Gates reacted to a well documented bias by police, courts and prisons. It's a fact. Black people are still treated differently than white people by law enforcement and the Judiciary. The only racism Gates was worried about is the 50+ years of it he has endured and he is fucking well fed up with it by now.
Do you still put your teeth under the pillow when they fall out?
And wait up for Santa on Christmas Eve?
What we have here is the total and complete acceptance of mythology by an otherwise intelligent person. The explantion is that it is self-serving.
1. Do minorities commit more of the kinds of traffic violations that police target? This is a taboo question among the racial profiling crowd; to ask it is to reveal one's racism. No one has studied it. But some evidence suggests that it may be the case. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that blacks were 10 percent of drivers nationally, 13 percent of drivers in fatal accidents, and 16 percent of drivers in injury accidents. (Lower rates of seat-belt use may contribute to these numbers.) Random national surveys of drivers on weekend nights in 1973, 1986, and 1996 found that blacks were more likely to fail breathalyzer tests than whites. In Illinois, blacks have a higher motorist fatality rate than whites. Blacks in one New Jersey study were 23 percent of all drivers arrested at the scene of an accident for driving drunk, though only 13.5 percent of highway users. In San Diego, blacks have more accidents than their population figures would predict. Hispanics get in a disproportionate number of accidents nationally.
The Myth of Racial Profiling by Heather Mac Donald, City Journal Spring 2001Actually it's been studied to the nth since at least the 70's. That minorities committ more crimes, given. That the poor do, given. Question is why? That too has been studied to the nth. Well, it makes money. Duh. The real quandary is how to turn those focused on illegal to legal means of making the cash.
2. The black incarceration rate is overwhelmingly a function of black crime.
But in 2005, the black homicide rate was over seven times higher than that of whites and Hispanics combined, according to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. From 1976 to 2005, blacks committed over 52 percent of all murders in America. In 2006, the black arrest rate for most crimes was two to nearly three times blacksÂ’ representation in the population. Blacks constituted 39.3 percent of all violent-crime arrests, including 56.3 percent of all robbery and 34.5 percent of all aggravated-assault arrests, and 29.4 percent of all property-crime arrests.
Is the Criminal-Justice System Racist? by Heather Mac Donald, City Journal Spring 2008those numbers are and have been changing, with the influx of immigration, legal and illegal. Blacks have no more a predilection towards crime than any other group. Truth is, there must be support for the wave towards success. In a very wealthy suburb there was a contest on 'what it means to be an American.' My brother was one of the catalyst for, serving his community. The winner, got a trip for 6 to DC, meeting with his senators and representative. His essay read into Congressional Record, $20,000 scholarship, (7th grader), and $2000 cash. Granted it was raised by the community, but not unheard of such in poorer communities, as most was from DC or corporations.
3. Let’s start with the idea that cops over-arrest blacks and ignore white criminals. In fact, the race of criminals reported by crime victims matches arrest data. As long ago as 1978, a study of robbery and aggravated assault in eight cities found parity between the race of assailants in victim identifications and in arrests—a finding replicated many times since, across a range of crimes. No one has ever come up with a plausible argument as to why crime victims would be biased in their reports.
Is the Criminal-Justice System Racist? by Heather Mac Donald, City Journal Spring 2008Seems to me that while blacks, long hairs, hispanics, may be stopped more, so are 'red' sports cars and souped up cars. That doesn't translate into arrests, which I think MacDonald has found.
4. .” In 1997, criminologists Robert Sampson and Janet Lauritsen reviewed the massive literature on charging and sentencing. They concluded that “large racial differences in criminal offending,” not racism, explained why more blacks were in prison proportionately than whites and for longer terms. A 1987 analysis of Georgia felony convictions, for example, found that blacks frequently received disproportionately lenient punishment. A 1990 study of 11,000 California cases found that slight racial disparities in sentence length resulted from blacks’ prior records and other legally relevant variables. A 1994 Justice Department survey of felony cases from the country’s 75 largest urban areas discovered that blacks actually had a lower chance of prosecution following a felony than whites did and that they were less likely to be found guilty at trial. Following conviction, blacks were more likely to receive prison sentences, however—an outcome that reflected the gravity of their offenses as well as their criminal records."
Ibid.
I'm open to this argument, but my initial take is that much of the actual arrest/conviction stats have to do with the ability to pay for qualified defense lawyers. Public defenders are overworked, underpaid, and inexperienced. The more serious the charge, the more important the economic status of the defendant's family.
The difference between the poster quoted, and that for Gates, the professed (pun intended) belief has resulted in financial and professional gain.
I wonder if S.W. would like to share how the claim has worked for his benefit.