- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,457
- 24,286
- 2,180
...You are against using nukes,.....
I didn't say that. A detonation over Tokyo Bay or a rural area might have made quite an impression.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
...You are against using nukes,.....
Not when necessary. There were many alternatives to that as well...... you are against invading as well. ....
The people there were already starving. It would not likely have taken years more.... Would you recommend a multi-year blockade that would result in the starvation deaths of a large percentage of the Japanese civilians ...
But you don't mind the American POWs killed by the atomic bombs?... as well as ALL the allied POWS in Japan ...
Oh, was the US military a mercenary force working for those countries?...while the IJA continued to slaughter civilians in occupied China, Korea, South East Asia and the Dutch East Indies?
The U.S. could have waited three days for the Soviet Union to declare war on Japan. After that, the japanese realized that they had no more chances.What's your alternative? You are against using nukes, you are against invading as well.
No one says that.
So you ARE happy that German civilians were killed? You approve of what the Soviet army did in Germany at the end of the war? Is that the kind of person you are?
The U.S. could have waited three days for the Soviet Union to declare war on Japan. After that, the japanese realized that they had no more chances.
But maybe the U.S. thought that the Soviet Union, which had promised to open hostilities against Japan three months after the defeat of Germany, would not do so? So it would act like the US and England who promised to open the Second Front in 1942 and 1943 but failed to fulfill that promise?
I don't think so, the bomb was used just before the USSR entered the war to show those russians, that Uncle Sam had a new big stick. And that was the main reason for using the bomb.
Well, other than to test the results of using atomic weapons against the population, after all, lots of money was spent on Manhattan project
Again, the USSR going to war with Japan meant a quick defeat, but the U.S. didn't wait for that to happen.
Again, the USSR going to war with Japan meant a quick defeat, but the U.S. didn't wait for that to happen.
So you ARE happy that German civilians were killed? You approve of what the Soviet army did in Germany at the end of the war? Is that the kind of person you are?
Back in sticks in 46... Back in Heaven in 47.We ended the war in 3 days ..........
You want (need?) to believe incinerating hundreds of thousands of civilians was "the only way."..... the only way to stop them was to kill enough of them to make them stop....
thats what you advocate when you say no bombs and no invasion.That would have been a bad idea.
Again....you complain endlessly about the Japanese who died .........
Liar.thats what you advocate when you say no bombs and no invasion.
How many atomic bombs did we drop on German civilians?...war, but never chime in to defend the German people......
Historians made many arguments for the use of atomic bombs after the war. But Truman had no choice but to give a greenlight because the immense costs of the atomic project amounted to $20 billion. The US spent $30 billion on bombs and grenades in the entire war. The price tag is $10 billion per atomic bomb.
How many atomic bombs did we drop on German civilians?
How many atomic bombs did we drop on German civilians?