- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,082
- 47,245
- 2,180
You are so desperate. Hillary, her law firm and Fusion GPS all the saw the dossier. The idea that Hillary wouldn't have seen a document she paid $5 million for doesn't pass the laugh test.Of course she did. She hired Fusion GPS, so she asked them to compile the dossier. Laundering the money through her law firm doesn't absolve her of her guilt. It only adds another crime to the charge sheet.Liar. You have no evidence whatsoever that Hillary asked for a foreign national to compile that dossier.Information is not considered to be a "thing of value" for the purposes of the campaign funding laws.
Just once in your lazy, incompetent life, you should google before responding. Then you might not make a complete idiot of yourself all of the time.
Opinion | Can it be a crime to do opposition research by asking foreigners for information?
first of all your cite is an OPINION, not a law. As we all know, opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Secondly, when a foreigner volunteers information, you did not ask for it.
Now, in the case of the dossier and the Clinton campaign, it was asked for and paid for. So you must support prosecution of her and her cronies. right?
Do you ever stop lying?
Evers??
With every post you dig yourself in deeper.
No SHE didn’t do any such thing. She didn’t hire GPS. Her law firm did. And even if she personally directed her law firm to hire GPS by name, she still had no contact with them. She neither hired them or spoke to them.
It is precisely BECAUSE all contact with Fusion GPS was done through the law firm that there is no conspiracy.
You should also look up the definition of “money laundering”. Using legal obtained campaign contributions to purchase research for your campaign, is the antithesis of “money laundering”.