Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 131,352
- 25,621
- 2,180
I was born in 1962.
I see nothing good about that year~
Well, that was cheerful!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was born in 1962.
I see nothing good about that year~
No, no, no, no, no..................that leaves out what happened in 1964 on the Ed Sullivan show.
Drug use during those years was virtually non-existent.
That is not correct.
Only for the super-rich. We need the same progressive tax structure today to make up for the past three decadesPolio, Korea, McCarthy, the bomb, then the H BOMB! Apartheid, unsafe motor vehicles, unsafe cigarette ads, leaded gasoline and other uncontrolled pollution....
Ah, the good ole days!
Not to mention the near 90% tax brackets.
I was born in 1962.
I see nothing good about that year~
Well, that was cheerful!
no cellphones for one.
no drug use
just goodness - except for civil rights butt hose were being addressed.
Bob, just look at how hard it is to buck the tide right now. As a personal position, I voted Goldwater in 1964, and was so opposed to medicare and the Great Society programs of Johnson I considered moving to Australia.
1946 to 1962 were the best years that ever were or ever will be
you didnt have to have hassle caps "for your protection" to pry off with a srewdriver on over-the-counter bottles of aspirin during the1950s.................
or seals over fucking Chapstick
No Drug Use!no cellphones for one.
no drug use
just goodness - except for civil rights butt hose were being addressed.
fora ll practicall purposes drug use in the 50s was non-existent
That is not correct.
It is correct - drug use in the50s was virtually non-existent.
I hada 28 inch waist - hollywood good looks when I was 19 - no brag -fact....................................