Zuckerberg says Biden/Harris administration

[eagle7-31]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

pressured to censor free speech. Gee what a shock.....not.

 

[toobfreak]

pressured to censor free speech. Gee what a shock.....not.

They not only did it to aid Biden in GETTING elected, but since then to make Biden look good---

---and he STILL turned out looking like warmed over hammered shit.

 

[crossbody]

Zuckerberg made the admission in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) this week in which he said that his goal moving forward was to “be neutral and not play a role one way or another” for either any political party or ideology. He said he doesn’t even want the appearance of playing a role and will not be making political contributions.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

He says he is not giving the democrats any of his money for politics

 

[EMH]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

pressured to censor free speech. Gee what a shock.....not.

Censorship, supported by

FASCISTS
MARXISTS
COMMUNISTS
DEMOCRATS
Zionist 911 W "Biden Republican" PRO ISRAEL RINOs

 

[toobfreak]

He says he is not giving the democrats any of his money for politics

BOLOGNA. as I recall, Time Magazine reported in February 2021 that in fact Zuckerberg had donated 410 million dollars towards a legion of secret leftwing shadow organizations for getting out an all-out campaign drive to get voters to the polls in 2020 en masse for the express purpose of assuring that Trump LOST.

 

[Catsnmeters]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

pressured to censor free speech. Gee what a shock.....not.

Nice.

I love seeing a company exercise their first amendment rights.

“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including COVID-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure.”

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats love censorship and support government collaborating with tech companies to censor free speech they don't like.

Hey Zuck. The WEF/Democrats are planning on taking your platform from you. There are WEF/Democrat operatives close to you trying to set you up. Just a heads up

 

[Silent Warrior]

BOLOGNA. as I recall, Time Magazine reported in February 2021 that in fact Zuckerberg had donated 410 million dollars towards a legion of secret leftwing shadow organizations for getting out an all-out campaign drive to get voters to the polls in 2020 en masse for the express purpose of assuring that Trump LOST.

True, but perhaps he means he sees what a disaster he created by helping Dems get elected, feels guilty, and will give them no money going forward.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

True, but perhaps he means he sees what a disaster he created by helping Dems get elected, feels guilty, and will give them no money going forward.

The WEF/Democrats are going to try to take Zucks platform away from him just like the Telegram guy.

 

[el midgetron]

Democrats can’t compete in a free market of ideas because they are stupid and have stupid ideas. The only other explanation is that they are corrupt and deceitful. The reality is a combination of the two.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Democrats can’t compete in a free market of ideas because they are stupid and have stupid ideas. The only other explanation is that they are corrupt and deceitful. The reality is a combination of the two.

Pressuring does not violate the first amendment.

Zuckerberg can post or not post anything he wants. That is protected by the first amendment.

Facebook throttled the laptop story. Zuckerbergs first amendment right.

What's the problem?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Zuckerberg made the admission in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) this week in which he said that his goal moving forward was to “be neutral and not play a role one way or another” for either any political party or ideology. He said he doesn’t even want the appearance of playing a role and will not be making political contributions.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

He says he is not giving the democrats any of his money for politics

And Clinton said he “did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky.” Nixon said “ I am not a crook.”
What’s your point?

 

[el midgetron]

Pressuring does not violate the first amendment.

Zuckerberg can post or not post anything he wants. That is protected by the first amendment.

Facebook throttled the laptop story. Zuckerbergs first amendment right.

What's the problem?

The problem are dipshits who think it’s fine for the government to bully the media into a specific narrative. Why on Earth would you partisan freaks defend the government doing this?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The problem are dipshits who think it’s fine for the government to bully the media into a specific narrative. Why on Earth would you partisan freaks defend the government doing this?

Because they’re all rooting for the Cowboys or the Yankees or whatever vacuous narrative they’re brainwashed into.

 

[Independent thinker]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/zuckerberg-biden-harris-repeatedly-pressured-us-to-censor-free-speech

pressured to censor free speech. Gee what a shock.....not.

They have turned us into Russia where the government tells the media what they can and cannot report.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The problem are dipshits who think it’s fine for the government to bully the media into a specific narrative. Why on Earth would you partisan freaks defend the government doing this?

There is nothing wrong with Trump's FBI asking Facebook to not post something(s). As long as no threat is involved I see no issue. The fed has been doing it for decades. Did you not know that?

 

[el midgetron]

There is nothing wrong with Trump's FBI asking Facebook to not post something(s). As long as no threat is involved I see no issue. The fed has been doing it for decades. Did you not know that?

When did “Trump’s FBI” do that? Before or after Facebook suspended him for two years?

It’s a problem when the government wants to use censorship to hide the truth from the public. Especially when it’s something that is in their own interest, like concealing corruption and information damaging to them.

I like how the liberals all suddenly support government censorship, at least as long as it favors their party…….

 

[Catsnmeters]

When did “Trump’s FBI” do that? Before or after Facebook suspended him for two years?

I was only pointing out that anything the FBI did regarding Hunter's laptop before Biden won the election was Trump's the administration.

It’s a problem when the government wants to use censorship to hide the truth from the public.

Non sequitur. They didn't use censorship.

Especially when it’s something that is in their own interest, like concealing corruption and information damaging to them.

Agreed. When did the fed threaten Facebook?

I like how the liberals all suddenly support government censorship, at least as long as it favors their party…….

Can you be more specific?

 

[el midgetron]

I was only pointing out that anything the FBI did regarding Hunter's laptop before Biden won the election was Trump's the administration.

So, you believe “Trump’s FBI” was out their burying negative stories about Trump’s political rivals, because they were doing Trump’s bidding? You might not have been paying attention but the FBI has not been Trump’s ally.

Non sequitur. They didn't use censorship.

So, the Laptop story censored it’s self?

Agreed. When did the fed threaten Facebook?

Who said anything about “threatening”?

Can you be more specific?

Can you be more obtuse? Reread the thread, get back to me.

 

[Catsnmeters]

So, you believe “Trump’s FBI” was out their burying negative stories about Trump’s political rivals, because they were doing Trump’s bidding? You might not have been paying attention but the FBI has not been Trump’s ally.

You tell me. If it's your contention that Biden is responsible for the FBI when he both is and isn't president then I give up. You win. Their is no logical argument against such nonsense.

So, the Laptop story censored it’s self?

Beats me. Zuckerberg said ultimately it was up to them.

I guess we know what he decided.

Who said anything about “threatening”?

Just clarifying that Trump's FBI at no time threatened punishment or retribution.

Can you be more obtuse? Reread the thread, get back to me.

Sorry. Not going to research your contentions.

Thanks though.