What is the value of human life? ZERO according to Trump's EPA

JLW

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
18,269
Reaction score
20,137
Points
2,405
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?

Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the answer has been in the millions of dollars. The higher the value, the more the government has required businesses to spend on their operations to prevent a single death.

But for the first time ever, at the Environmental Protection Agency the answer is effectively zero dollars.

Last week, the E.P.A. stopped estimating the monetary value of lives saved when setting limits on two of the most widespread deadly air pollutants, fine particulate matter and ozone. Instead, the agency is calculating only the costs to companies of complying with pollution regulations.

“The Trump administration is saying, literally, that they put zero value on human life,” Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University, said in an email. “If your kid breathes in air pollution from a power plant or industrial source, E.P.A. is saying that they care only insofar as cleaning up that pollution would cost the emitter.”

It’s a drastic change to the way the government weighs the costs of curbing air pollution against the benefits to public health and the environment. It could lead to looser controls on pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial sites across the country, resulting in dirtier air.


*****************************************************************************************

You and your wife get cancer because of toxic pollution, the Trump Administration says Who cares! So long as profits of big polluting corporations are not hurt, the life of the American citizen is worthless.

This is Trump's America.

Always follow the money!
 
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?

Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the answer has been in the millions of dollars. The higher the value, the more the government has required businesses to spend on their operations to prevent a single death.

But for the first time ever, at the Environmental Protection Agency the answer is effectively zero dollars.

Last week, the E.P.A. stopped estimating the monetary value of lives saved when setting limits on two of the most widespread deadly air pollutants, fine particulate matter and ozone. Instead, the agency is calculating only the costs to companies of complying with pollution regulations.

“The Trump administration is saying, literally, that they put zero value on human life,” Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University, said in an email. “If your kid breathes in air pollution from a power plant or industrial source, E.P.A. is saying that they care only insofar as cleaning up that pollution would cost the emitter.”

It’s a drastic change to the way the government weighs the costs of curbing air pollution against the benefits to public health and the environment. It could lead to looser controls on pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial sites across the country, resulting in dirtier air.


*****************************************************************************************

You and your wife get cancer because of toxic pollution, the Trump Administration says Who cares! So long as profits of big polluting corporations are not hurt, the life of the American citizen is worthless.

This is Trump's America.

Always follow the money!

Sorry, but those derived values are meaningless when it comes to figuring out the true costs of crazy environmental regulations.
 
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?

Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the answer has been in the millions of dollars. The higher the value, the more the government has required businesses to spend on their operations to prevent a single death.

But for the first time ever, at the Environmental Protection Agency the answer is effectively zero dollars.

Last week, the E.P.A. stopped estimating the monetary value of lives saved when setting limits on two of the most widespread deadly air pollutants, fine particulate matter and ozone. Instead, the agency is calculating only the costs to companies of complying with pollution regulations.

“The Trump administration is saying, literally, that they put zero value on human life,” Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University, said in an email. “If your kid breathes in air pollution from a power plant or industrial source, E.P.A. is saying that they care only insofar as cleaning up that pollution would cost the emitter.”

It’s a drastic change to the way the government weighs the costs of curbing air pollution against the benefits to public health and the environment. It could lead to looser controls on pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial sites across the country, resulting in dirtier air.


*****************************************************************************************

You and your wife get cancer because of toxic pollution, the Trump Administration says Who cares! So long as profits of big polluting corporations are not hurt, the life of the American citizen is worthless.

This is Trump's America.

Always follow the money!
It's zero to the baby killing mafia of the left, we know that!
 
Stop using electricity and plastic
.

I haven't bought a new computer in 10 years. I don't own any other devices, with the exception of one ancient flip phone that I keep in my car in case of road emergencies in cold weather.

I use a reverse osmosis filter and carry my water in glass bottles. I don't even wear synthetic clothing.

I do use as much electricity as any single person uses, or less. I do only two loads of dishes and two loads of laundry per week. All my lights go out at night, with the exception of my porch light which came on when we had a house prowler in the neighborhood.

I use far less gas than anyone who commutes.

I recycle all plastic that my utility will accept.

I'm sure that every zoomer who needs the newest and fanciest of everything uses far more resources than I do.

.
 
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?
By itself a human life has no value at all. It only when that life is lived properly, within the parameters of morals, values and decency that life gains value, individually or en mass.
 
By itself a human life has no value at all. It only when that life is lived properly, within the parameters of morals, values and decency that life gains value, individually or en mass.
In the United States families of people killed may get paid a lot of money while in others for the same thing they receive nothing. May not even have a funeral.
 
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?

Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the answer has been in the millions of dollars. The higher the value, the more the government has required businesses to spend on their operations to prevent a single death.

But for the first time ever, at the Environmental Protection Agency the answer is effectively zero dollars.

Last week, the E.P.A. stopped estimating the monetary value of lives saved when setting limits on two of the most widespread deadly air pollutants, fine particulate matter and ozone. Instead, the agency is calculating only the costs to companies of complying with pollution regulations.

“The Trump administration is saying, literally, that they put zero value on human life,” Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University, said in an email. “If your kid breathes in air pollution from a power plant or industrial source, E.P.A. is saying that they care only insofar as cleaning up that pollution would cost the emitter.”

It’s a drastic change to the way the government weighs the costs of curbing air pollution against the benefits to public health and the environment. It could lead to looser controls on pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial sites across the country, resulting in dirtier air.


*****************************************************************************************

You and your wife get cancer because of toxic pollution, the Trump Administration says Who cares! So long as profits of big polluting corporations are not hurt, the life of the American citizen is worthless.

This is Trump's America.

Always follow the money!
And it’s not just Trump.

Republicans also support this sort of reckless, irresponsible deregulation, they don’t care who is harmed or dies.
 
And it’s not just Trump.

Republicans also support this sort of reckless, irresponsible deregulation, they don’t care who is harmed or dies.
Whenever I see the term "reckless, irresponsible deregulation", I know the regulations were bullshit and I'm glad to see them shoved into the trash can.
 
Government officials have long grappled with a question that seems like the purview of philosophers: What is the value of a human life?

Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the answer has been in the millions of dollars. The higher the value, the more the government has required businesses to spend on their operations to prevent a single death.

But for the first time ever, at the Environmental Protection Agency the answer is effectively zero dollars.

Last week, the E.P.A. stopped estimating the monetary value of lives saved when setting limits on two of the most widespread deadly air pollutants, fine particulate matter and ozone. Instead, the agency is calculating only the costs to companies of complying with pollution regulations.

“The Trump administration is saying, literally, that they put zero value on human life,” Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University, said in an email. “If your kid breathes in air pollution from a power plant or industrial source, E.P.A. is saying that they care only insofar as cleaning up that pollution would cost the emitter.”

It’s a drastic change to the way the government weighs the costs of curbing air pollution against the benefits to public health and the environment. It could lead to looser controls on pollutants from coal-burning power plants, oil refineries, steel mills and other industrial sites across the country, resulting in dirtier air.


*****************************************************************************************

You and your wife get cancer because of toxic pollution, the Trump Administration says Who cares! So long as profits of big polluting corporations are not hurt, the life of the American citizen is worthless.

This is Trump's America.

Always follow the money!
He was only refiring to democrats and unless they ripped it off democrats have no money, only a whining *****.
 
Back
Top Bottom