Will you watch how the party objecting tries to stall proceedings? And they failed.

[Robert W]

Congress is paid for by all of us. For a party to routinely stop proceedings is stinking up Congress. And big time stink comes from them. Proof is right here. And also notice who is absent. They get paid to be absent. Can we notify Congress we object and will you do this?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Like when the GOP refused to pass a very good immigration bill.

 

[jotathought]

Like when the GOP refused to pass a very good immigration bill.

It was a bi-partisan effort to deny it, so nice try.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It was overwhelmingly a GOP rejection. Jotathot won't tell you the truth.

Like when the GOP refused to pass a very good immigration bill.

Jotathought It was a bi-partisan effort to deny it, so nice try.

 

[jotathought]

It was overwhelmingly a GOP rejection. Jotathot won't tell you the truth.


Jotathought It was a bi-partisan effort to deny it, so nice try.

When one Democrat get's onboard for Republic legislation, it's called bi-partisan. Touche.

At least 4 Democrats and 1 Independent voted against it, and it required a 60 majority vote.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It was a bi-partisan effort that feel short because so many GOP voted against it.

It was overwhelmingly a GOP rejection. Jotathot won't tell you the truth.


Jotathought It was a bi-partisan effort to deny it, so nice try.

When one Democrat get's onboard for Republic legislation, it's called bi-partisan. Touche.

At least 4 Democrats and 1 Independent voted against it, and it required a 60 majority vote.

 

[jwoodie]

It was a bi-partisan effort that feel short because so many GOP voted against it.

Do you have any idea how stupid your post is?

 

[American Eagle]

It

Who is John Edgar Slow Horses in your user name?

 

[1srelluc]

Like when the GOP refused to pass a very good immigration bill.

Define was was good about it?

 

[Lesh]

It was a bi-partisan effort that feel short because so many GOP voted against it.


When one Democrat get's onboard for Republic legislation, it's called bi-partisan. Touche.

At least 4 Democrats and 1 Independent voted against it, and it required a 60 majority vote.

As noted… it requires a 60 vote majority. Which it would have had with Republicans if had Trump not intervened.
If every Dem had voted for it it would not have passed. If only the Republicans who helped draft it and a few more had voted for it… it would have passed

 

[jc456]

Do you have any idea how stupid your post is?

that fker has no honor

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

jwoodie cannot stand being corrected, which I did, when he is wrong.

 

[jc456]

jwoodie cannot stand being corrected, which I did, when he is wrong.

when?

 

[22lcidw]

It was a bi-partisan effort that feel short because so many GOP voted against it.


When one Democrat get's onboard for Republic legislation, it's called bi-partisan. Touche.

At least 4 Democrats and 1 Independent voted against it, and it required a 60 majority vote.

You guys are not trusted. You sell out your own and you even follow agendas that will get you killed along with others. Netanyahu saw protesters outside the capitol building "Gays for Gaza". He said that's like "Chickens for KFC". We will have a beautiful Islamic nation at some point.