Would FDR Have Rushed Aid to Berlin? Lincoln to Atlanta?

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
91,783
62,645
2,605
Right coast, classified
No, the entire point of winning a war is denying the enemy everything. Everything. Civilians were not targeted if they stayed out of the way, but if they got hungry, good. No food for the enemy then.

The problem we have is the guy in the White House does not want Hamas destroyed. He wants to feed and comfort the enemy.

And don’t start the crap it’s for the citizens. Just like in NAZI Germany and the Confederate South, the entire population were in on doing everything they could to support their armies.

And like NAZI Germany and the Confederate South, the citizens could turn on their leadership and bring an end to a war that has only one inevitable conclusion.

 
No, the entire point of winning a war is denying the enemy everything. Everything. Civilians were not targeted if they stayed out of the way, but if they got hungry, good. No food for the enemy then.

The problem we have is the guy in the White House does not want Hamas destroyed. He wants to feed and comfort the enemy.

And don’t start the crap it’s for the citizens. Just like in NAZI Germany and the Confederate South, the entire population were in on doing everything they could to support their armies.

And like NAZI Germany and the Confederate South, the citizens could turn on their leadership and bring an end to a war that has only one inevitable conclusion.

Another Marshall Plan?
 
No plan will work in the quicksand of the Middle East. If Ghandi couldnt do it....no one can
 

Forum List

Back
Top