Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
quotesdata melts ice who knew!
90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since we've measured it....
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...ns-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
So, yeah, that's why the sea levels are dropping, not rising.... while the wealthy warmers buy up beach front property hand over fist...
The evidence that AGW is a huge con just keeps rolling in:
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century
The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.
The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
If Trump won't demand the DOJ prosecute the "warmers" with the case Obama hid in 2012, Trump is a completely useless fraud. Those indictments should be coming out very soon, and if they don't, it will prove Trump is a disaster.
Stalin also prosecuted scientists for doing good science that was inconvenient to TheParty.
LaDexter is exactly like the Stalinists, as are most denier cultists.
Liberals settled it.....you must not have been important enough to get the memo....Science is never settled?You mean he denies settled science....any scientist does.....
He could never settle science like you fascists mastered.....If Trump won't demand the DOJ prosecute the "warmers" with the case Obama hid in 2012, Trump is a completely useless fraud. Those indictments should be coming out very soon, and if they don't, it will prove Trump is a disaster.
Stalin also prosecuted scientists for doing good science that was inconvenient to TheParty.
LaDexter is exactly like the Stalinists, as are most denier cultists.
Anyone with half a brain knows man made global warming is a hoax..but I must give Al Gore credit the tree huggers fell for it 100%
The reality is that the so-called "climate scientists" have been trying to prosecute their critics. Michael Mann filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn for ridiculing his AGW claims.
16 state Attorney Generals are trying to prosecute any organization that questions the AGW cult.
It's hilarious watching douche bags like you acting like you're some kind of persecuted class.
Wasn't weather supposed to have destroyed us...err...I mean climate change...err..I mean MMGW...err...I mean hurricanes....Anyone with half a brain knows man made global warming is a hoax..but I must give Al Gore credit the tree huggers fell for it 100%
Gore made big bucks on the scam. He lives like a king due to the stupidity of all these dumbass Moon Bats that bought the scam hook, line and sinker.
Dr. Hockey Stick Mann is a fraud.....and the State Penn has a history of moselting children....The reality is that the so-called "climate scientists" have been trying to prosecute their critics. Michael Mann filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn for ridiculing his AGW claims.
Don't lie. Steyn didn't just criticize science. He repeatedly called Dr. Mann a fraud, will the full knowledge he was lying about that, and repeatedly compared Dr. Mann to a child molester. That's libel.
16 state Attorney Generals are trying to prosecute any organization that questions the AGW cult.
I haven't heard that particular conspiracy theory before. Can you point out where I can read about it?
It's hilarious watching douche bags like you acting like you're some kind of persecuted class.
I've recently received three death threats here, all from hardcore Trump-fans/deniers (same group, always). And no denier was willing to condemn the people making those death threats.
All the violence and censorship is on your side. If you're not making the threats, you're standing silent while your fellows make them, and thus you're enabling them.
The reality is that the so-called "climate scientists" have been trying to prosecute their critics. Michael Mann filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn for ridiculing his AGW claims.
Don't lie. Steyn didn't just criticize science. He repeatedly called Dr. Mann a fraud, will the full knowledge he was lying about that, and repeatedly compared Dr. Mann to a child molester. That's libel.
16 state Attorney Generals are trying to prosecute any organization that questions the AGW cult.
I haven't heard that particular conspiracy theory before. Can you point out where I can read about it?
It's hilarious watching douche bags like you acting like you're some kind of persecuted class.
I've recently received three death threats here, all from hardcore Trump-fans/deniers (same group, always). And no denier was willing to condemn the people making those death threats.
All the violence and censorship is on your side. If you're not making the threats, you're standing silent while your fellows make them, and thus you're enabling them.
The reality is that the so-called "climate scientists" have been trying to prosecute their critics. Michael Mann filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn for ridiculing his AGW claims.
Don't lie. Steyn didn't just criticize science. He repeatedly called Dr. Mann a fraud, will the full knowledge he was lying about that, and repeatedly compared Dr. Mann to a child molester. That's libel.
16 state Attorney Generals are trying to prosecute any organization that questions the AGW cult.
I haven't heard that particular conspiracy theory before. Can you point out where I can read about it?
I've received some threats myself, and as we've seen in the news, all claims about Trump supporters threatening Hillary supporters have turned out to be fake. Trump supporters have been the targets of threats far more often than any credible threats against Trump opponents.It's hilarious watching douche bags like you acting like you're some kind of persecuted class.
I've recently received three death threats here, all from hardcore Trump-fans/deniers (same group, always). And no denier was willing to condemn the people making those death threats.
All the violence and censorship is on your side. If you're not making the threats, you're standing silent while your fellows make them, and thus you're enabling them.
The reality is that the so-called "climate scientists" have been trying to prosecute their critics. Michael Mann filed a lawsuit against Mark Steyn for ridiculing his AGW claims.
Don't lie. Steyn didn't just criticize science. He repeatedly called Dr. Mann a fraud, will the full knowledge he was lying about that, and repeatedly compared Dr. Mann to a child molester. That's libel.
He called Mann's hockey stick graph a fraud, which it clearly is. Various investigations have shown that the "statistical method" used to construct it will produce a hockey stick even if white noise is used for input data. They Hockey stick has been dissected 100 different ways, and they all show it to be a fraud.
In the case, Mann wants the court to grant him the right of discovery with regard to Steyn's papers and effects, but wants the court to deny Steyn the right of discovery to Mann's papers and effects. If that doesn't scream "fraud," I don't know what does.
Plaintiff opposes the motion to stay discovery and argues that, at a minimum, the court should permit him to proceed with discovery against Defendant Steyn... Beyond that, Plaintiff takes the ironic – albeit legally correct – position that he should be able to proceed with discovery against Steyn, but Steyn should be precluded from taking discovery on his counterclaim because Plaintiff's anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss the counterclaim triggers an automatic statutory stay.Steyn accused Mann of "molesting the data." To equate that with accusing him of being a child molester is a deliberate smear of Mark Steyn. It also shows a profound lack of a sense of humor.
16 state Attorney Generals are trying to prosecute any organization that questions the AGW cult.
I haven't heard that particular conspiracy theory before. Can you point out where I can read about it?
16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’
I've received some threats myself, and as we've seen in the news, all claims about Trump supporters threatening Hillary supporters have turned out to be fake. Trump supporters have been the targets of threats far more often than any credible threats against Trump opponents.It's hilarious watching douche bags like you acting like you're some kind of persecuted class.
I've recently received three death threats here, all from hardcore Trump-fans/deniers (same group, always). And no denier was willing to condemn the people making those death threats.
All the violence and censorship is on your side. If you're not making the threats, you're standing silent while your fellows make them, and thus you're enabling them.
The evidence that AGW is a huge con just keeps rolling in:
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century
The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.
The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
Judith Curry@curryja
The evidence that AGW is a huge con just keeps rolling in:
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century
The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.
The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
@VariabilityBlog @th3Derek I agree what Goddard did to the data was bogus, I say this in my post. This is not the concern raised in my post
The evidence that AGW is a huge con just keeps rolling in:
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century
The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.
The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
@VariabilityBlog @th3Derek I agree what Goddard did to the data was bogus, I say this in my post. This is not the concern raised in my post
Tony Heller is the author of the article, not Goddard.
Fear not... Polar bears are known to swim 200-300 miles... Ice and walking on it are just a plus for polar bears who eat fish and other wildlife.you mean to tell me that all of those photos of bears living on ice are photo-shopped?
The evidence that AGW is a huge con just keeps rolling in:
100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century
The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.
The adjustments being correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
@VariabilityBlog @th3Derek I agree what Goddard did to the data was bogus, I say this in my post. This is not the concern raised in my post
Tony Heller is the author of the article, not Goddard.
Hey idiot, do a small bit of research...
Love this sort of horse shit...
Even Anthony Watts and Judith Curry call the guy 'Bogus'
Judith Curry on Twitter
This guy is a loon amount the skeptical community nevermind the real scientist community...
Keep it up, you are looking more stupid each day...
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
@VariabilityBlog @th3Derek I agree what Goddard did to the data was bogus, I say this in my post. This is not the concern raised in my post
Tony Heller is the author of the article, not Goddard.
Hey idiot, do a small bit of research...
What should I research, moron, the fact that you don't know who wrote the article?
I don't see any attacks by Curry on the author in the links you posted.
Your post is just an ad hominem attack - a logical fallacy.
@VariabilityBlog @th3Derek I agree what Goddard did to the data was bogus, I say this in my post. This is not the concern raised in my post
Tony Heller is the author of the article, not Goddard.
Hey idiot, do a small bit of research...
What should I research, moron, the fact that you don't know who wrote the article?
Steven Goddard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Steven Goddard (pseudonym for Tony Heller) is a blogger and the publisher of "Real Science," a website he established to assert that concerns over anthropogenic global warming are exaggerated. Before establishing his own blog, Goddard built his reputation as a challenger to anthropogenic climate change theories through frequent postings on the Watts Up with That? blog.[1]Goddard wrote pseudonymously until 2014 when he revealed his true real identity on his blog.[2] He has a BS in geology from Arizona State University and a Master's degree in electrical engineering from Rice University.[3]
Steven Goddard - Wikipedia
That would be checkmate, this is the bit where you get embarrassed...
This could not make you look any stupider... You used an article from a guy so bad that other skeptics openly criticise him. He has been disproven plenty of times before...
You didn't even know his name...
