1. He's not qualified to be president.
2. She's way out of his league on policy.
3. He knows nothing and doesn't care to learn.
What's the point?
The so-called "liberal" media would go after her if she didn't get in the ring with him and go a few rounds, just for entertainment sake.
The Bottom line:
The GOP failed to nominate a viable qualified candidate, why should that be Hilary's problem?
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”
G.C.
The point is people don't believe hacks. If he and she are the things you say, let them prove it.
I pointed out 3 facts that are universally accepted by everyone except the fringe-right -- Trump's base = uneducated whites.
Every Presidential debate of my lifetime had two candidates qualified to run for and potentially serve in that office. The question was, who was more qualified?
Sarah Palin was a know-nothing, but she was able to fake her way through 1VP debate in 2008. However as dumb as she was, she had a tad more self-control than Trump.
Donald is not going to like being seen as stupid and know-nothing and will lose his shit and further embarrass America.
Ron Reagan was a seasoned actor who played the part of prepared candidate, he also ran California for a while without any major blunders.
Trump is not someone I picture sitting still for hours (100+) of debate prep.