What the science says

[SSDD]

No one is denying the role of the sun in the long term, but the magnitude of changes seen in TSI throughout the Holocene at least, are grossly overwhelmed by the magnitude of the greenhouse warming we've added to the planet in the last 150 years..

Sorry crick... there isn't a single proxy reconstruction that would support that claim...just more bullshit from one of the biggest liars on the board.

 

[Crick]

the end

Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Yes SS is full of poo. We all know this. If they are all you have then you are not arguing from science, you are arguing from science fiction and politics and nothing more.

And what is it YOU'VE got? WUWT, Watts, Monckton, Soon, Bailunas and a half dozen senile evangelical nut jobs.

 

[SSDD]

the end

Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Yes SS is full of poo. We all know this. If they are all you have then you are not arguing from science, you are arguing from science fiction and politics and nothing more.

And what is it YOU'VE got? WUWT, Watts, Monckton, Soon, Bailunas and a half dozen senile evangelical nut jobs.

Still waiting on the name of the proxy reconstruction with sufficient resolution to support the claims you have been making regarding the rate of warming...without such data, then it is clear that you are not arguing from science...you are arguing from science fiction and politics...nothing more.

 

[Crick]

Westwall, show us one single item from Skeptical Science that you've ACTUALLY refuted.

 

[SSDD]

Westwall, show us one single item from Skeptical Science that you've ACTUALLY refuted.

Show us one proxy reconstruction which would support your claims regarding the rate of warming....or better yet...show us one shred of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence that supports the A in AGW....

 

[westwall]

Westwall, show us one single item from Skeptical Science that you've ACTUALLY refuted.

Show us anything from SS that is not based on science fiction.

 

[hauke]

i think its a fail to argue with people bought by fossile fuel about climate change.
these people are paied to denie the truth science proves, they lie and disort facts.

to argue with them gives them more power then they deserve.

their moral values are in the pits they only care about the money they cash in their accounts, truth does not matter

just don t argue with liars

 

[CrusaderFrank]

i think its a fail to argue with people bought by fossile fuel about climate change.
these people are paied to denie the truth science proves, they lie and disort facts.

to argue with them gives them more power then they deserve.

their moral values are in the pits they only care about the money they cash in their accounts, truth does not matter

just don t argue with liars

Right, just show us the lab work and we'll take a look at it

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

i think its a fail to argue with people bought by fossile fuel about climate change.
these people are paied to denie the truth science proves, they lie and disort facts.

to argue with them gives them more power then they deserve.

their moral values are in the pits they only care about the money they cash in their accounts, truth does not matter

just don t argue with liars

You should definitely spend your money on unreliable "green energy".

It's the moral thing to do.

 

[westwall]

i think its a fail to argue with people bought by fossile fuel about climate change.
these people are paied to denie the truth science proves, they lie and disort facts.

to argue with them gives them more power then they deserve.

their moral values are in the pits they only care about the money they cash in their accounts, truth does not matter

just don t argue with liars

That's funny when it is you and yours who are the liars. Is everyone on your planet this delusional?

 

[Crick]

Just you.

When you take a position that is rejected by almost 100% of the experts, it becomes extremely difficult to accept your criticism of other's science or your accusations that others are delusional.

 

[westwall]

Just you.

When you take a position that is rejected by almost 100% of the experts, it becomes extremely difficult to accept your criticism of other's science or your accusations that others are delusional.

When the experts get 100% of their funding by supporting fraud, they lose all credibility. That's why Appeals to Authority are classified as logic fails.

 

[LaDexter]

When you take a position that is rejected by almost 100% of the experts

Crick's life philosophy:

Parrot "the experts"
Parrot "the experts"
Parrot "the experts"
Parrot "the experts"
Parrot "the experts"



Who are "The Experts?"

Whoever is LEFT WING and TAXPAYER FUNDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[hauke]

as i said they are liars without any respect to science, only theire lies matter

point : do those people ever give any evidence to theire lies ?

 

[LaDexter]

We went to court in 2007, so there was an exhibit of "your evidence vs. mine..."

How'd your FRAUD side do there???

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’


And what are those inaccuracies?

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

That's 90% of Earth ice INCREASING.... and your "evidence" is???

LOL!!

that YOUR SIDE WAS TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL THE VERDICT!!!!!!!!!

 

[hauke]

your using a propaganda film as a dispute to science, that film was not science

whatever, your not accesible to reason anyway

 

[LaDexter]

What was disputed in the court room WAS SCIENCE, your side LOST and WAS TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL.


90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is GROWING.

Deal with it...

 

[westwall]

as i said they are liars without any respect to science, only theire lies matter

point : do those people ever give any evidence to theire lies ?

You are correct. It is YOU who are ignoring the science. YOU rely on people who have concocted computer models that are so poor that they always show warming no matter what numbers you plug into them. YOU rely on "studies" that use zero empirical data. YOU listen to people who have violated the Scientific Method at every turn. You are a propagandist with no regard for science or the scientific method. You are a fraud.

 

[westwall]

your using a propaganda film as a dispute to science, that film was not science

whatever, your not accesible to reason anyway

I bet you think that Al Gore "An Inconvenient Truth" is the height of quality, even though it has ELEVEN PROVEN lies in it.

 

[hauke]

please prove your claim that the ice in the antarctic is growing,

your claim isn t a scientific prove

its just hot air