflection of what other "REAL" primary ballot states are going to do. To add only 4% of the entire population of Iowa participated.
 
Last edited:
Is that a paper bag? WTF kind of vote did these people have? A show of paws?
 
wow its just so surprizing the republicans would cheat in an election.

NOT
 
People aren't screaming fraud because regardless who won, they both get the same amount of delegates. Yes, it's concerning if there was a miscount. But this error wont change the effects of the delagate count.

So essentially, Romney gets only 24% of the vote in Iowa, he'll get maybe 40% in New Hampshire provided Newt doesn't rip him up too bad tonight in the debates, and then he'll get maybe 35% in SC, and the GOP Establishment will declare him "the winner".

No, really. That's the plan.

Then Obama will will unload on this guy full bore, and he'll lose bigger than McCain.

In related news, unemployment dipped to 8.5 and 200K jobs were added in December.
 
People aren't screaming fraud because regardless who won, they both get the same amount of delegates. Yes, it's concerning if there was a miscount. But this error wont change the effects of the delagate count.

So essentially, Romney gets only 24% of the vote in Iowa, he'll get maybe 40% in New Hampshire provided Newt doesn't rip him up too bad tonight in the debates, and then he'll get maybe 35% in SC, and the GOP Establishment will declare him "the winner".

No, really. That's the plan.

Then Obama will will unload on this guy full bore, and he'll lose bigger than McCain.

In related news, unemployment dipped to 8.5 and 200K jobs were added in December.

Yesterday I was talking to a guy who got a new job in Dec but he said the future wasn't looking to good, Christmas tree sales had really dipped.
 
Sheesh.. all that money wasted for 25 Republican delegates to the Republican convention.

Then again, Obama can blow that much of the taxpayers money on a night out with Michele... just sayin..
 
Lumpy why are you lying about whats in that link?

I'm not lying, if you don't want voter ID then your left open to ineligible voting, right.?

and as a rule Democrats don't want voter ID, correct?

So therefore answer the question...or not.. just play your race card I guess..
 

Forum List

Back
Top