Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[danielpalos]

You are the one who cares about how much others make or don't make; wealth envy?

The law is employment at will.

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

 

[equalizer_0]

So are you sucking off them?

Apparently not. No money, despite being a legally adjudicated mental defective, having once upon a time been committed to a mental institution.

Or maybe over in the Middle East battling the terrorists?

IANAV (I Am Not A Vetaran) -- Oops, I need a hat for this one. I am not a lawyer, either. I need some sort of disclaimer or something like that. Look, dipshits, not even the VA is that stupid.

Or whining from your double wide?

No money. You think I get Section 8 crack whore housing or something like that, or I can "retire" on SS?

Long con? You are a C grabber supporter?

Long-running confidence game, if we have to be so precise about such fine matters. Otherwise I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Papageorgio]

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

Keep the gov out of my Medicare, as the trumpie said
Incredible stupidity.
I must confess as a corporate millionaire I've been sucking off the uneducated hard working rubes for years

Hey shithead, I don’t support Trump, never voted for him and never will. I paid into to Medicare and SSI and I am owed that back from the government. They forced that so I’m good with collecting it back. I’m not for some dumb ass sitting around all day while hard working middle class Americans work their asses off to support the lazy piece of shit.

 

[Papageorgio]

We have "safety nets", and those are great tools to help a person until they get back on their feet.

The idea that you want government to control businesses and what they EARN and then want the government to give to those that have not EARNED is socialism at it's finest.

The government has no business interfering with what an employee or an employer make.

I ran several businesses and several months I paid employees and did not get paid. I mortgaged my home as a risk for opening a business. Now, I have since sold the businesses but you make it sound like a business owner has it made. you have no clue, if a person risks everything for a reward, then they should be rewarded not penalized because someone that risked nothing wants money for NOTHING.

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

 

[danielpalos]

Not at all. That is merely the means, not the end. The End, is solving simple poverty on an at-will basis as a promotion of the general welfare.

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

 

[hadit]

You can EARN (daniel’s word) whatever you want, the LAW tells us so. You want to earn millions, you go ahead and EARN it.

I object to the government doubling the spending to support people who don’t want to EARN their money. Stealing money from working class Americans to pay for others laziness is immoral.

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

 

[Papageorgio]

Which is your standard BS for you getting money for not working and you not wanting to EARN your money. You want socialism to take care of you. I am fundamentally opposed, I believe you accept responsibility for your life and you go out and make it successful doing what you love to do, if someone will pay you for it, then you are a lot better off.

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

You haven't solved anything and you doubled the government spending, all you have done is create another layer of government an added more recipients of government programs that the hard working middle class will keep paying more.

 

[danielpalos]

how about, "earning equal protection of the law" under socialism, and converting it to capitalism?

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

 

[danielpalos]

That is your opinion.

My opinion is, promoting the general welfare means finding solutions to our socioeconomic dilemmas.

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

You haven't solved anything and you doubled the government spending, all you have done is create another layer of government an added more recipients of government programs that the hard working middle class will keep paying more.

Only the right wing never gets it

Maybe next Tuesday.

 

[hadit]

Again, you keep saying the same stupid thing and now we find out you don't even believe your own BS, you admit that money is EARNED, your words, not mine.

Also, the government giving away money to people who are too lazy to work IS socialism.

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

 

[Papageorgio]

Yours is sitting on your ass taking money away from hard working middle class American and giving hard working middle class Americans the finger because you think you are more important than they are. They EARN their income, you want to steal hard working middle class Americans EARNED income.

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

You haven't solved anything and you doubled the government spending, all you have done is create another layer of government an added more recipients of government programs that the hard working middle class will keep paying more.

Only the right wing never gets it

Maybe next Tuesday.

I have told you to go and pitch your idea, go ahead and take your arguments to court and change the law, I dare you. All you have is talk that is incoherent at best.

 

[danielpalos]

Public monies should promote the general welfare by actually solving for recognizable, socioeconomic phenomena; it is what social safety nets are for.

We subscribe to Capitalism and Capitalism's, Natural Rate of Unemployment.

It has nothing to do with a work ethic, but public policies.

Why not simply, deny and disparage employers from steak and lobster privileges and potential jail time, for any, non-sanctioned unemployment.

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

 

[danielpalos]

You could always cease work and be naturally unemployed. That is the difference.

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

You haven't solved anything and you doubled the government spending, all you have done is create another layer of government an added more recipients of government programs that the hard working middle class will keep paying more.

Only the right wing never gets it

Maybe next Tuesday.

I have told you to go and pitch your idea, go ahead and take your arguments to court and change the law, I dare you. All you have is talk that is incoherent at best.

I have a valid argument, unlike the right wing.

 

[hadit]

Because it's not the employer's responsibility to make sure you have a job.

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

 

[danielpalos]

How is that my Individual fault?

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

 

[hadit]

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

 

[Papageorgio]

Right and I would get nothing for doing nothing. I’d rather EARN my money, keep my money and be satisfied with meeting my expectations and goals. You can choose not to work and you get nothing, I’m good with YOUR choice.

so what; the point is we should be solving for simple poverty. You can stay poor as long as you want; but, not in poverty, because you still need to be able to be a good capitalist, simply for the sake of Capitalism, as public policy.

Otherwise, why not simply jail employers who don't hire labor, if there is Any rate of unemployment?

You haven't solved anything and you doubled the government spending, all you have done is create another layer of government an added more recipients of government programs that the hard working middle class will keep paying more.

Only the right wing never gets it

Maybe next Tuesday.

I have told you to go and pitch your idea, go ahead and take your arguments to court and change the law, I dare you. All you have is talk that is incoherent at best.

I have a valid argument, unlike the right wing.

Prove it, prove it by taking it to court, you keep claiming you got something, then get up off your ass and go to court and get it into law. You can make all the BS claims you want, however you still got nothing. So, do it or shut up about it.

 

[Papageorgio]

Because you don't want to take responsibility for your own situation.

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

 

[danielpalos]

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

No. There's no reason to do that at all.

The poor simply cannot afford to pay for it.

 

[danielpalos]

I am not the one claiming I have a job available.

I call shenanigans. You've been posting here about not wanting to work long enough for us to know two things:

1. If a job dropped in your lap, you wouldn't take it.
2. You're not looking for one, or you would already be working.

How hard do you think it would be for someone to find a job where you live if they were actually looking for one?

No employer is legally required to hire me; how am I not, naturally unemployed?

Because you aren't even looking for a job. Society has no obligation to support you.

Capitalists should be taxed for the privilege of a natural rate of unemployment.

LMAO!! You go with that buddy, why don't you go into the employment office today and tell them you want $14 to sit on your butt and do nothing. I'm sure they will cave into your demands.

Don't complain if someone comes up with creative excuses to go on welfare.