Will you accept the election results regardless of who wins?

[XponentialChaos]

You're contradicting yourself because you said that you trust the results no matter who wins right?

A minimal amount of fraud is not enough to change the election result, so the results will be legitimate regardless of who wins.

This really isn’t that complicated. I don’t know how you’re having such a hard time with it.

 

[Road Runner]

A minimal amount of fraud is not enough to change the election result, so the results will be legitimate regardless of who wins.

No, not really because the candidate isn't winning without some kind of fraud so I guess that just goes to show that every election is not completely one hundred percent to an extent including when Republicans win, but I see what you're saying.

 

[j-mac]

So you won’t accept the legitimacy of the election results unless your side wins.

You’re B.

How can you say that, I answered yes, I would accept the results of the election...What I did say is that my acceptance does not mean that I can't hold an opinion as to whether or not the election was on the up and up....

See, this is what bothers authoritarians like yourself. You don't want opinions that differ from what yours is, and because of that you'll lie about what I voted in your flawed poll...

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, not really because the candidate isn't winning without some kind of fraud so I guess that just goes to show that every election is not completely one hundred percent to an extent including when Republicans win, but I see what you're saying.

The minimal amount of fraud isn’t enough to impact the results.

Very few instances of fraud out of 150+ million votes. That’s just math.

 

[j-mac]

A minimal amount of fraud is not enough to change the election result, so the results will be legitimate regardless of who wins.

This really isn’t that complicated. I don’t know how you’re having such a hard time with it.

X, let me ask you...If Donald Trump wins the Electoral vote, but not the popular vote, will you accept that he won the election?

 

[XponentialChaos]

How can you say that, I answered yes, I would accept the results of the election...What I did say is that my acceptance does not mean that I can't hold an opinion as to whether or not the election was on the up and up....

See, this is what bothers authoritarians like yourself. You don't want opinions that differ from what yours is, and because of that you'll lie about what I voted in your flawed poll...

If Trump wins, you will believe the win was legitimate. He won fair and square. It was on the up and up.

If Kamala wins, you will believe the win was not legitimate. It was not won fair and square. It was not on the up and up.

You’re B.

 

[berg80]

It’s time for Americans to grow up and accept the reality that your favorite candidate isn’t always going to win.

False equivalence alert. trump is the only presidential candidate to ever suggest there is widespread fraud or to refuse to concede losing to the winning candidate after the election. IOW, it's a MAGA thing.

 

[XponentialChaos]

X, let me ask you...If Donald Trump wins the Electoral vote, but not the popular vote, will you accept that he won the election?

Yes. Just as he legitimately won in 2016.

 

[j-mac]

If Trump wins, you will believe the win was legitimate. He won fair and square. It was on the up and up.

If Kamala wins, you will believe the win was not legitimate. It was not won fair and square. It was not on the up and up.

You’re B.

I'll wait to see what happens...How about you? If Trump wins through the Electoral College, will you accept the results?

Or, will you, as you did in 2016, start bleating about popular vote, and consider him illegitimate?

 

[berg80]

Trump's pandora's box​

A growing number of Republican candidates this cycle are refusing to concede elections they indisputably lost, promoting conspiracy theories about the results and engaging in local battles over certification.

Loading…

www.axios.com

 

[j-mac]

Trump's pandora's box​

A growing number of Republican candidates this cycle are refusing to concede elections they indisputably lost, promoting conspiracy theories about the results and engaging in local battles over certification.

Loading…

www.axios.com

Conspiracies can only find life when one side or the other withholds facts.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I'll wait to see what happens...

You’re B. You will accept the legitimacy of the elections you win and question the legitimacy of the elections you lose.

How about you? If Trump wins through the Electoral College, will you accept the results?

Yes.

Or, will you, as you did in 2016, start bleating about popular vote, and consider him illegitimate?

Show me where I ever considered his win illegitimate.

 

[berg80]

I'll wait to see what happens...How about you? If Trump wins through the Electoral College, will you accept the results?

Or, will you, as you did in 2016, start bleating about popular vote, and consider him illegitimate?

Hillary's comments about illegitimacy had to do with the help trump received from Russia. They were made months after the election and thus months after she conceded.

 

[berg80]

Conspiracies can only find life when one side or the other withholds facts.

That's horseshit. What facts were withheld to justify the accusations about bamboo in the ballot paper or Italian satellites changing votes?

 

[j-mac]

You’re B. You will accept the legitimacy of the elections you win and question the legitimacy of the elections you lose.

No, I answered A to your question....quit lying.

Yes.

Just as you don't believe me, I don't believe you...Now what?

Show me where I ever considered his win illegitimate.

You know as well as I do, that a search from 8 years ago would be futile....So, I guess you can say whatever you want....Doesn't mean I have to believe you.

 

[j-mac]

Hillary's comments about illegitimacy had to do with the help trump received from Russia. They were made months after the election and thus months after she conceded.

Not going to rehash the Russia hoax....It's already been debunked....

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, I answered A to your question....quit lying.

You selected A. You also indicated that you would only accept the legitimacy of the election results if Trump wins, which is what is described by B, not A. You’re B.

Just as you don't believe me, I don't believe you...Now what?

It doesn’t matter. I’m simply explaining to you that your response is better described as B, not A. “I will accept the results except I will question the legitimacy of the results if Kamala wins” is clearly B, not A.

You know as well as I do, that a search from 8 years ago would be futile....So, I guess you can say whatever you want....Doesn't mean I have to believe you.

I don’t know why you would make accusations that you have no evidence for and can’t back up. You simply believe what you want to believe despite what the evidence indicates. You want Trump’s victory to be legitimate, so you will believe that. You want to believe Democrat victories will be due to fraud, so you will believe that.

 

[playtime]

yes.

 

[playtime]

He is trolling. This account is run by a 70IQ British cigarette. Not worth your time.

He knows his side is about to lose badly

donny the losing loser from mcLoser town is gonna
loooooOOOOOOOOooooossssssssseeeeeeee.......

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

donny the losing loser from mcLoser town is gonna
loooooOOOOOOOOooooossssssssseeeeeeee.......

Not what I am talking about. I said I would support the election results. He says I am lying. I am Swearing on my kids that I will. He is a troll and a very dumb one