Who will blink first?

[rdean]

“Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit. He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal.”

Al Sharpton Threatens To Sue Rush Limbaugh | HipHopWired.com

This isn't the first time Al has made a Republican crawl and beg for forgiveness. If no apology, Al will proceed by the end of the week.

Who will blink first?

 

[Big Black Dog]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

 

[rdean]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

 

[Big Black Dog]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

What do you call what the Rev. Al Sharpton (sic) did to those white college boys in North Carolina when he got everybody all in an uproar over both his lies and the lies of that girl who said the boys raped her? He ruined those boys lives. I suspect that was a crime too or doesn't the "black" community see lying as an offense unless it is a lie about blacks?

 

[WillowTree]

Cannot wait.

 

[Meister]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

What do you call what the Rev. Al Sharpton (sic) did to those white college boys in North Carolina when he got everybody all in an uproar over both his lies and the lies of that girl who said the boys raped her? He ruined those boys lives. I suspect that was a crime too or doesn't the "black" community see lying as an offense unless it is a lie about blacks?

From what I understand, minorities are not held accountable for their actions.

 

[Dr.House]

Cannot wait.

The discovery phase will be priceless...lol

 

[Oddball]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

What do you call what the Rev. Al Sharpton (sic) did to those white college boys in North Carolina when he got everybody all in an uproar over both his lies and the lies of that girl who said the boys raped her? He ruined those boys lives. I suspect that was a crime too or doesn't the "black" community see lying as an offense unless it is a lie about blacks?

Let's just say Tawana Brawley, and leave it at that.

 

[Big Black Dog]

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

What do you call what the Rev. Al Sharpton (sic) did to those white college boys in North Carolina when he got everybody all in an uproar over both his lies and the lies of that girl who said the boys raped her? He ruined those boys lives. I suspect that was a crime too or doesn't the "black" community see lying as an offense unless it is a lie about blacks?

From what I understand, minorities are not held accountable for their actions.

Yes. I've heard that said before too. Must be some truth to it.

 

[sitarro]

“Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit. He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal.”

Al Sharpton Threatens To Sue Rush Limbaugh | HipHopWired.com

This isn't the first time Al has made a Republican crawl and beg for forgiveness. If no apology, Al will proceed by the end of the week.

Who will blink first?

HipHopWired????!?!!?!?! That explains so very much about you and your asinine opinions. How does someone even go about finding such a joke of a site........... are you one of those wiggers I've heard about?

 

[paperview]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

Sharpton is a public figure. His suit will go nowhere.

Limbaugh is a public figure. His suit will go nowhere.

 

[WillowTree]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

Sharpton is a public figure. His suit will go nowhere.

Limbaugh is a public figure. His suit will go nowhere.

wrong!

 

[pete]

Lets everyone sue everyone ... jesus fucking christ this is getting fucking pathetic!

 

[rdean]

I guess that "Turn the other cheek" stuff doesn't mean much to Rev. Al Sharpton.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime, IS a crime. Al said go ahead and call him every name in the book. But don't say he started a riot that ended in a death when he wasn't even in the state. That is a criminal offense.

Go Rush! Go to....

What do you call what the Rev. Al Sharpton (sic) did to those white college boys in North Carolina when he got everybody all in an uproar over both his lies and the lies of that girl who said the boys raped her? He ruined those boys lives. I suspect that was a crime too or doesn't the "black" community see lying as an offense unless it is a lie about blacks?

Are you talking about those poor boys who hired a "stripper" and got drunk and high? Poor kids just having good clean fun?

The truth is, regardless of what someone may have done in the past, falsely accusing someone of committing a crime IS a crime. If Sharpton falsely accused someone and then never apologized, he could, himself be accused of committing a crime. Since one didn't happen, the other probably didn't. You can't convict someone of something just because you don't like them. Otherwise, every Republican in congress would spend all their time in court or under house arrest.

 

[rdean]

“Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit. He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal.”

Al Sharpton Threatens To Sue Rush Limbaugh | HipHopWired.com

This isn't the first time Al has made a Republican crawl and beg for forgiveness. If no apology, Al will proceed by the end of the week.

Who will blink first?

HipHopWired????!?!!?!?! That explains so very much about you and your asinine opinions. How does someone even go about finding such a joke of a site........... are you one of those wiggers I've heard about?

If it's true, then does it matter where it came from? You guys are so sad.

Sharpton threatens to sue Rush over race riot claims :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Nation

Rev. Al Sharpton threatens to sue Rush Limbaugh over Wall Street Journal op-ed

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loca...-to-Sue-Rush-Over-Op-Ed-Remarks-64695877.html

 

[pete]

From the top link above

In a column published by the Wall Street Journal on Saturday about his derailed bid to become part-owner of the St. Louis Rams, Limbaugh accused Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of making comments that helped get him booted from a group trying to buy the NFL team. Limbaugh derided Sharpton as having played "a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot" and the "1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot."

The comments prompted a quick retort from Sharpton, who called both allegations false. Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot. AP

Inciting ... people get arrested for it all the time and arent present. Maybe there is more to the story.

 

[WillowTree]

From the top link above

In a column published by the Wall Street Journal on Saturday about his derailed bid to become part-owner of the St. Louis Rams, Limbaugh accused Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of making comments that helped get him booted from a group trying to buy the NFL team. Limbaugh derided Sharpton as having played "a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot" and the "1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot."

The comments prompted a quick retort from Sharpton, who called both allegations false. Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot. AP

Inciting ... people get arrested for it all the time and arent present. Maybe there is more to the story.

take charlie manson fer instance, he never murdered nobody.. and why were the blacks attacking the jewish?

 

[Zoom-boing]

This latest imbroglio about Rush Limbaugh being ineligible to buy an NFL franchise, because of a couple of alleged racial comments he made over the span of his many decades on the radio, stands out as one of the phoniest canards ever foisted upon the American public.

The irony behind the spurious charge is that they come from two of the most incendiary provocateurs in the race-baiting business. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who give themselves the ludicrous title of Reverend, have the unmitigated gall to proclaim that Limbaugh is a polarizing figure in the country. This from a couple of race hustlers who have been living large for several decades with no visible means of support except for the "donations" they received from corporations they've threatened with not so subtle methods of extortion. Using their race as a bludgeon, they begin by claiming that a company doesn't have enough blacks on the payroll, therefore they will stage protests and jeopardize the company's profits until it cries uncle and makes sizable "contributions" to the respective bank accounts of some very suspicious "nonprofit" groups. Add to that several instances in which these charlatans have thown gasoline on black - white incidents from coast to coast, and you have a clear picture of actual racism.

However, this is where we are in 2009. Sharpton and Jackson can make millions of dollars by parsing every word, phrase, action or thought and search for a creative way to connect it to bigotry. Every time they do, they expect white America to be intimidated into relinquishing something of value. Yet, when Jackson exhibited his rabid anti-Semitism by referring to New York City as Hymietown, that other laughable excuse for a member of the clergy couldn't find his voice. Similarly, when the bozo known as "Reverend" Sharpton gained national attention by claiming that a black woman was raped by three white men and covered with feces; a malicious and libelous claim that left him on the losing end of a lawsuit, we weren't entertained by the rent-a-protest mob frequently organized by that other jerk who masquerades as a man of God.

More recently, when a black woman charged that she had been raped by three white Duke University lacrosse players (another accusation that proved to be false) the country's premier race-baiters catapulted themselves to North Carolina as though they discovered a vein of gold in Durham. In a very real sense it was gold for them because it gave them another opportunity to use the race card in their continuous pursuit of self-aggrandizement and racial polarization.

You have to understand that if these guys didn't have the skin-pigmentation crutch to lean on, they'd undoubtedly be unemployed. As long as they can keep racism alive, these flimflam artists will not only continue to stuff cash into their larcenous coffers, but they'll be virtually impervious to allegations of corruption, since every genuine charge will be met by an apocryphal countercharge of racism. Even the IRS, who proved their puissance way back in 1931, by sending Al Capone to prison for tax evasion, has so far been unable to lock up these 2 gangsters. Several years ago, Sharpton claimed that blacks cannot be racists because they don't have the power to support discrimination and subjugation in the system. Some people may have bought into that reasoning when all the presidents had been white, but now that we have a black president such claims become obvious attempts to escape responsibility for black bigotry. As a result, an increasing number of whites are becoming fed up with the constant barrage of frivolous complaints that come from some of the most unproductive members of society.

RealClearPolitics - The Lucrative Business of Racism

Fuck 'em.

 

[Toome]

There is a difference between rhetoric and criminal accusation. Sharpton is a public figure, and, more significantly, he did make certain public statements.

If anything, I believe Rush may have more of a legal ground than Sharpton if it can be established that Limbaugh lost an opportunity to enter into a business enterprise due to statements made by Sharpton.

I can't believe that Sharpton is being this dumb. Well, wait a minute, yes I can. His true "colors" are coming out.

 

[pete]

Context: Sharpton delivered the eulogy at the funeral of Gavin Cato, a black boy from Crown Heights who was killed when a car in a Hasidic rabbi's motorcade accidentally veered off the road and hit him. In retaliation, a gang of black youths stabbed a rabbinical student to death, and black-Jewish tensions ran high. Sharpton said of Cato's death: "The world will tell us he was killed by accident. Yes, it was a social accident. ... It's an accident to allow an apartheid ambulance service in the middle of Crown Heights. ... Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in Crown Heights. The issue is not anti-Semitism; the issue is apartheid. ... All we want to say is what Jesus said: If you offend one of these little ones, you got to pay for it. No compromise, no meetings, no kaffe klatsch, no skinnin' and grinnin'. Pay for your deeds."

Defense: On June 11, 1992, after the Anti-Defamation League accused Sharpton of helping to incite anti-Semitism in the Crown Heights conflict, Sharpton scoffed, "You don't even have a direct quote from me that anyone can call anti-Semitic." Sharpton has also reminded people that he never participated in the looting and riots that followed Cato's death. In a June 29, 2003, Washington Post article, however, Sharpton took a more apologetic stance: When questioned about his past abrasive comments (which included calling blacks who disagreed with him "yellow *******"), he said, "I've grown … I'm not as brash. There are ways I look at life now that I would not have when I was a younger man from the ghetto."

The gaffes of Al Sharpton. - By William Saletan and Avi Zenilman - Slate Magazine