She made it at the time.Weird she made no comment of that in Parliament, or at the UN, or at Harvard. None at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She made it at the time.Weird she made no comment of that in Parliament, or at the UN, or at Harvard. None at all.
That America has the best press freedom. That America has the best human freedom.any chance you could list the propaganda?
based on what? certainly not opposing view points which does more to define that freedom than anything elseActually New Zealand ranks 8th on press freedom.
any republican could have told you that tommy, in fact they may think it is a too kind ranking...it is Americas white liberals who think our press is an example of a free press.The US is 32nd behind Cape Verde and Uruguay.
Tommy, that is just a list of countries with nothing to define the list or why it was even made...it literally says nothing at all which may be the perfect example of liberal informationThe ranking
rsf.org
Show me where.You are badly informd on this issue.
She made it at the time.
Uh huh, sure she did. Maybe you can provide that quote then, as the ones I've seen on Snopes and literally everywhere else I looked made no mention of that what-so-ever.
Comes directly from the liberal media and white liberals...the right in this country believes it is sham to call it free, they think our "MSM" is a mind numbing brainwashing cult of personality with no use for diverse opinion....they actually agree with you on this and believe it is just like your countries media in that area.That America has the best press freedom.
hmmmm...way too broad, needs to be as specific as your first claim...but to check your honesty level before we continue I ask this...high taxes vs. low taxes, which is a bigger threat to freedom?That America has the best human freedom.
I note you cannot say what nonsense she's supposed to have said. All you can do is talk in unsupported generalities.Then she went on to spout the same nonsense for a year or more, including at the UN in 2022 but she totally didn't mean THAT THEN.
Deplorable ignorance.which is a bigger threat to freedom?
Invincible ignorance is invincible. That's why it's called that.Tommy, that is just a list of countries with nothing to define the list or why it was even made...it literally says nothing at all which may be the perfect example of liberal information
Invincible ignorance is invincible. 'For that information' is categorically stated.You think that supports your position? It doesn't. At all.
I guess they're not American. But weren't you the one wibbling about 'press freedom' in NZ?Comes directly from the liberal media and white liberals
I note you cannot say what nonsense she's supposed to have said. All you can do is talk in unsupported generalities.
All information, not THAT information. They made no discernment whatsoever that this was only about government operations/plans.Invincible ignorance is invincible. 'For that information' is categorically stated.
They produce a report which fleshes it out. They do it every year. I am struggling to understand the point you are making.based on what? certainly not opposing view points which does more to define that freedom than anything else
any republican could have told you that tommy, in fact they may think it is a too kind ranking...it is Americas white liberals who think our press is an example of a free press.
Tommy, that is just a list of countries with nothing to define the list or why it was even made...it literally says nothing at all which may be the perfect example of liberal information
Show me where.
Tommy your post is proof of how easy it is to fool the socially educated.
As opposed to what? typical ignorance? Ya know I was at that commencement ceremony and saw your PM [whom I do find charming] up close and it was so obvious she is not Ivy league material.Deplorable ignorance.
Your struggle is a self induced struggle tommy, as long as you want to pretend you do not see the lack of diverse opinion in the claim you made you can then pretend it is not thereThey produce a report which fleshes it out. They do it every year. I am struggling to understand the point you are making.
no, NZ is liberal democracy with a press that supports liberal ideals while barring the type of press that calls BS on those ideals and that, in and of itself, bores out the bogus nature of the reportNew Zealand is a liberal democracy with press freedom.The report supports this.
no, just the type in your post who it is made clear are not permitted to ply their trade in NZ due to their opposing viewsPerhaps you have a list of journos that Jacinda has locked up ?
How do they "flesh it out"?They produce a report which fleshes it out. They do it every year.
the "wibbling" was all you, I merely pointed out that tommy's post was proof of NZ' lack of diversity of opinion in media, much like our own until Murdoch happened alongI guess they're not American. But weren't you the one wibbling about 'press freedom' in NZ?
only if diverse opinion is alien to youStrange.
Never actually heard of it. [and until recently never really encountered it] do ya think a lack of diverse thought and opinion may have something to do with that? I mean where else would such ignorance come from?Invincible ignorance is invincible. That's why it's called that.