Will this require a call from Obama and DoJ as a "hate crime"???

[Clementine]

The victim was White, therefore no hate crime.

that's funny given that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black teens.

Oh geez, so it's okay if the black teen walks up to an old lady and knocks her the **** out? Hey, let's just preclude the possibility that any black person can commit a criminal offense and pin his folly on the white man.

Where do you get your logic?

There is no logic. Race baiters only know how to bash all white people and blame them for everything.

Plus, the fact that the poster claimed that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill black teens is so wrong. Defending yourself is okay. Murder is not. Shame some are incapable of understanding the difference.

Ganging up on a person and beating them while shouting things that clearly indicate the attack is prompted simply by the victim's color is racist and should be a hate crime by definition.

I am sick of special laws being harder on people who happen to be white. Crime is crime. Hate is hate. Hate crime is just a law that allows the race baiters to strike out at the whites and give them harsh penalties. Normally, it is not necessary to determine motive for crimes and the reason is because you can't do that. No one can read minds, yet they attempt to and, of course, think they can do so accurately. In this case, the things the attackers shouted was a good clue as to why they were doing that. Yet, the left will treat it as some minor crime. They probably like it when this happens because they believe all whites should suffer over the sins of our forefathers and the sins that the left imagines.

These teens will get a slap on the wrist and there will be more crimes committed in the future by all of them. By refusing to denounce their actions as reprehensible, the left is more or less encouraging more of the same.

Now, considering that the left claims to be fair minded, I expect Obama to make a public comment any moment denouncing the actions of these young, hateful criminals.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The victim was White, therefore no hate crime.

that's funny given that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black teens.

Since that did not happen one must assume you are a retard.

 

[1776]

Those motherfuckers should be executed.

 

[healthmyths]

The victim was White, therefore no hate crime.

that's funny given that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black teens.

Since that did not happen one must assume you are a retard.

You and I know the idiot was referring to the Trayvon Martin shooting!

And I am sure you know this but this idiot doesn't know that IF Florida had rescinded the stand your ground law,that of 44 accused Blacks in FL SYG cases, 24 justified;

BUT if the SYG was repealed THEY'd be in jail! convicted!

And in 40 cases where Black shooting blacks under SYG, 25 were justified or 62%!
The efforts to repeal the "stand your ground" (SYG) law will mean MORE blacks will go to jail!

The law started in 2005.

After 8 years there have bee 135 FATAL SYG cases in Florida,

of the 135 cases were deaths were involved: 44 blacks were accused;

of the 44 accused 11 or 25% convicted; now in jail.

of the 44 accused, 24 or 55% justified ; THEY WERE LET GO.. If SYG goes away THEY WOULD BE IN JAIL!

and 9% pending..

By repealing the law, all those blacks found "justified" would be convicted!

Tell me you want more BLACKS convicted of killing because the "Stand Your Ground" law is repealed!

Stand your ground law, Trayvon Martin and a shocking legacy | Tampa Bay Times

 

[1776]

Liberals always make excuses for black scum attacking and sometimes killing non-blacks.

 

[paperview]

Read the case. It proves you're an idiot.

I did read the case. It proves you're the idiot. You go about bandying the term "hate" and "racism" to any white man who dares wrong a black man, but when the converse is true, you remain utterly silent. Why? Furthermore, the case had more to do with Mitchell's free speech not excusing him from committing a hate crime, which has nothing to do with the definition of a hate crime. My gosh, Carbine, you have no clue how to read case law, do you?

1. Mitchell was BLACK, you moron.

2. Mitchell was convicted of a BLACK ON WHITE HATE CRIME, you moron.

3. Mitchell lost his case, you moron.

 

[FJO]

'Mob of BLACK teens attack white disabled Army veteran in downtown Cleveland - "What they were saying was, 'Knock that boy out!' 'White boy.' 'Cracker.' They were saying, 'Knock that white boy out.'"
There's evidence of more violent Negro teens running around the heart of downtown Cleveland. A disabled Army vet spoke out about the latest attack that happened Friday, Feb. 7, 2014.
Matthew Robinson told our Ed Gallek he was riding RTA's Healthline when six to eight teenagers surrounded him on the bus, and then started following him.
Then, he said they attacked, took his stuff, and videotaped what they were doing.
The incident went down at 6th and Euclid, and the crowd scattered when cops showed up.
Robinson told 19 Action News, "What they were saying was, 'Knock that boy out!' 'White boy.' 'Cracker.' They were saying, 'Knock that white boy out.'"
The victim said not only did the group taunt him with racial slurs, they also videotaped the incident.

True News USA: Mob of BLACK teens attack white disabled Army veteran in downtown Cleveland - "What they were saying was, 'Knock that boy out!' 'White boy.' 'Cracker.' They were saying, 'Knock that white boy out.'"

Hate crime? Nonsense!!

Those innocent kids were just exercising and expressing their First Amendment rights of free speech.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is why Kormac and others fled this thread:

Summary of the landmark Supreme Court hate crimes case Wisconsin v Mitchell:

On the evening of October 7, 1989, a group of young black men and boys, including Mitchell, gathered at an apartment complex in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Several members of the group discussed a scene from the motion picture "Mississippi Burning," in which a white man beat a young black boy who was praying.

The group moved outside and Mitchell asked them: " `Do you all feel hyped up to move on some white people?' " Brief for Petitioner 4. Shortly thereafter, a young white boy approached the group on the opposite side of the street where they were standing. As the boy walked by, Mitchell said: " `You all want to **** somebody up? There goes a white boy; go get him.' " Id., at 4-5. Mitchell counted to three and pointed in the boy's direction. The group ran towards the boy, beat him severely, and stole his tennis shoes. The boy was rendered unconscious and remained in a coma for four days.


After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Kenosha County, Mitchell was convicted of aggravated battery. Wis. Stat. §§ 939.05 and 940.19(1m) (1989-1990). That offense ordinarily carries a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. §§ 940.19(1m) and 939.50(3)(e).

But because the jury found that Mitchell had intentionally selected his [WHITE] victim because of the boy's race, the maximum sentence for Mitchell's offense was increased to seven years under § 939.645.

Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 47 (1993).

It's really a shame that you people are too stupid to be embarassed by your own stupidity.

 

[natstew]

The victim was White, therefore no hate crime.

that's funny given that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black teens.

Who on the right thinks it's okay to "stalk and kill unarmed black teens"?

Oh.......Trayvon Martin? The black thug who was stalking the neighborhood looking for easy houses to break into? The Trayvon Martin who unprovokedly attacked George Zimmerman and would have killed him if Zimmerman had been unarmed?

Self defense is now a Hate Crime?

 

[RoadVirus]

Yeah, liberals don't know what real hate crimes are, do they?

Sure they do. In the world of Liberals, a hate crime is disagreeing with Obama.

 

[RoadVirus]

The victim was White, therefore no hate crime.

that's funny given that the right thinks it's ok to stalk and kill unarmed black teens.

The same unarmed Black teen that was pounding the guy's head into the pavement?

 

[eagle7_31]

Yeah, liberals don't know what real hate crimes are, do they?

Since you're pretending you study law, I suggest you read this:

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Or here: Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 47 (1993).

Guess that kills anything resembling 'equal protection'.