'What the hell?' Patel mocked for thinking dead would-be Trump assassin would face trial

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
18,437
Reaction score
11,391
Points
1,280
Location
Twin Falls Idaho
This is amusing.
Apparently the head of the FBI somehow forgot that the would-be Trump assassin was killed....and was anticipating a trial?


Patel continues to show that he is in far over his head, competency-wise...in his attempt to run the FBI.


FBI Director Kash Patel caused yet another strange moment in his hearing in the House on Wednesday, when he appeared to suggest that he couldn't release any information about President Donald Trump's attempted assassin Thomas Crooks until his trial was concluded — even though Crooks was killed at the scene by the Secret Service.

Crooks, 20, opened fire at Trump last year while he was holding a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, taking the shot from the rooftop of a nearby warehouse. Trump was grazed in the ear but was otherwise unharmed, while one other person at the rally, local volunteer fire chief Corey Comparatore, was killed.

"Can you commit to [release information on the case]?" Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) asked Patel during the hearing, to which he responded, "As soon as the trial's over."

ALSO READ: 'Fog of war': GOP senators excuse Kash Patel's FBI bungles in Charlie Kirk case

This confused response, posted to X by CBS News justice correspondent Scott MacFarlane, drew a swift reaction from commenters on social media.
"What the hell?" wrote attorney Tracey Gallagher. "He was what a 'real' prosecutor and public defender you can't make this s--- up."
"Absolute clown show," wrote liberal podcaster Tony Michaels.

"Patel is so spectacularly unprepared for these hearings that as serious as they are, it's really kind of hysterical," wrote Wisconsin area combat veteran and trader Matthew Spira.

"How embarrassing," wrote actor Jim Wito. "Kash Patel doesn’t even realize they don’t hold trials for dead people. There will be no trial."
 
Stupid people post stupid shit from stupid sources.

There are multiple investigations still going on and the Father could still be held liable because it was his rifle.

We'd still like to know what his motivation was other than being stupid as ****, dick-sucking dimocrap pile of shit. Like all dimocrap scum are. There was also bomb-material in the house and we'd like to know where that came from. We'd also like to know how and why SS and Local LEO's screwed the pooch.

Kash used the word 'trial' instead of the word 'investigation'. Go back to your Marvel Comic book and let the adults talk.

You're just not a very intelligent human being. Go away.
 
Stupid people post stupid shit from stupid sources.

There are multiple investigations still going on and the Father could still be held liable because it was his rifle.

We'd still like to know what his motivation was other than being stupid as ****, dick-sucking dimocrap pile of shit. Like all dimocrap scum are. There was also bomb-material in the house and we'd like to know where that came from. We'd also like to know how and why SS and Local LEO's screwed the poosch.

He

Kash used the word 'trial' instead of the word 'investigation'. Go back to your Marvel Comic book and let the adults talk.

You're just not a very intelligent human being. Go away.
Fleegle:

1000005436.gif
 
Patel was nominated for the sole reason that he was Trump's archivist and who better to keep yourself from being prosecuted over all those classified docs than the guy who was in charge of those illegally retained classified docs.
 
This is amusing.
Apparently the head of the FBI somehow forgot that the would-be Trump assassin was killed....and was anticipating a trial?


Patel continues to show that he is in far over his head, competency-wise...in his attempt to run the FBI.


FBI Director Kash Patel caused yet another strange moment in his hearing in the House on Wednesday, when he appeared to suggest that he couldn't release any information about President Donald Trump's attempted assassin Thomas Crooks until his trial was concluded — even though Crooks was killed at the scene by the Secret Service.

Crooks, 20, opened fire at Trump last year while he was holding a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, taking the shot from the rooftop of a nearby warehouse. Trump was grazed in the ear but was otherwise unharmed, while one other person at the rally, local volunteer fire chief Corey Comparatore, was killed.

"Can you commit to [release information on the case]?" Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) asked Patel during the hearing, to which he responded, "As soon as the trial's over."

ALSO READ: 'Fog of war': GOP senators excuse Kash Patel's FBI bungles in Charlie Kirk case

This confused response, posted to X by CBS News justice correspondent Scott MacFarlane, drew a swift reaction from commenters on social media.
"What the hell?" wrote attorney Tracey Gallagher. "He was what a 'real' prosecutor and public defender you can't make this s--- up."
"Absolute clown show," wrote liberal podcaster Tony Michaels.

"Patel is so spectacularly unprepared for these hearings that as serious as they are, it's really kind of hysterical," wrote Wisconsin area combat veteran and trader Matthew Spira.


"How embarrassing," wrote actor Jim Wito. "Kash Patel doesn’t even realize they don’t hold trials for dead people. There will be no trial."
Obviously he was referring to Ryan Routh
 
Back
Top Bottom