Where's The Originality????

[PoliticalChic]

What points? That the Great Purge equals the Jan 6th committee is a fraud? Did that derp fest really need refuting?

Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?

Dershowitz to Newsmax: 'Never Believe Anyone Who Is Not Cross-Examined​

Retired constitutional law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Tuesday that to be credible, witnesses must always be cross-examined, and that none of the Jan. 6 committee hearing witnesses has been.
''As a professor of criminal law for many years, and as one of the most experienced litigators, never believe anyone who is not cross-examined,'' Dershowitz said on ''The Chris Salcedo Show.''
''And none of these [Jan. 6 committee] witnesses are cross-examined.''

 

[PoliticalChic]

That only happens in shit hole dictatorships. Your compatriots are being imprisoned for crimes. That's what happens when you're a criminal and you get caught.

No vulgarity.....pretend you're an adult with the proper upbringing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Simply stated, the democrat Reich is simply Hitler's Reich reimagined.

Take any speech by a democrat today; replace the word "White" with "Jew" and it's straight out of Mein Kampf.

The show trial of the democrats is right out of Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR.

Nazis, Bolsheviks, Democrats.......birds of a feather?

 

[Curried Goats]

Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?

Dershowitz to Newsmax: 'Never Believe Anyone Who Is Not Cross-Examined​

Retired constitutional law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Tuesday that to be credible, witnesses must always be cross-examined, and that none of the Jan. 6 committee hearing witnesses has been.
''As a professor of criminal law for many years, and as one of the most experienced litigators, never believe anyone who is not cross-examined,'' Dershowitz said on ''The Chris Salcedo Show.''
''And none of these [Jan. 6 committee] witnesses are cross-examined.''

All of Trumps people were invited by the committee to speak on their own behalfs and all of them declined.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

That only happens in shit hole dictatorships. Your compatriots are being imprisoned for crimes. That's what happens when you're a criminal and you get caught.

Libturd privilege. However I'd kill myself if I had to be so lacking in integrity and honor

 

[Curried Goats]

No vulgarity.....pretend you're an adult with the proper upbringing.

I don't have a big enough imagination to envision a world in which I take you seriously.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well that's one hell of a claim there, Short Bus, but it isn't on us to disprove it, it's on you to prove it. Go ahead and take any speech by a Democrat and replace "white" with "jew" and let's see if this MadLib style evidence is frightening or funny.

PC already laid out the evidence to prove her point, and you Nazis respond with "Nuhn Uhn."

You are mere sheep programmed by your Reich to bleat the words of the party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats talk more about race than Hitler ever did.

Scary

Interesting that the Nazis gave the Democrats 'credit' for many of their programs.


The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’

“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

 

[jc456]

What points? That the Great Purge equals the Jan 6th committee is a fraud? Did that derp fest really need refuting?

I see you have no idea the point of the post. So you.

 

[jc456]

Well that's one hell of a claim there, Short Bus, but it isn't on us to disprove it, it's on you to prove it. Go ahead and take any speech by a Democrat and replace "white" with "jew" and let's see if this MadLib style evidence is frightening or funny.

well technically, the opposing argument would be examples of things the demofks did that's original. Is it really that difficult for you?

Wow!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, the demented LEFT are a crappy cover band without an ounce of originality.

Every Marxist revolution needed mass murder to come to fruition, I wonder what their take on that will be....

And the Marxists had an earlier model, too.

The French Revolution, under Robespierre interpreted violence as the ‘language’ that explained to the masses the ideals of the revolution. “If the spring of popular government in times of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror….Terror is nothing other than justice.” Robespierre speech, February 5, 1794.

For the first time in history terror became an official government policy, with the stated aim to use violence in order to achieve a higher political goal. Unlike the later meaning of 'terrorists' as people who use violence against a government, the terrorists of the French Revolution were the government. The Terror was legal, having been voted for by the Convention. Robespierre and the Terror | History Today

b. Sorel and every other advocate of the left, learned and understood this message.

c. Bolsheviks claimed descent: “Historians of the French Revolution, which the Russians saw as a model for their own…” Bolshevik Festivals, 1917–1920

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh, come on -- the democrats come up with all sorts of original ideas.

Remember, folks, this is the party that came up with the novel ideas that men can get pregnant, white babies are already racists, and burning, looting and murder are mostly peaceful acts.

Excellent!!!!

 

[Uncensored2008]

All of Trumps people were invited by the committee to speak on their own behalfs and all of them declined.

Just like All the Jews were invited to Hitler's camps to show they were vacation spots.

You Nazis are such absurd fools.

 

[Curried Goats]

PC already laid out the evidence to prove her point, and you Nazis respond with "Nuhn Uhn."

You are mere sheep programmed by your Reich to bleat the words of the party.

She didn't present any evidence I saw. Her pinky promise that the Jan 6 committee is directly related to the Great Purge isn't evidence to anyone but mutants and morons.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well that's one hell of a claim there, Short Bus, but it isn't on us to disprove it, it's on you to prove it. Go ahead and take any speech by a Democrat and replace "white" with "jew" and let's see if this MadLib style evidence is frightening or funny.

Let's remind everyone what a psychotic you are:


In answer to this….. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.





Now......which is your favorite?



“I don't know, it all sounds pretty wonderful to me.”

Understanding "Replacement Theory"....It's A Fact post #69

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Seems the Democrats can't come up with any ideas of their own.


1. First, they took a page from earlier socialists, the National Socialist German Worker's Party, who burned down their capitol and said the other side did it....

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to ...
https://www.smithsonianmag.com › history › true-story...
— Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's fire, conspiracy theories are sure to follow. At least, that's what happened in Germany on ...


The exact story of Jan6....send in agents provocateurs to cause the violence for which the Left/Democrats are infamous.



2. Then they hide their evil deed behind the "Jan6 Commission".....taken whole cloth from earlier Bolsheviks:
And their other cousins.....who tried political enemies on fake charges.

Great Purge

Soviet history
Print Cite Share Feedback

Alternate titles: purge trials
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

---

​

Joseph Stalin
See all media
Date: August 1936 - March 13, 1938Location: Moscow RussiaKey People: Lev Kamenev Karl Radek Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov Leon Trotsky Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda...(Show more)
See all related content →
Summary

Read a brief summary of this topic


Great Purge, also called purge trials, three widely publicized show trials and a series of closed, unpublicized trials held in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s, in which many prominent Old Bolsheviks were found guilty of treason and executed or imprisoned. All the evidence presented in court was derived from preliminary examinations of the defendants and from their confessions. It was subsequently established that the accused were innocent, that the cases were fabricated by the secret police (NKVD), and that the confessions were made under pressure of intensive torture and intimidation.
The trials successfully eliminated the major real and potential political rivals and critics of Joseph Stalin. The trials were the public aspect of the widespread purge that sent millions of alleged “enemies of the people” to prison camps in the 1930s.
READ MORE ....




3. And this.....

“Sex-Reassignment ​

People who were led astray by this social contagion are now retracting their claims.
Transgenderism is a word that refers to gender dysphoria. This mental illness is incredibly rare. According to Dr. Mariam Grossman in an interview in the documentary “What is a Woman?” the actual number of gender dysphoric individuals is between 1 in 30,000 and 1 in 110,000. And yet, the amount of people identifying as “transgender” has increased exponentially. According to a 2017 study by UCLA School of Law, the number has doubled in teenagers aged 13-17.

“Teens and young adults make up a much larger portion of the transgender population compared to adults. About 43% of the 1.6 million transgender people in the U.S. are young adults or teenagers, and nearly one in five are minors ages 13 to 17. This is despite the younger teen demographic being less than 8% of the total U.S. population. In the same vein, young adults 18 to 24 make up just under a quarter of the transgender population, but they are only 11% of the total U.S. population.”
It prompts the question: Why such a dramatic increase? Why in such a specific subsection of the population? The answer is social contagion."

Sex-Reassignment Regret

People who were led astray by this social contagion are now retracting their claims.

patriotpost.us

Clearly the Left's reprise of this:

The Disturbing True Story of the Pied Piper of Hamelin​

https://www.ancient-origins.net › myths-legends › pied-...
— The Pied Piper of Hamelin is more than just a fairy tale. ... 130 children born in Hamelin were seduced, and lost at the place of execution ...

J6 Reichstag Fire

 

[Curried Goats]

well technically, the opposing argument would be examples of things the demofks did that's original. Is it really that difficult for you?

Wow!

It's on you to prove your own arguments, is that difficult for you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

All of Trumps people were invited by the committee to speak on their own behalfs and all of them declined.

That's a bald -faced lie.

Pelosi Bars Trump Loyalists From Jan. 6 Inquiry, Prompting a ...​

https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Aug 3, 2021 — WASHINGTON — Speaker Nancy Pelosi moved on Wednesday to bar two of former President Donald J. Trump's most vociferous Republican defenders ...




A reminder of Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

PC already laid out the evidence to prove her point, and you Nazis respond with "Nuhn Uhn."

You are mere sheep programmed by your Reich to bleat the words of the party.

I don't beleive there is a vaccine for their recovery.

 

[jc456]

It's on you to prove your own arguments, is that difficult for you?

the arguments were put out for you to challenge. You didn't. No one in a debate must provide the talking points for their opponents, that is up to the opponent. But you didn't, you went to insults. so demofk.