Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Not if its inside the body of someone that doesnt want it. Once it leaves that sanctuary i would place my life on the line for a child.I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
Yet the US military kills innocent kids and it's not a wedge issue.......with an emotive tag line...I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
.. when a 5 week old fetus has a heart?
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
Since she has no kids because she has no sex, yes would be the answer..She was buzy and ask me to reply for her...Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
how do you propose the government could ever do such a thing?
![]()
you want a government rep to investigate every sexual encounter in the country?
Not if its inside the body of someone that doesnt want it. Once it leaves that sanctuary i would place my life on the line for a child.I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
.. when a 5 week old fetus has a heart?
Because no one has the right to the use of another person's body without their permission.
SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled and reaffirmed a woman's right to choose in the first trimester.
this is about the zillionth time i've posted this info on this forum, but here you go...
In a 7-2 decision written by Justice Harry Blackmun (who was chosen because of his prior experience as counsel to the Mayo Clinic), the Court ruled that the Texas statute violated Jane Roe's constitutional right to privacy. The Court argued that the Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's "zone of privacy" against state laws and cited past cases ruling that marriage, contraception, and child rearing are activities covered in this "zone of privacy." The Court then argued that the "zone of privacy" was "broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." This decision involved myriad physical, psychological, and economic stresses a pregnant woman must face.
Because abortions lie within a pregnant woman's "zone of privacy," the abortion decision "and its effectuation" are fundamental rights that are protected by the Constitution from regulation by the states...
The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Roe v. Wade 1973 PBS
The life means just as much. The point is that its none of my business until it ceases using the womans body as a host without permission.Not if its inside the body of someone that doesnt want it. Once it leaves that sanctuary i would place my life on the line for a child.I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
So, the life doesn't mean as much while it's developing and inside someone else? Or do you view it only a "semi-life" or, since the laws says it's OK to do it, it's on her conscience and we can wash our hands of it?
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
how do you propose the government could ever do such a thing?
![]()
you want a government rep to investigate every sexual encounter in the country?
Oh, so the life inside has no rights... we just get to make life and take it away, because it's inconvenient....
The life means just as much. The point is that its none of my business until it ceases using the womans body as a host without permission.Not if its inside the body of someone that doesnt want it. Once it leaves that sanctuary i would place my life on the line for a child.I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
So, the life doesn't mean as much while it's developing and inside someone else? Or do you view it only a "semi-life" or, since the laws says it's OK to do it, it's on her conscience and we can wash our hands of it?
Oh, so the life inside has no rights... we just get to make life and take it away, because it's inconvenient....
...the Court argued that prenatal life was not within the definition of "persons" as used and protected in the U.S. Constitution and that America's criminal and civil laws only sometimes regard fetuses as persons deserving protection.
The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Roe v. Wade 1973 PBS
![]()
No, I just think willful killing of defenseless human beings should be illegal.
The life means just as much. The point is that its none of my business until it ceases using the womans body as a host without permission.Not if its inside the body of someone that doesnt want it. Once it leaves that sanctuary i would place my life on the line for a child.I dont support abortion but I wont fight against it because its none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Don't you think it's important to fight for a human life that's defenseless?
They did not ask to be conceived....
So, the life doesn't mean as much while it's developing and inside someone else? Or do you view it only a "semi-life" or, since the laws says it's OK to do it, it's on her conscience and we can wash our hands of it?