What "rights" does nature give us?

[NLT]

And you keep trying to consume my jiz, SniperFag, by your incessant whines to swallow my shlong.No dice.

I thought you were pro-***, now you are attacking him for being a ***? Typical liberal idiot.

I ain't "pro-***". Given a choice..I want nothing to do with them.

I am tolerant of fags.

Big difference.

You actually come across as a liberal warrior 102.

 

[JohnA]

NOBODY / person is entitled to any *rights *
you only have what you fight for and claim and /or what the rulers /dictators of the country you live in decide you can have
GOD fairness , respect decency etc have nothing to do with it .

 

[bripat9643]

Then allow me to remove all doubt. You're not following.

You obviously don't want to answer the question.

Why is that?

Because it's a retarded ******* question. Of course denying marriage rights to same-sex consenting adults is UNJUST and law in many of our states. Denying women voting rights was unjust too. Denying blacks full membership was patently unjust.

Can you dress yourself without help? How ******* retarded are you? Do you know that?

How can it be unjust if justice is whatever society says it is? If society says homosexuals don't have the right to marry, then according to you that's justice. If society says that a white man can own a black man, then that is perfectly just, according to you.

If you accept the theory that rights and justice are purely artifacts of society, then society is incapable of committing an injustice.

Either rights and justice are separate from the dictates of society, or they aren't.

However, you want to have it both ways. You want justice to subject to the whims of society so you can justify expropriating other people's property and income, but you want it to be something absolute when it comes to pushing your social agenda.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You talk about "one dimensional thought" and only ascribe the ability to govern or have governing bodies to one species on the planet.

How can anyone take you folks seriously?

Yeah, I heard there was a big conference where the lion laid down new rules, which in turn, upset the whole pride.

You're a serious dumbfuck, guy.

Yeah..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiv390s9-M8]1 Male Lion versus 2 Nomadic Lions, Big fight for the territory and pride - YouTube[/ame]

You should stop watching porn and maybe watch nature shows once in a while.

I must laugh, because the idea you're trying to put forth is absofuckinglutely one of the most ridiculous ones I've ever encountered.


Answer this, shallow: Why has man called the Lion "governance" a Pride, instead of governance?

 

[Koios]

You obviously don't want to answer the question.

Why is that?

Because it's a retarded ******* question. Of course denying marriage rights to same-sex consenting adults is UNJUST and law in many of our states. Denying women voting rights was unjust too. Denying blacks full membership was patently unjust.

Can you dress yourself without help? How ******* retarded are you? Do you know that?

So.. mob rule is great when it suits you.. then you get to scream when it does not about 'social' justice because it makes you feel bad... that is nothing different than a spoiled child wanting their way no matter what

Where when you have a right that is above government, and put above government in its construct as a natural or god created or creator created right... you have a 'justice' standard above the whim of government and the masses

Not at all. Here's how you can tell: I never posted anything of the sort.

That oughta clue you in (oops; unrestrained hope; probably nothing will ever clue you in.)

 

[bripat9643]

Leader and ruler are synonymous in societies.

No they aren't, moron. Sitting Bull is a perfect example. He was a leader, not a ruler. That's one of the main reasons that Indian leaders are so much more appealing than the politicians they were up against. Rulers are invariably scumbags. Leaders only retain their position if they have the respect of their followers. Who respects a politician?

Yeah; they are. If they weren't, you wouldn't have quoted me out of context.

Get a fuclking clue; perhaps it'll lead to you being able to dress yourself, albeit, you'll probably still fall down a lot. Unrestrained hope is folly.

No they aren't, and where did I quote you out of context? If the words "leader" and "ruler" meant the same thing, we wouldn't have two separate words for them.

You're resorting to all these ad hominems because you're getting your ass handed to you. You're obviously wrong. Anyone who's ever studied Indian culture knows that Indian chiefs had no power to compel anyone to do anything. Reality doesn't support your boot licking theories of government, so you lash out like a petulant child.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Too many spins on the Disney Lion King ride is my only guess.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

When will the Lion Government change the rules regarding how many Lions in the Government? There are a lot of nomadic Lions that would love to be in the Pride.

 

[Sallow]

I thought you were pro-***, now you are attacking him for being a ***? Typical liberal idiot.

I ain't "pro-***". Given a choice..I want nothing to do with them.

I am tolerant of fags.

Big difference.

You actually come across as a liberal warrior 102.

And?

He's a pretty stand up guy.

He's okay in my book.

 

[Koios]

Yeah, I heard there was a big conference where the lion laid down new rules, which in turn, upset the whole pride.

You're a serious dumbfuck, guy.

Yeah..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiv390s9-M8]1 Male Lion versus 2 Nomadic Lions, Big fight for the territory and pride - YouTube[/ame]

You should stop watching porn and maybe watch nature shows once in a while.

I must laugh, because the idea you're trying to put forth is absofuckinglutely one of the most ridiculous ones I've ever encountered.


Answer this, shallow: Why has man called the Lion "governance" a Pride, instead of governance?

Because like you, lions lack human intelligence and thus have not formed ordered societies, with rules and a governing body. It's merely aggression-based. Biggest mutherfucker rules. Ditto if you have more than one dog. The alpha rules.

 

[Sallow]

Yeah, I heard there was a big conference where the lion laid down new rules, which in turn, upset the whole pride.

You're a serious dumbfuck, guy.

Yeah..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiv390s9-M8]1 Male Lion versus 2 Nomadic Lions, Big fight for the territory and pride - YouTube[/ame]

You should stop watching porn and maybe watch nature shows once in a while.

I must laugh, because the idea you're trying to put forth is absofuckinglutely one of the most ridiculous ones I've ever encountered.


Answer this, shallow: Why has man called the Lion "governance" a Pride, instead of governance?

It's a superiority thing.

You wouldn't get it.

 

[Koios]

No they aren't, moron. Sitting Bull is a perfect example. He was a leader, not a ruler. That's one of the main reasons that Indian leaders are so much more appealing than the politicians they were up against. Rulers are invariably scumbags. Leaders only retain their position if they have the respect of their followers. Who respects a politician?

Yeah; they are. If they weren't, you wouldn't have quoted me out of context.

Get a fuclking clue; perhaps it'll lead to you being able to dress yourself, albeit, you'll probably still fall down a lot. Unrestrained hope is folly.

No they aren't, and where did I quote you out of context? If the words "leader" and "ruler" meant the same thing, we wouldn't have two separate words for them.

You're resorting to all these ad hominems because you're getting your ass handed to you. You're obviously wrong. Anyone who's ever studied Indian culture knows that Indian chiefs had no power to compel anyone to do anything. Reality doesn't support your boot licking theories of government, so you lash out like a petulant child.

Try to think back ... way, way back, to a few minutes ago, when you clicked the "Quote" button, and then deleted much of what followed my opening sentence, which provided the context.

PS: look up synonymous in your Webster's. It's words that are different but have similar meaning. No shit. Really interesting stuff. Like, for example top / pinnacle / zenith / ... tons of words that describe the same ******* thing.

Golly; ain't learning fun??

 

[TakeAStepBack]

It looks a lot more like a stupidity thing to me. I understand the animal instincts of the Lion just fine. You on the other hand, are a ******* extremely dim bulb, son.

 

[Koios]

It looks a lot more like a stupidity thing to me. I understand the animal instincts of the Lion just fine. You on the other hand, are a ******* extremely dim bulb, son.

Were I in fact your son, no doubt I'd be so ******* dim that I'd absorb the ambient light around me.

 

[Brawd]

With all this talk about "natural" rights..I was wondering. What are they?

Interesting things pointed out about locke's agenda

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4JsCEYpIUA]John Locke & Adam Smith "Private Property" &"Race of Laborers" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Yeah..

1 Male Lion versus 2 Nomadic Lions, Big fight for the territory and pride - YouTube

You should stop watching porn and maybe watch nature shows once in a while.

I must laugh, because the idea you're trying to put forth is absofuckinglutely one of the most ridiculous ones I've ever encountered.


Answer this, shallow: Why has man called the Lion "governance" a Pride, instead of governance?

Because like you, lions lack human intelligence and thus have not formed ordered societies, with rules and a governing body. It's merely aggression-based. Biggest mutherfucker rules. Ditto if you have more than one dog. The alpha rules.

Thank you for answering the ******* question.

And yet you turds are still arguing that a Pride is a governing body. It's not. It's the instincts that these animals have. It's not governance. It's natural order.

My natural order is to retain my natural rights. Where puke/turd, yuck mouthbreathers do not get to infringe on them, and they exist regardless of whether or not some actually infringes on them.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah; they are. If they weren't, you wouldn't have quoted me out of context.

Get a fuclking clue; perhaps it'll lead to you being able to dress yourself, albeit, you'll probably still fall down a lot. Unrestrained hope is folly.

No they aren't, and where did I quote you out of context? If the words "leader" and "ruler" meant the same thing, we wouldn't have two separate words for them.

You're resorting to all these ad hominems because you're getting your ass handed to you. You're obviously wrong. Anyone who's ever studied Indian culture knows that Indian chiefs had no power to compel anyone to do anything. Reality doesn't support your boot licking theories of government, so you lash out like a petulant child.

Try to think back ... way, way back, to a few minutes ago, when you clicked the "Quote" button, and then deleted much of what followed my opening sentence, which provided the context.

I followed the thread quite a ways back and failed to note any context that would change the meaning I ascribed to your words. You claimed Sitting Bull was a ruler.

End of story.

 

[Sallow]

It looks a lot more like a stupidity thing to me. I understand the animal instincts of the Lion just fine. You on the other hand, are a ******* extremely dim bulb, son.

That's hilarious..coming from you.

One of the dimmest bulbs on any tree.

That's why I don't fret about this notion of "natural rights". Or "god".

And why if society suddenly collapsed you'd be in a fetal position in a cave somewhere wondering where your next meal is a coming from.

 

[bripat9643]

It looks a lot more like a stupidity thing to me. I understand the animal instincts of the Lion just fine. You on the other hand, are a ******* extremely dim bulb, son.

Koios is losing his kewl because he's getting his ass kicked.

That's the problem with being a liberal. It's a difficult thing to find out everything you believe collides with reality.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

It looks a lot more like a stupidity thing to me. I understand the animal instincts of the Lion just fine. You on the other hand, are a ******* extremely dim bulb, son.

That's hilarious..coming from you.

One of the dimmest bulbs on any tree.

That's why I don't fret about this notion of "natural rights". Or "god".

And why if society suddenly collapsed you'd be in a fetal position in a cave somewhere wondering where your next meal is a coming from.

I see I've reduced this mouthbreathing puke/turd to his proper form. Terrible insults and a complete lack of a coherent argument.

Until next time, shallow. Stay stupid now.