Soooo...what do we do about Mars and the way it changes our climate?

[HikerGuy83]

That wasn't the point. The point is don't assume humans are affecting the climate just because atmospheric CO2 is increasing.

Don't bother explaining it.

You'd have better luck with a used dishcloth.

 

[elektra]

We understand you work in a coal mine. Sorry but we really shouldn't be heating our homes with that shit. You're a canary in a coal mine.

I work directly for the green energy industry.
This is where I work, at a solar and wind turbine manufacturing site.

Saudi Arabia loves green energy, it is a 95% chemical process

 

[Zebra]

what does Mars do?

 

[luiza]

what does Mars do?

Oils your taste buds .

 

[ReinyDays]

You do know that there are more trees in the US today than there was 100 years ago. You should also know that plants breath CO2 you know that stuff you loons claim is a pollutant.

True ... but there are less trees in our cities ... where global warming is worst ...

The "deforestation" component of AGW Theory starts with the Agricultural Revolution ... clear cutting forest lands to plant human crops ... Eastern Chinese Plain, Northern Europe, Eastern North America ... all solid trees at the beginning of the Holocene, today these are all grasslands ...

Transpiration is a thing in weather, so it's a thing with climate ... forests return more rainfall back to the atmosphere than grasslands ... more rainfall for downstream biomes ... this has been demonstrated in the Sahel ...

 

[Captain Caveman]

Evidence says we are destroying the environment. Not the planet. The planet will be fine. Long after all the living things on this planet are dead, the planet will continue to spin around the sun/universe.

So keep putting up fossel fuels, carbon, methane and you are making this planet uninhabitable for humans and other animals.

We know for a fact that pollution is taking 10 years off our lives. Cancer, god knows what else.

Why do Republicans hate going green? Put some solar panels on your fucking house. Quit laying sod, cutting grass and watering your fucking lawns you idiots!!!

Could you tell me what level of co2 ppm will reach when life dies out?

Do you have a minimum figure too?

 

[sealybobo]

Could you tell me what level of co2 ppm will reach when life dies out?

Do you have a minimum figure too?

No I couldn't tell you. Are you smarter than the climate change scientists? Or are you a conspiracy theorist?

 

[BackAgain]

Cool, another "DERP! DERP! DERRRRRRRP!

Every time you post.

Anyway, how significant is any impact on Earth’s climate by Mars?

 

[ReinyDays]

Could you tell me what level of co2 ppm will reach when life dies out?

Do you have a minimum figure too?

Strange ... life first evolved in carbon dioxide ... and maybe large amounts of methane ...

It's oxygen that destroys life ... everything except blue-green algae ... we're just pond scum if you believe in evolution ...

 

[Captain Caveman]

No I couldn't tell you. Are you smarter than the climate change scientists? Or are you a conspiracy theorist?

You made a claim, I was wanting to know what co2 levels you based your that on?

You do know, don't you?

It's wise to have a grasp of the subject you partake in?

 

[mamooth]

Anyway, how significant is any impact on Earth’s climate by Mars?

Not significant at all, which is why we wonder why deniers are so fixated on the climate of Mars.

First, Mars isn't warming.

Second, the Martian climate is primarily driven by albedo, which is turn is modified by dust storms. Solar effects on Mars are tiny in comparison.

Venus would be a better barometer of solar effects, given how close to the sun it is, and how constant the cloud-albedo is. Since Venus is so close to Earth and so hot, we can use sensitive IR telescopes here to measure the average temperature.

And Venus isn't warming either. Oops. So much for the solar theory.

 

[BackAgain]

Not significant at all, which is why we wonder why deniers are so fixated on the climate of Mars.

First, Mars isn't warming.

Second, the Martian climate is primarily driven by albedo, which is turn is modified by dust storms. Solar effects on Mars are tiny in comparison.

Venus would be a better barometer of solar effects, given how close to the sun it is, and how constant the cloud-albedo is. Since Venus is so close to Earth and so hot, we can use sensitive IR telescopes here to measure the average temperature.

And Venus isn't warming either. Oops. So much for the solar theory.

I have no idea what Mars has to do with the nonsense spewed by you climate alarmists and propagandists.

 

[Stryder50]

Evidence says we are destroying the environment. Not the planet. The planet will be fine. Long after all the living things on this planet are dead, the planet will continue to spin around the sun/universe.

So keep putting up fossel fuels, carbon, methane and you are making this planet uninhabitable for humans and other animals.

We know for a fact that pollution is taking 10 years off our lives. Cancer, god knows what else.

Why do Republicans hate going green? Put some solar panels on your fucking house. Quit laying sod, cutting grass and watering your fucking lawns you idiots!!!

What do you mean "we" Kimosabe?

While some nations are not helping to be clean, others have done enough to make things better in many ways since 4-5 decades ago.
As from water vapor, which is about 10% more on top of the dry atmosphere, carbon dioxide is only 0.04% of the total, with Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Argon along with "other" doing the rest of composition. That's one part of 2,500 for CO2. Methane is even smaller at 0.0004% about one part per 250,000!

With 99+% of life on this planet needing CO2 to support the rest of us, CO2/Carbon Dioxide is NOT a pollution! Not any more than the oxygen, at @21% or 210,000 ppm is a pollution!

Look elsewhere for pollution like India, or CCP China, Komrade.

Republicans don't hate going green if it costs less than what it produces, and making it isn't more harmful to the environment.

Why do you greenie idiots fail at sciences and simple math (and economics) ???

 

[sealybobo]

What do you mean "we" Kimosabe?

While some nations are not helping to be clean, others have done enough to make things better in many ways since 4-5 decades ago.
As from water vapor, which is about 10% more on top of the dry atmosphere, carbon dioxide is only 0.04% of the total, with Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Argon along with "other" doing the rest of composition. That's one part of 2,500 for CO2. Methane is even smaller at 0.0004% about one part per 250,000!

With 99+% of life on this planet needing CO2 to support the rest of us, CO2/Carbon Dioxide is NOT a pollution! Not any more than the oxygen, at @21% or 210,000 ppm is a pollution!

Look elsewhere for pollution like India, or CCP China, Komrade.

Republicans don't hate going green if it costs less than what it produces, and making it isn't more harmful to the environment.

Why do you greenie idiots fail at sciences and simple math (and economics) ???

Yes you guys do mind. You mind the cost of going green. Oil companies would rather not have to do that and just keep with the status quo. For as long as they can. Guess who will own the next windmill or battery plant? SHELL! Or Exxon! Or BP!! They're already investing in it. But for now, they want to just keep burning gas oil and coal. Drill baby drill.

We get the math and science. You're not telling us anything we don't already know. But you seem to be suggesting we stop going green. No serious person agrees with that. But a lot of Republicans say it because the oil lobbyists pay the politicians and Fox News a lot of money to lie to you.