What Does The Second Amendment Mean For Liberals?

I'm asking this question because in another one of my threads, when we started discussing the possibility of an upcoming war (or wars) when people were talking about that they would kill them if needed they took it to mean death threats instead of the true meaning of "I would only kill you if provoked and you were a threat to me."


So that's where I get lost as if they don't know that then what do they think the second amendment means? I know that they can't stand it, but it also seems like they don't have a clue what it's actually talking about.,
Well the answer is simple ... it means ,nothing at all to Democrats. Just like the rest of the USA constitution when it's convenient they will use it , but usually they just want nothing more then widdle it away tovnothing. Democrats, biggest threat to America and Americans...
I'm asking this question because in another one of my threads, when we started discussing the possibility of an upcoming war (or wars) when people were talking about that they would kill them if needed they took it to mean death threats instead of the true meaning of "I would only kill you if provoked and you were a threat to me."


So that's where I get lost as if they don't know that then what do they think the second amendment means? I know that they can't stand it, but it also seems like they don't have a clue what it's actually talking about.
 
I'm asking this question because in another one of my threads, when we started discussing the possibility of an upcoming war (or wars) when people were talking about that they would kill them if needed they took it to mean death threats instead of the true meaning of "I would only kill you if provoked and you were a threat to me."


So that's where I get lost as if they don't know that then what do they think the second amendment means? I know that they can't stand it, but it also seems like they don't have a clue what it's actually talking about.
Well that's simple , like the rest of the Constitution it means nothing at all to Democrats. Watch as they always try widdling it away.
 
Most military members are conservatives, from conservative states. Their oath is to the constitution, not to any politician or party or even government. If they decide the government is violating the constitution, they will support the population resisting governmental overreach.
Very true
They are very loyal to their country and will not support gun nuts trying to overturn a lawful election
 
Most military members are conservatives, from conservative states. Their oath is to the constitution, not to any politician or party or even government. If they decide the government is violating the constitution, they will support the population resisting governmental overreach.
What the hell were they doing in 2020?
 
Trump was sure conserving America before Biden and his administration came along.
He conserved the swamp. He conserved the Neocon wars. He conserved the lack of a wall.

I admit that I was wrong. Conservatives do conserve things.
 
Staying neutral as they should have. The federal military can't interfere with civilian law enforcement. The continual riots by liberals were a law enforcement matter, not a military one.
I'm not talking about the riots. I'm talking about the tyrants in DC and every state capital except South Dakota.
 
Only one maxim that matters:

When seconds count, the police are just minutes away.
 
All we get is 40,000 gun deaths a year
And hundreds of thousands of other deaths occur due other means that the left doesn't care about. And 50% of gun deaths are self inflicted, which the left shouldn't care about either since they are quick to side for the right to choose in many other instances.
 
And hundreds of thousands of other deaths occur due other means that the left doesn't care about. And 50% of gun deaths are self inflicted, which the left shouldn't care about either since they are quick to side for the right to choose in many other instances.

No other nation on earth would tolerate 40,000 gun deaths a year
 
More revisionist history

Our founders created a Constitution with better weapons than armed civilians…….Freedom of the press and the vote

The Second Amendment makes it clear that arms are needed for a well regulated militia…..NOT to use against the Government
It depends on which framer you listen to.

Try Federalist 46 and Federalist 29.
 
Neither is law
Ok. But this is:

(a)
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b)The classes of the militia are—
(1)
the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2)
the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

 

Forum List

Back
Top