What's coming for academia

Deplorable Yankee

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
19,410
Reaction score
19,805
Points
2,415
Location
DIXIE
One place that is about to get hit by the whirlwind is academia. It is possible that the entire industry of academia will be revolutionized and transformed over the course of the next couple of years. It should be. And, if Trump follows through, as I think he will, he completely has the tools at his disposal to do the job.

With academia, multiple issues come together to put the industry in a position of high vulnerability. First, of course, is that academia is almost universally associated with the farthest of the far political left, the wokest of the woke. Academics, almost to a person, have opposed Trump in everything he has proposed and stood for and have viciously attacked him at every opportunity.

The second is that nearly all academic institutions get vast sums of money every year from the federal government. Much of that is for bona fide research, like the search for new medical cures, but large amounts of the aid (nobody knows exactly how much) go to fund every sort of left-wing course and program.

And the third issue that makes academic institutions particularly vulnerable is that almost without exception they have been systematically and pervasively engaging in illegal racial and sex discrimination for decades. Some of that discrimination has been in the area of admissions, as was exposed in the famous case of SFFA v. Harvard decided by the Supreme Court in 2023. But that was only one piece of the illegal conduct. There has been vast other illegal conduct, going under the general heading of “diversity, equity and inclusion” or DEI, at nearly every academic institution and in virtually every aspect of their operations: in addition to admissions, also in faculty and administrative hiring; in creating DEI bureaucracies and enforcement procedures; in setting up various academic programs, majors, and departments (for example, the so-called “studies” departments and majors); in funding “cultural centers”; and on and on.


Unlike the New York times, politico, and the BBC
The Manhattan contrarian hasn't received a dime of funding from USAid
 
Schools that don't have most students performing at grade level should be shut down.
 
Two things: I think the better word is "Academe," not academia. The latter sounds like an illness. "I caught academia from sleeping with goats."

Second, the Federal Government has no legitimate role in education. It should withdraw, totally. Leave it up to the "states, respectively or to the people." Where have I read those words before?
 
Getting the Federal Government out of the business of guaranteeing student loans would really be a wakeup call for the extremists in academia.

I guess they have huge enough endowments that they could make loans, but would they be as quick to "forgive " them?
 
One place that is about to get hit by the whirlwind is academia. It is possible that the entire industry of academia will be revolutionized and transformed over the course of the next couple of years. It should be. And, if Trump follows through, as I think he will, he completely has the tools at his disposal to do the job.

With academia, multiple issues come together to put the industry in a position of high vulnerability. First, of course, is that academia is almost universally associated with the farthest of the far political left, the wokest of the woke. Academics, almost to a person, have opposed Trump in everything he has proposed and stood for and have viciously attacked him at every opportunity.

The second is that nearly all academic institutions get vast sums of money every year from the federal government. Much of that is for bona fide research, like the search for new medical cures, but large amounts of the aid (nobody knows exactly how much) go to fund every sort of left-wing course and program.

And the third issue that makes academic institutions particularly vulnerable is that almost without exception they have been systematically and pervasively engaging in illegal racial and sex discrimination for decades. Some of that discrimination has been in the area of admissions, as was exposed in the famous case of SFFA v. Harvard decided by the Supreme Court in 2023. But that was only one piece of the illegal conduct. There has been vast other illegal conduct, going under the general heading of “diversity, equity and inclusion” or DEI, at nearly every academic institution and in virtually every aspect of their operations: in addition to admissions, also in faculty and administrative hiring; in creating DEI bureaucracies and enforcement procedures; in setting up various academic programs, majors, and departments (for example, the so-called “studies” departments and majors); in funding “cultural centers”; and on and on.


Unlike the New York times, politico, and the BBC
The Manhattan contrarian hasn't received a dime of funding from USAid
manhattancontrarian? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Getting the Federal Government out of the business of guaranteeing student loans would really be a wakeup call for the extremists in academia.

I guess they have huge enough endowments that they could make loans, but would they be as quick to "forgive " them?
Yes.

The academic loan industry is a knife in the student body of America.

Get monetization out of higher ed.
 
Yes.

The academic loan industry is a knife in the student body of America.

Get monetization out of higher ed.
I see your fat black lesbian gender studies professor has
low IQ moron

Higher education should be free for everyone bippity boppity boo
dddffcvffffffffgggvfgg.png
 
Two things: I think the better word is "Academe," not academia. The latter sounds like an illness. "I caught academia from sleeping with goats."

Second, the Federal Government has no legitimate role in education. It should withdraw, totally. Leave it up to the "states, respectively or to the people." Where have I read those words before?
99.99% of education IS with the states now.
 
Get ed institutions back to education and out of making money off the students.

And, you DY, stay on track or be quiet.
Nothing wrong with making a little profit.. bilking the taxpayers and government driving up cost while simultaneously turning dopey kids in the lifelong debt slaves... That needs to come to an end

No you want free... taxpayer paid for full tuitions for all...
 
Nothing wrong with making a little profit.. bilking the taxpayers and government driving up cost while simultaneously turning dopey kids in the lifelong debt slaves... That needs to come to an end

No you want free... taxpayer paid for full tuitions for all...
D Y is so full of it. :)
 
Getting the Federal Government out of the business of guaranteeing student loans would really be a wakeup call for the extremists in academia.

I guess they have huge enough endowments that they could make loans, but would they be as quick to "forgive " them?
WHEREITSTARTED.webp
 
99.99% of education IS with the states now.
Eleven percent of K-12 school funding in Pennsylvania comes from the Federal government. During the 2021-22 school year, public schools in Connecticut received 8.2% of funding from the federal government.

Not 99.99%.

Sorry.

If Federal money is provided, it should be provided in the form of block grants to the States, based on a national $/student amount. My opinion, of course.
 
Eleven percent of K-12 school funding in Pennsylvania comes from the Federal government. During the 2021-22 school year, public schools in Connecticut received 8.2% of funding from the federal government.

Not 99.99%.

Sorry.

If Federal money is provided, it should be provided in the form of block grants to the States, based on a national $/student amount. My opinion, of course.
That opinion I do agree with.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom