Robert Urbanek
Platinum Member
My local media is redefining “hot” to only describe triple-digit temperatures. On a day with a projected temperature of 103 degrees Fahrenheit in Sacramento, the KCRA anchorwoman announced “We don’t use the word hot unless it’s triple digits. She repeated the policy again at the conclusion of the weather forecast: “We’re not allowed to use the word “hot” anymore.”
Usually, when the corporate media gaslights the viewer, they don’t announce it. Perhaps the reporters were staging a small rebellion by announcing the change.
I can see two possible motives for the new policy: Boosterism to support advertisers and community groups who hold outdoor events that depend on sheeple to ignore common sense and stay out of the heat, and climate change denial, e.g. “It’s not really getting hotter.”
How would you define “hot”? I would argue that, at the least, it would be any temperature of 95 or above.
Usually, when the corporate media gaslights the viewer, they don’t announce it. Perhaps the reporters were staging a small rebellion by announcing the change.
I can see two possible motives for the new policy: Boosterism to support advertisers and community groups who hold outdoor events that depend on sheeple to ignore common sense and stay out of the heat, and climate change denial, e.g. “It’s not really getting hotter.”
How would you define “hot”? I would argue that, at the least, it would be any temperature of 95 or above.