It was pretty much a draw. It'll change few minds.
MY NON-PARTISAN ANALYSIS:
I give Trump a C-.
I give Harris a C-.
- Harris looked nervous,
- she went off into euphemistic word salad epithets full of vague idealisms,
- she never explained why she hasn't already tried to fix all these problems that occurred on her watch,
- seldom directly answered questions,
- and she stood off making funny, mocking faces looking childish. She looked weak.
But Trump could have been better, too.
- He looked angry, probably because he hates ABC for their slander of him, and I'm sure he can't stand being near Harris!
- But Trump still fails to give clear, simple, well-worded, direct, cogent answers as he just isn't a disciplined public speaker! Instead he gets side-tracked, goes off on tangents and gets lost in circular, repetitive answers.
- He failed to point out to the viewer to simply ask themselves whether they have been better off these past few years or back in 2018, 2019 when he was president. This would have resolved who would be and has been the better leader.
- He failed to simply point out on foreign policy that the only time the USA has not been at war and the world at peace was when he was in office!
- He could have gotten over the issue about people eating cats and dogs in Ohio and feeding democrats talking points by simply saying that this is what he has heard reported in the news, instead of treating it as a known factual event. Now if the story turns out to be fake news, he looks like a crazy conspiracy theorist.
- He should stop taking credit for ending RvW and just point out that the SC did what was constitutionally required and that the president doesn't (and shouldn't) set abortion policy, so only has an opinion, but that ultimately, it is a state issue that should be settled by the people, taking himself out of the abortion topic.
- He failed to point out that the protest on J6 turned ugly only after the crowd was incited by the Cap police, and that he was powerless to do anything really as he couldn't go down there (he wasn't allowed) and just wave his hands yelling STOP! and it was impractical to think 10,000 people would be checking their cellphones during a riot to see Trump tweeting to stop, much less have listened. That implies he actually CONTROLLED the mob, which he didn't. The only solution was to keep it from starting in the first place by having the required police there to prevent it from starting, and Pelosi nixed that.
So the debate was pretty much a failure all around.
- The moderators failed to turn off mics at times letting both speak.
- The moderators got involved in fact-checking (trump) yet not Harris much (which isn't their jobs.
- The set stunk.
- There was far too little actual policy substance between the two.
- Harris started every sentence with the word 'so,' looked nervous, looked unprofessional and unpresidential, and did not instill confidence.
- Trump constantly looked angry, rattled, and he replies went all over the place on several subjects, often having nothing to do with the question, leaving the viewer lost what point he had intended to make, instead of simple, cogent replies.
- Harris seemed to bait Trump with accusations and it seemed fairly effective in getting Trump miffed, but he could have handled it much better by staying calm and clear.
In the end, it won't change minds, the democrats will regard it as a soaring success for Harris and the republicans will probably say the same of Trump but only the polls will tell. Fact is that if Trump is so bad, he still ties Harris neck & neck! Apparently Harris cannot swamp even a convicted felon! But Trump also missed a big opportunity to put her clearly away and looked frazzled, unprepared and unsettled instead.
What these two really need is another debate, another chance to go at each other, but I question whether Harris will let that happen. I know Trump would be all for it.