Climate Alarmists are Meeeellllltttting.....melllllllttttttinnnnng

[CrusaderFrank]

Good fucking god are you stupid.

In your linked video, we do not see or hear Al Gore nor is his name mentioned even once.

There is no date given for the comment about Florida being flooded.

There is not a single false, exaggerated or mistaken statement in the entire report.

Sea level rising? Nope
Florida underwater? Nope
CO2 warming the atmosphere? Nope
Al Gore in the video? Nope

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Oh yeah?

View attachment 949777

EIA expects U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions to increase in 2022 and 2023 - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

www.eia.gov

All my doing. Said so yourself.


Who? The church?

I've been doing without the church for a long time.

Writing home? My parents are both long dead. To whom would I be writing?

The US lowered its output by switching to gas.

China dwarfed these reductions by building 2 to 3 NEW COAL PLANTS EACH AND EVERY WEEK

 

[Crick]

Sea level rising? Nope

Lie

Florida underwater? Nope

It's headed that way.

CO2 warming the atmosphere? Nope

Lie.

Al Gore in the video? Nope

YOU CLAIMED HE WAS. So, another lie.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Lie

It's headed that way.

Lie.

YOU CLAIMED HE WAS. So, another lie.

I never claimed Gore was, I reposted a video.

It so happens that Gore is the patron Saint of the Cult of the USA CO2 molecule (China's CO2 has no effect, because it's on a per capita basis, er, or something. I'm sure the IPCC Covered this in a series of footnotes)

 

[Crick]

I never claimed Gore was, I reposted a video.

Unless you were to initially state that you knew it contained specific falsehoods, by posting that, you were stating that you agreed with it.

It so happens that Gore is the patron Saint of the Cult of the USA CO2 molecule (China's CO2 has no effect, because it's on a per capita basis, er, or something. I'm sure the IPCC Covered this in a series of footnotes)

He is not, but you are as stupid as stupid can get.

 

[ding]

Crick seems angry today.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Unless you were to initially state that you knew it contained specific falsehoods, by posting that, you were stating that you agreed with it.

He is not, but you are as stupid as stupid can get.

Riiiight. But you’re the one who BELIEVES that 120ppm of additional CO2 can raise Earth temperatures by 1C

 

[Crick]

Riiiight. But you’re the one who BELIEVES that 120ppm of additional CO2 can raise Earth temperatures by 1C

Me and about a hundred thousand PhD scientists.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Me and about a hundred thousand PhD scientists.

Appeals to authority are not a valid, scientific argument.

A few hundred years ago, the same group was insisting that their models showed the Earth to be the stable center of the Universe suspended on the back of infinite turtles.

There's not one single repeatable lab experiment that replicates the imaginary "120PPM CO2 = 1C" Failed Theory

 

[Crick]

Appeals to authority are not a valid, scientific argument.

I'm afraid in the case where we are talking about a very strong consensus among the actual experts in THIS field, it is completely valid.

A few hundred years ago, the same group was insisting that their models showed the Earth to be the stable center of the Universe suspended on the back of infinite turtles.

The same group?

There's not one single repeatable lab experiment that replicates the imaginary "120PPM CO2 = 1C" Failed Theory

There's not a shred of evidence that you have the faintest idea how basic science actually works or that you are willing to accept ANY evidence refuting your idiotic beliefs.