Why are "most" of the known news media company's against Trump and what does that mean?

Luckyone

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Messages
11,093
Reaction score
6,401
Points
938
Location
Florida
Most of the big news media companies are against Trump! Why would that be if Trump is doing so much good for the country?

Here are the names:

Trump Friendly - Breitbart, Washington Examiner, New York Post, and a "couple of evening opinion hosts on Fox News (Hannity and Ingraham).

On the other side of the coin, most of the big news media companies are against him:

Trump Enemy - ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, New York Times, USA Today, Washington Post, L.A. Times, S.F. Chronicle, Boston Globe, Miami Herald, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Houston Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Cleveland Plain Dealer, St Louis Post Dispatch, all major network late- night comedians (Kimmel, Colbert, Fallon, Noah, Stewart, etc.), and about 90% of Hollywood.

Even some ostensibly "conservative" outlets are largely anti-trump - most notably the Wall Street Journal and National Review.

That is 3 news companies are for Trump, and 22 news companies are against him.

Given that we support free speech and Trump won the election with 49.8%% of the vote, there should be at least 50% of the news companies in his favor. Why are only 13.6% of them supporting Trump?

This dichotomy also does not make sense when you consider the fact that news companies depend on watchers (want/need to be popular) as they depend on ad income, meaning that it is economically better for them if they support a president that has the majority (not the minority) of the people watching.
 
Last edited:
Given that we support free speech and Trump won the election with 49.8%% of the vote, there should be at least 50% of the news companies in his favor.
What a dork. Congress has made no law abridging the freedom of the press.

A bit of nonextortion extortion by Chump doesn't count if they don't complain.
 
What a strange, green coloured world you live in, Dorothy.
What a world of denial you live in, Mao.

Study by Syracuse University shows only 3% of journalists are Reoublican.

Sadly, liberals are all about “diversity,” as long as everyone agrees with them.

 
Answer: because journalists are almost all leftist.

Could it possibly be because freedom (and the Constitution) are more important than Aristocracy and bullying of the public?

Oh and by the way, one thing that is clear about most Americans is that money is more important than just about anything else. News media depends on watchers watching the show. If what the left is offering is not what most of the public wants, isn't that a money loser?

How many of these leftist media companies have gone out of business? That is a question for you?
 
Last edited:
Could it possibly be because freedom (and the Constitution) are more important than Aristocracy and bullying of the public?

Oh and by the way, one thing that is clear about most Americans is that money is more important than just about anything else. News media depends on watchers watching the show. If what the left is offering is not what most of the public wants, isn't that a money loser?

How many of these leftist media companies have gone out of business? That is a question for you?
No, it’s because journalists are trained at university where they are indoctrinated into liberalism.
 
Most of the big news media companies are against Trump! Why would that be if Trump is doing so much good for the country?

Here are the names:

Trump Friendly - Breitbart, Washington Examiner, New York Post, and a "couple of evening opinion hosts on Fox News (Hannity and Ingraham).

On the other side of the coin, most of the big news media companies are against him:

Trump Enemy - ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, New York Times, USA Today, Washington Post, L.A. Times, S.F. Chronicle, Boston Globe, Miami Herald, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Houston Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Cleveland Plain Dealer, St Louis Post Dispatch, all major network late- night comedians (Kimmel, Colbert, Fallon, Noah, Stewart, etc.), and about 90% of Hollywood.

Even some ostensibly "conservative" outlets are largely anti-trump - most notably the Wall Street Journal and National Review.

That is 3 news companies are for Trump, and 22 news companies are against him.

Given that we support free speech and Trump won the election with 49.8%% of the vote, there should be at least 50% of the news companies in his favor. Why are only 13.6% of them supporting Trump?

This dichotomy also does not make sense when you consider the fact that news companies depend on watchers (want/need to be popular) as they depend on ad income, meaning that it is economically better for them if they support a president that has the majority (not the minority) of the people watching.
It means they are wholly owned subsidiaries of the political class and are at war with the people of the USA.

In other words, they are sworn enemies of civilization.
 
No, it is because they WORK FOR the aristocracy, dumb shit.
Hold on a second. Media companies depend on ad revenue to survive, meaning they need viewers. If the conservative right is so popular (Trump won the election), doesn't that mean that if they want to keep (and increase) their ad revenue (by increasing their viewership), they would push and support Trump?

Why are there only 3 news media companies supporting Trump and 22 against him? Isn't that supposed to mean that the 22 companies are slitting their own throats? and if so, why hasn't that happened to any of those 22 companies?
 
Foreign Trump Hater sharing his "knowledge" of our country based on the spoon feed from CNN. :laugh:
CNM isn’t even American, and he’s on an American website lying about the biased media?
 
Hold on a second. Media companies depend on ad revenue to survive, meaning they need viewers. If the conservative right is so popular (Trump won the election), doesn't that mean that if they want to keep (and increase) their ad revenue (by increasing their viewership), they would push and support Trump?

Why are there only 3 news media companies supporting Trump and 22 against him? Isn't that supposed to mean that the 22 companies are slitting their own throats? and if so, why hasn't that happened to any of those 22 companies?
Ummmmm, hellooooo, Colbert was LOSING 40 million per year....hellooooooo

Is there anything in that skull of yours or is it all air?
 
15th post
Most of the big news media companies are against Trump! Why would that be if Trump is doing so much good for the country?

Here are the names:

Trump Friendly - Breitbart, Washington Examiner, New York Post, and a "couple of evening opinion hosts on Fox News (Hannity and Ingraham).

On the other side of the coin, most of the big news media companies are against him:

Trump Enemy - ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, New York Times, USA Today, Washington Post, L.A. Times, S.F. Chronicle, Boston Globe, Miami Herald, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Houston Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Cleveland Plain Dealer, St Louis Post Dispatch, all major network late- night comedians (Kimmel, Colbert, Fallon, Noah, Stewart, etc.), and about 90% of Hollywood.

Even some ostensibly "conservative" outlets are largely anti-trump - most notably the Wall Street Journal and National Review.

That is 3 news companies are for Trump, and 22 news companies are against him.

Given that we support free speech and Trump won the election with 49.8%% of the vote, there should be at least 50% of the news companies in his favor. Why are only 13.6% of them supporting Trump?

This dichotomy also does not make sense when you consider the fact that news companies depend on watchers (want/need to be popular) as they depend on ad income, meaning that it is economically better for them if they support a president that has the majority (not the minority) of the people watching.


This is really a dumb question.

The crux of the matter is that we have seen that when liberals infiltrate an organization, that they stop caring about doing a good job or even the survival of the organization,


they are about using the institution they have control of, to push their political agenda.

If their control is good enough, then their fellow libs don't hold them accountable for their failures and they are happy to ride their job and institutions down into ruin, if on the way, they make money personally and their friends all tell them what good people they are.


Note the way that the idiot that hired the woman that did the ICY LIGHT Delaney ad, never lost his job. He fired the women who he hired, who was open about her plans to focus AWAY from their traditional customers, but he never paid for his idiocy.
 
Most of the big news media companies are against Trump! Why would that be if Trump is doing so much good for the country?

Here are the names:

Trump Friendly - Breitbart, Washington Examiner, New York Post, and a "couple of evening opinion hosts on Fox News (Hannity and Ingraham).

On the other side of the coin, most of the big news media companies are against him:

Trump Enemy - ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, New York Times, USA Today, Washington Post, L.A. Times, S.F. Chronicle, Boston Globe, Miami Herald, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Houston Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Cleveland Plain Dealer, St Louis Post Dispatch, all major network late- night comedians (Kimmel, Colbert, Fallon, Noah, Stewart, etc.), and about 90% of Hollywood.

Even some ostensibly "conservative" outlets are largely anti-trump - most notably the Wall Street Journal and National Review.

That is 3 news companies are for Trump, and 22 news companies are against him.

Given that we support free speech and Trump won the election with 49.8%% of the vote, there should be at least 50% of the news companies in his favor. Why are only 13.6% of them supporting Trump?

This dichotomy also does not make sense when you consider the fact that news companies depend on watchers (want/need to be popular) as they depend on ad income, meaning that it is economically better for them if they support a president that has the majority (not the minority) of the people watching.
You should probably put off asking the question for a few days.

Trump's tendency to fuk around with foreign policy that he doesn't understand, has just turned his dreams into the real world of finding out

And dammit, it just had to be the black president again!
 
Back
Top Bottom