Your Attorney General

[longknife]

Gee whiz. Did you know he's black? Seems he wants you to be sure he is.


Read article with links @ Holder Reminds Everyone That He 8217 s Black The Foxhole

 

[Hossfly]

Gee whiz. Did you know he's black? Seems he wants you to be sure he is.


Read article with links @ Holder Reminds Everyone That He 8217 s Black The Foxhole

Holder is the counterpart to Bill Ayers. Another of Oblame-o's girlfriends.

 

[shart_attack]

I don't really trust Holder with respect to a lot of things.

I'm not sure how many of his motives are truly altruistic, or merely self-serving.

I don't like a lot of the things that he's done — like arming a drug Cartel, and refusing to prosecute financial institutions with malevolent intentions, among a host of things.

I don't like the way he arrogantly speaks to legislators—"You don't wanna go there!"—who are questioning him as per their jobs in investigating his actions and/ or motives as chief law enforcer of the land.

But I do admire that he's trying to change the American prison-industrial complex for the better:

Holder to Oppose Data-Driven Sentencing - TIME

Again, whether he's trying to do that because he actually wants to help Americans, or merely because he's trying to elevate his namesake, I don't know.

But I do like that about him. Very much.

It is shameful that the wealthiest country in the "free world" also paradoxically has the greatest number of its population behind bars — in many cases, for crimes that are the least detrimental to society.

You. Go. Holder.

 

[Mr. H.]

Holder is a corrupt little asswipe with a hard-on for ‘******’.

 

[HenryBHough]

Holder is a corrupt little asswipe with a hard-on for ‘******’.

Not a nice way to speak of your next president. At least wait until he's elected and has a week or two to prove you're right.

 

[Mr. H.]

Holder is a corrupt little asswipe with a hard-on for ‘******’.

Not a nice way to speak of your next president. At least wait until he's elected and has a week or two to prove you're right.

That line was from the quoted article, ergo the italics.
You did read the article didn't you?