Hardly worthy of my time. You wish for me to remove the covering from the syllogism underlying my conclusions, as a means of implying that in my failure to do so--to lay them bare for your examination, your asinine "side" somehow winds. I have provided all of the tools you will ever need to draw historical parallels between the lead up to the French Revolution and the lead up here and now, to a very likely coming similar revolution in today's America, part of which is social media censorship of Right based voices. Whether or not you can overcome the indoctrination or will even try, is up to you.
Interesting. In explaining your position, you seem to be trying to convert me to concede to a position that compares the government oversight of a Committee, established in 1793 during the French Reign of Terror, to a private sector platform of non-verbal communication invented over 200 years later. Do you sincerely expect me to accept this comparison as a rational, cogent one?
I would compare American Leftism disseminating ideology social media platforms such as Google and further, the de facto prevailing wind-law of political correctness, as similar in spirit to the earliest nascence of the Committee of Public Safety in Revolution Era France. How are they similar? Google (ha, ha) is your best friend . . . . but not for the un-whitewashed truth. Ironic, isn't it?
'De facto prevailing wind-law of political correctness'? Lol.

That is a dazzling word salad. Don't hurt yourself, wordsmith superstar. It doesn't seem to be a useful phrase, but good luck with it nonetheless.
No. I call for the equal representation of voices from across the entirety of the American political spectrum, even yours. Absent Google doing that, to the Bastille with them!
I've always agreed with equal representation across the board. Your argument has a fatal flaw in that you seem to have missed the fact that today's social media as well as search engine algorithms are based upon content from both humans and non-humans (robots). Thus, your comparisons are rather moot, wouldn't you agree?