2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,556
- 52,803
- 2,290
The goal of obama was passing and protecting obamacare....this is why he didn't try to openly pass gun control laws...he left it to the states and the cities, as well as his left wing judicial appointments.
biden and harris will kick it up a notch...by a lot.....
The Democratsâ national platform contains a long list of gun control promises. On the agenda are national gun licensing, lawsuits against firearm manufacturers whenever guns are used improperly, bans on some semi-automatic guns that happen to look militaristic, Red Flag laws that let judges take away peopleâs guns without a hearing, long waiting periods for background checks, and mandatory gun storage laws. Even Democrat candidates in gun-friendly states have taken a more radical tack. U.S. Senate challenger Steve Bullock of Montana has publicly supported virtually all of the proposals in the platform.
Being able to sue gun stores and manufacturers whenever a crime or accident occurs (even a suicide) would put the firearms industry out of business.
Could you imagine what would happen to the car or the computer industries were similar rules to apply? 4.5 million Americans are injured each year in car accidents, and about 40,000 die. Criminals also frequently use cars when they commit crimes.
Similarly, computers make it easier for criminals to commit all sorts of crimes. How long would these companies remain in business if they faced lawsuits whenever their products are used improperly? Their products would become much more expensive to cover the companyâs new legal fees.
While Joe Biden and Kamala Harris join Beto OâRourke in calling AR-15s âweapons of war,â the semi-automatic AR-15 merely looks like the M-16 machine gun of Vietnam War fame. No military in the world uses these AR-15s.
Most guns owned by Americans are semi-automatics. To ban some of them based on their looks makes no sense. The AR-15 uses the same sort of bullet as small-game hunting rifles, fires with the same rapidity (one bullet per pull of the trigger), and inflicts equal damage.
Indeed, the AR-15âs .223 inch rounds are banned for deer-hunting in most US states. Thatâs because the small bullet is likely to prolong the animalâs suffering by wounding rather than killing it.
Democratâs support of Red Flag laws is troubling. We all want to keep mentally ill people who are dangerous from getting guns. But with Red Flag laws, judges make decisions after only seeing a complaint about the mental state of the individual. No mental health experts are consulted, no hearing is held for up to a month after a personâs guns are confiscated, and no legal counsel is provided to those who canât afford one.
Every state already has Involuntary Commitment laws, with all of the protections that Red Flag laws miss. A judge listens to a mental health care expertâs evaluation and has many options for treatment or protection.
At the federal level, the greatest threat to Second Amendment rights may come not from elected officials themselves, but from the judges that they pick.
Few issues divide Democrat and Republican-appointed judges more consistently and completely than gun control. President Trumpâs 200 federal judicial confirmations have only just brought the courts into balance, with Democrat-appointees still controlling circuit courts for 24 states plus DC. Many of these circuit courts cover the most restrictive states and they will approve any regulation that comes before them, no matter how flagrantly it infringes on the right to keep and bear arms.
Donât expect the Supreme Court to restrain these courts. All four Democrat appointments claim that people donât have a right to self-defense, and have already noted that they will vote to overturn the courtâs 2008 Heller and 2010 McDonald decisions. Those rulings merely ensured that the government could not completely ban guns.
crimeresearch.org
biden and harris will kick it up a notch...by a lot.....
The Democratsâ national platform contains a long list of gun control promises. On the agenda are national gun licensing, lawsuits against firearm manufacturers whenever guns are used improperly, bans on some semi-automatic guns that happen to look militaristic, Red Flag laws that let judges take away peopleâs guns without a hearing, long waiting periods for background checks, and mandatory gun storage laws. Even Democrat candidates in gun-friendly states have taken a more radical tack. U.S. Senate challenger Steve Bullock of Montana has publicly supported virtually all of the proposals in the platform.
Being able to sue gun stores and manufacturers whenever a crime or accident occurs (even a suicide) would put the firearms industry out of business.
Could you imagine what would happen to the car or the computer industries were similar rules to apply? 4.5 million Americans are injured each year in car accidents, and about 40,000 die. Criminals also frequently use cars when they commit crimes.
Similarly, computers make it easier for criminals to commit all sorts of crimes. How long would these companies remain in business if they faced lawsuits whenever their products are used improperly? Their products would become much more expensive to cover the companyâs new legal fees.
While Joe Biden and Kamala Harris join Beto OâRourke in calling AR-15s âweapons of war,â the semi-automatic AR-15 merely looks like the M-16 machine gun of Vietnam War fame. No military in the world uses these AR-15s.
Most guns owned by Americans are semi-automatics. To ban some of them based on their looks makes no sense. The AR-15 uses the same sort of bullet as small-game hunting rifles, fires with the same rapidity (one bullet per pull of the trigger), and inflicts equal damage.
Indeed, the AR-15âs .223 inch rounds are banned for deer-hunting in most US states. Thatâs because the small bullet is likely to prolong the animalâs suffering by wounding rather than killing it.
Democratâs support of Red Flag laws is troubling. We all want to keep mentally ill people who are dangerous from getting guns. But with Red Flag laws, judges make decisions after only seeing a complaint about the mental state of the individual. No mental health experts are consulted, no hearing is held for up to a month after a personâs guns are confiscated, and no legal counsel is provided to those who canât afford one.
Every state already has Involuntary Commitment laws, with all of the protections that Red Flag laws miss. A judge listens to a mental health care expertâs evaluation and has many options for treatment or protection.
At the federal level, the greatest threat to Second Amendment rights may come not from elected officials themselves, but from the judges that they pick.
Few issues divide Democrat and Republican-appointed judges more consistently and completely than gun control. President Trumpâs 200 federal judicial confirmations have only just brought the courts into balance, with Democrat-appointees still controlling circuit courts for 24 states plus DC. Many of these circuit courts cover the most restrictive states and they will approve any regulation that comes before them, no matter how flagrantly it infringes on the right to keep and bear arms.
Donât expect the Supreme Court to restrain these courts. All four Democrat appointments claim that people donât have a right to self-defense, and have already noted that they will vote to overturn the courtâs 2008 Heller and 2010 McDonald decisions. Those rulings merely ensured that the government could not completely ban guns.
At Newsweek: Americansâ very right to keep and bear arms is on the ballot this election
Dr. John Lott has a new piece up at Newsweek on why this election will determine the future of private gun ownership in the US. Lott debated John Rosenthal, who is the co-founder of Massachusetts-bâŚ
crimeresearch.org
