13 Year Old Boy Getting Chemo After All

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by random3434, May 26, 2009.

  1. random3434
    Offline

    random3434 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    25,903
    Thanks Received:
    7,186
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +7,195
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,748
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,749
    The boy will probaly live now.

    Of course, the courts may remove him from his family.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Zoom-boing
    Offline

    Zoom-boing Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    25,485
    Thanks Received:
    7,368
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    East Japip
    Ratings:
    +10,664
    Glad the parents decided to do the chemo. Hope he beats it.
     
  4. OneThunder
    Offline

    OneThunder Rookie

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    22
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +2
    I believe the ruling sets a precedent on the road we don't want to go down.
    Granted, the chemo treatment has an 80-90% sauces rate, however, other cancer survival rates are not as generous. Do we want the courts to direct medical treatment?
     
  5. Yurt
    Offline

    Yurt Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Messages:
    25,594
    Thanks Received:
    3,559
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Hot air ballon
    Ratings:
    +5,062
    does the boy want treatment and his parents are denying treatment? if the boy does not want treatment, what gives the state the right to force treatment?
     
  6. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    50,937
    Thanks Received:
    12,590
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +27,766

    It said in the article that the parents keep changing their minds but that the kid didn't like chemo. If he doesn't like this round of chemo everyone is afraid that he will bolt again.

    There was a tumor that had grown and is causing him some pain. A 10 on a scale of 1-10. That's why they brought him back this time.
     
  7. OneThunder
    Offline

    OneThunder Rookie

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    22
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +2
    From my reading, the boy had one treatment and it made him very sick. He threaten to "kick and punch" if he had to undergo another treatment. His parents sought out alternative medicine for his condition. I'm not sure who took it to court (physicians?) but he is now required to undergo more chemo. The boy threatened to run away so his mother took him "on the run". There is much speculation on where they were going, but they came back.
     
  8. Yurt
    Offline

    Yurt Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Messages:
    25,594
    Thanks Received:
    3,559
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Hot air ballon
    Ratings:
    +5,062
    should the state have the power to force someone to undergo chemo therapy?
     
  9. plt42
    Offline

    plt42 A Constitutionalist

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Gulf Coast of Texas
    Ratings:
    +40
    I agree. This is not a precedent we want to set. Giving authority to legislate treatment could lead to that same authority denying treatment.

    I don't think this will end with the young man getting the prescribed chemotherapy. Consider... if he dies, will the state file a wrongful death suit against the parents for delaying the treatments? If he lives, will child-welfare remove him from the home of "unfit parents".
     
  10. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    73,795
    Thanks Received:
    8,742
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +15,192
    The boy doesnt want chemo. Why is it good that he is being forced to get it?

    If he wants to pursue alternatives, why shouldnt he?
     

Share This Page