If the Court said corporations are people, they are people, I never said the Court was wrong on that issue, I don't approve of the decision but then there is probably a number of Court decisions that I don't approve, but they are still the law of the land.
Sure there is. It is called the Congress and the President, who have the legal responsibility for legislation and treaties of the United States. There hasn't been an act of lawful secession as yet, so as a result it has never come up.Hardly. America is not an absolute democracy, meaning that if a majority in x state want to secede, they don't automatically achieve the right to do so.
Instead they have to go through the full process of appealing to Congress, and then the President.
Though if you are still butt-hurt since the civil war, here's a tissue:
There is nothing in the Constitution about a process for seceding. Your belief that such is required is purely a fantasy.
No he didn't you stupid ass. He said his job was first keeping the Republic whole . That doesn't mean he supported slavery . Your stupidity is almost amazing. are you inbred?
Hey dumb **** how do you think our nation was formed?
I think Bripat still believes that if a few conservatives got together with their weapons they could become an independent country within US borders.
Secession isn't a treaty, dumbass. A number of times bills were submitted to Congress to make secession illegal and they were voted down. Apparently even the U.S. Congress agrees that secession is legal and constitutional.Sure there is. It is called the Congress and the President, who have the legal responsibility for legislation and treaties of the United States. There hasn't been an act of lawful secession as yet, so as a result it has never come up.Hardly. America is not an absolute democracy, meaning that if a majority in x state want to secede, they don't automatically achieve the right to do so.
Instead they have to go through the full process of appealing to Congress, and then the President.
Though if you are still butt-hurt since the civil war, here's a tissue:
There is nothing in the Constitution about a process for seceding. Your belief that such is required is purely a fantasy.
I think Bripat still believes that if a few conservatives got together with their weapons they could become an independent country within US borders.
I can't wait till they refuse to pay their taxes, as the IRS won't give a shit what fictional fiefdom they call themselves. Nor will the Swat Teams.
Nothing in his entire life showed he supported slavery you idiot.
Hitler is just like your confederate heroes it is also why he lost
Most of what you post, so I don't bother to keep up.
Ignoring history again. A treaty in Paris acknowledged US secession from the British Empire in 1784, after the war of independence. And treaties have guaranteed the independence of certain states by major powers for centuries.Secession isn't a treaty, dumbass. A number of times bills were submitted to Congress to make secession illegal and they were voted down. Apparently even the U.S. Congress agrees that secession is legal and constitutional.Sure there is. It is called the Congress and the President, who have the legal responsibility for legislation and treaties of the United States. There hasn't been an act of lawful secession as yet, so as a result it has never come up.Hardly. America is not an absolute democracy, meaning that if a majority in x state want to secede, they don't automatically achieve the right to do so.
Instead they have to go through the full process of appealing to Congress, and then the President.
Though if you are still butt-hurt since the civil war, here's a tissue:
There is nothing in the Constitution about a process for seceding. Your belief that such is required is purely a fantasy.
Where does any document say it has to be "legitimized?" What you Lincoln cult turds have consistently failed to do is prove that there is the slightest evidence that the Constitution prohibits secession. The "precedent," as you call it, was a brutal invasion. Apparently the Nazi's set the "precedent" that it's OK to invade your neighbours and slaughter millions of unpopular minorities.
Apparently liberals posses the moral code of mass murderers.
In this thread you seem to believe you can't win a debate without calling someone a Nazi.I think Bripat still believes that if a few conservatives got together with their weapons they could become an independent country within US borders.
I can't wait till they refuse to pay their taxes, as the IRS won't give a shit what fictional fiefdom they call themselves. Nor will the Swat Teams.
If it wasn't for the stuff you make up how could you ever win any points in a debate?
He does.
