Will you accept the election results regardless of who wins?

[TemplarKormac]

Oh. So you never questioned Trump’s victory in 2016.

I’m shocked.

With the caveat of having not searched your posts:

Up until this point, have you questioned Biden's?

 

[XponentialChaos]

With the caveat of having not searched your posts:

Up until this point, have you questioned Biden's?

I made it clear that I will accept the legitimacy of whichever candidate wins.

Biden legitimately won in 2020. Trump legitimately won in 2016.

You people only accept the legitimacy of the one who wins when it’s your side that wins. You never question the legitimacy of your own side when they win, just the other side when they win.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I made it clear that I will accept the legitimacy of whichever candidate wins.

Biden legitimately won in 2020. Trump legitimately won in 2016.

You people only accept the legitimacy of the one who wins when it’s your side that wins. You never question the legitimacy of your own side when they win, just the other side when they win.

So, you admit you're selectively blind, just as you accuse us of being.

If there is legitimate evidence, you will not acknowledge it.

You attack us for questioning Biden's win, but you won't. You sing praises for a four-wheeled car running on three wheels.

 

[XponentialChaos]

So, you admit you're selectively blind, just as you accuse us of being.

If there is legitimate evidence, you will not acknowledge it.

“Legitimate evidence” according to who? You?

 

[TemplarKormac]

“Legitimate evidence” according to who? You?

According to legitimate sources, whoever they may be.

 

[XponentialChaos]

According to legitimate sources, whoever they may be.

“Legitimate evidence” from “legitimate sources”.

Translation: when your side loses, you’re going to seek “legitimate evidence” from “legitimate sources” to convince you that the election was stolen. When your side wins, you will simply accept that your side won.

B.

 

[TemplarKormac]

“Legitimate evidence” from “legitimate sources”.

Translation: when your side loses, you’re going to seek “legitimate evidence” from “legitimate sources” to convince you that the election was stolen. When your side wins, you will simply accept that your side won.

B.

You love to translate and make choices for other people.

Go read the claims made by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai and Dr. Douglas Frank.

You'll naturally dismiss them though.

 

[The Duke]

Will you accept the election results regardless of who wins?

It’s time for Americans to grow up and accept the reality that your favorite candidate isn’t always going to win. We’re a nation of sore losers who will only accept the results that we like and claim that the election is rigged when our side doesn’t win.

Stop it.

I trust our democratic process and I will accept the results of the election regardless of who wins. Will you? A or B.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4883703-2024-election-results-distrust-survey/

No. Liar Commie shill.
Here's why: Unlike you, I can read the room.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I will never accept a communist government.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You love to translate and make choices for other people.

Go read the claims made by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai and Dr. Douglas Frank.

You'll naturally dismiss them though.

See? When your side loses, you’re going to actively seek some loon on the internet, any loon, who tells you what you want to believe.

“Legitimate claims” are any half-baked conspiracy theory. “Legitimate sources” are any people who believe what you want to believe.

QED.

 

[TemplarKormac]

See? When your side loses, you’re going to actively seek some loon on the internet, any loon, who tells you what you want to believe.

“Legitimate claims” are any half-baked conspiracy theory. “Legitimate sources” are any people who believe what you want to believe.

QED.

Naturally, you dismissed them.

QED.

 

[TemplarKormac]

See? When your side loses, you’re going to actively seek some loon on the internet, any loon, who tells you what you want to believe.

“Legitimate claims” are any half-baked conspiracy theory. “Legitimate sources” are any people who believe what you want to believe.

QED.

Our election system is so sacrosanct, that it is beyond reproach. Beyond questioning. That is, according to you.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Naturally, you dismissed them.

QED.

You selectively listen to right-wing loons to convince you that the elections your side lost were stolen.

I suppose you think it’s a magical coincidence that you only ever question the legitimacy of Republican losses, never Republican victories.

 

[ThisIsMe]

No, that's B.

People are going to believe in signs of fraud simply because their side lost. They won't believe any such fraud took place when their own candidate wins.

You said it yourself - The left did it in 2016 when Trump won, the right did it when Biden won in 2020. Notice that it was only the losing side that believed fraud occurred.

2020 is a great example of this. Republicans claim that there was so much "funny business" and that Biden wasn't legitimately elected. On those same ballots, they also voted for Republican legislators. The same exact ballots. Have you ever seen any Republicans argue that those winning Republican legislators, on those exact same ballots, did not legitimately win?

Ok…if trump wins and there are signs of fraud, are you going to accept the results of the election ?

 

[TemplarKormac]

You selectively listen to right-wing loons to convince you that the elections your side lost were stolen.

I listen to them because of the collective experience in the field that they have, unlike you.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Our election system is so sacrosanct, that it is beyond reproach. Beyond questioning. That is, according to you.

Yet as critical as you are of our election system, you can’t show me a single post of yours calling into question the legitimacy of a Republican who won, only Democrats who won.

What a magical coincidence that each time they happen when your grandmother is dealing with her broken hip.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I listen to them because of the collective experience in the field that they have, unlike you.

I suppose you think it’s a magical coincidence that you only ever question the legitimacy of Republican losses, never Republican victories.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Ok…if trump wins and there are signs of fraud, are you going to accept the results of the election ?

“Signs of fraud” according to who?

I’ll trust the process to work itself out. I’m not going to be swayed by baseless conspiracy theories.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I posted the screenshot earlier. That history.

Go look it up if you can’t remember.

Yep. And I explained that as well. 2020 isn’t 2024. You’re a British Cigarette

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yep. And I explained that as well. 2020 isn’t 2024. You’re a British Cigarette

History shows that you will look for any excuse to consider an election rigged when you lose and you’ve also consistently proven to be dishonest.