eots
no fly list
No worries Lookout.........................![]()
emos are for girly men and little girls
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No worries Lookout.........................![]()
I read the text of it. IMO, it won't fly. You're just fearmongering.
I don't think the First Amendment should be censored.
At the same time, do you REALLY think the intent of the First Amendment is to give voice to those that wish to destroy it? The Constiution is not a suicide pact.
IMO, the litmus test should be when freedom of speech allows the promotion of ideals that if brought to fruition are criminal acts.
Whatever happened to common sense in this country?
Yeah and you need dentle work.................you got ugly teeth..............didn't you mom teach ya nothin' ??????????![]()
I read the text of it. IMO, it won't fly. You're just fearmongering.
I don't think the First Amendment should be censored.
At the same time, do you REALLY think the intent of the First Amendment is to give voice to those that wish to destroy it? The Constiution is not a suicide pact.
IMO, the litmus test should be when freedom of speech allows the promotion of ideals that if brought to fruition are criminal acts.
Whatever happened to common sense in this country?
Inciting to riot is a crime. Discussing the need for revolution is not. When we limit the first amendment to not allow the discussion of ideals, that if brought to fuition are criminal acts, we limit that freedom period.
One of the most famous known activities of Mensa groups is to plan the perfect murder. Would that not, under your suggestion, be punishable as a crime?
In some States it IS a crime to plan a crime. You never have to execute the plan and in fact the plan could just be a mental exersize, but by that State law it is a crime.
As for insurrection discussing it in an academic matter is not a crime. And I seriously doubt it ever will become a crime. But organizing , training and preparing to actually revolt SHOULD be a crime.
Now I know that it may some day be needed for us to revolt. That does not change the fact that the Government has a duty and responsibility to protect itself. The difference between a Patriot and a traitor is who wins. No matter which side your on and think is right.
nothing personal just one mans humble opinion on emos..you should certainly express yourself as you see fit...but if I where king of the world...
What States are those? Even Conspiracy requires at least one affirmative act in furtherance of the Conspiracy before it can be charged, not just agreement to commit a crime.
Did you just ask him to post EVIDENCE?
![]()
FOOL! Evidence is not legal tender around here.
In some States it IS a crime to plan a crime. You never have to execute the plan and in fact the plan could just be a mental exersize, but by that State law it is a crime.
What States are those? Even Conspiracy requires at least one affirmative act in furtherance of the Conspiracy before it can be charged, not just agreement to commit a crime.
Exactly... but the overt act can be pretty minor.
Exactly... but the overt act can be pretty minor.
Like taking pictures of the place you plan the crime for. Or having drawn plans of said place and instructions on timing and events.
Inciting to riot is a crime. Discussing the need for revolution is not. When we limit the first amendment to not allow the discussion of ideals, that if brought to fuition are criminal acts, we limit that freedom period.
One of the most famous known activities of Mensa groups is to plan the perfect murder. Would that not, under your suggestion, be punishable as a crime?
Sedition is a term of law which refers to covert conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition
What States make those things illegal?
How Americans are not outraged at this bill, and flooding their congresspeople with calls, emails, and even personal appearances to voice opposition over this bill, is beyond me.
We're literally turning into Nazi Germany here, and no one seems to notice except the "kooks".
How Americans are not outraged at this bill, and flooding their congresspeople with calls, emails, and even personal appearances to voice opposition over this bill, is beyond me.
We're literally turning into Nazi Germany here, and no one seems to notice except the "kooks".
`(8) Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. I would change should to shall. The former is suggestive while the latter is directive.
`(9) Certain governments, including the Government of the United Kingdom, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Australia have significant experience with homegrown terrorism and the United States can benefit from lessons learned by those nations. I'd leave this out. It's a sure bet someone will start the "we are using others laws to make our laws" argument just as they did the USSC a while ago