What does Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, & Rush Limbaugh have in common?

All are college dropouts who have no work experience except radio and TV, have never held public office, served in military, nor worked in government. Yet their followers treat their words as gospel.

Also they all have 7 digit incomes. No wonder they are so concerned with higher taxes on the rich.

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glenn Beck - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They have earned their way to the top, as informed men of honor and passion, who join several other men of honor and passion, who held no college degree. Andrew Jackson,William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson and Grover Cleveland. All it takes is common sense, compassion and a desire to work harder and work smarter than the rest, for the benefit of humankind.
The Presidents you mentioned distinguished themselves by doing. Some on the battlefield; some serving in public office.
The three stooges, Hannity, Limbaugh and Beck are not doers. They sit on their big fat asses and critique what others do.
Even though none of them have ever done what the people they critique do.
There is no honor with these scamming slime bags.

Actually, they do quite a bit. They teach people over the radio. They encourage people to pursue their dreams and be the best they can be.
 
All are college dropouts who have no work experience except radio and TV, have never held public office, served in military, nor worked in government. Yet their followers treat their words as gospel.

Also they all have 7 digit incomes. No wonder they are so concerned with higher taxes on the rich.

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glenn Beck - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard after two and a half years and Steve Jobs: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300477_pf.html


PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Apple Computer Inc.'s CEO Steve Jobs told Stanford University graduates Sunday that dropping out of college was one of the best decisions he ever made because it forced him to be innovative _ even when it came to finding enough money for dinner.

It's called CAPITALISM and this country has been prosperous because of it. Men and women with ideas, who were free, to pursue them. Not oppressed from big government regulations. And just check around and see how many millions, the wealthy have given to charity. They could not have done that had they not been rich. We want the rich. They help the poor, if not through charity, then through entitlement programs.
 
They are Boring

Hannity is for sure.

Beck and Rush are usually pretty informative and entertaining.

Hannity makes me nervous, or rather, anxious. Talks too fast, dumb music in seques and dumb football throwing. I only watch him if he has a guest or pundit on, I trust to hear. I really can't stand his last 20 minutes with the "panel."
 
Because the three stooges make alot of money does not mean they are people of honor.
Think of all of the slime buckets who have made lots of money. Wall street is full of them.
These guys are closer to Bernie Madoff than Bill Gates.

They have high TV ratings but that does not make them great men. If you could put porn on public TV it would be the highest rated shows.
These guys are closer to Jerry Springer than Tim Russert.
 
All are college dropouts who have no work experience except radio and TV, have never held public office, served in military, nor worked in government. Yet their followers treat their words as gospel.

Also they all have 7 digit incomes. No wonder they are so concerned with higher taxes on the rich.

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glenn Beck - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In addition, all three of them are immensely annoying.

Aw! The poor wittle wibberals are whining about the guys kicking their ass again.

Let's put it this way guys.

If all that's true about them, and they still kick the ass of anyone on your side of the media, WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT YOUR SIDE?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Doesn't make your side sound too bright if these "uneducated" guys still kick all your asses.

But don't be sad. Maybe you can steal some more money from impoverished children and start another Air America!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Because the three stooges make alot of money does not mean they are people of honor. Think of all of the slime buckets who have made lots of money. Wall street is full of them.
These guys are closer to Bernie Madoff than Bill Gates.

They have high TV ratings but that does not make them great men. If you could put porn on public TV it would be the highest rated shows.
These guys are closer to Jerry Springer than Tim Russert.

I highlighted the sentence to which I am responding. My response was based upon my impression of them and had nothing to do with money. :) They are men making a positive difference to our way of life that is being, "transformed."
 
I think all political talk shows, both left and right are ridiculous. The host attacks the opposition with quotes pulled out of context, monologues designed to convince not educate, and authorities that are paid to support the host's opinion. Naturally, most of the callers or guest support the host. Callers and guest that don't agree with the host are cut off or interrupted with leading or rhetorical questions. Sometimes the host will get a caller or a guest that's a real loony. The host will then let the guest ramble on just to prove how dumb the opposition is. It's like having a trial with a prosecution and no defense.

How do you pull quotes saying "I'm a communist" out of context?
Easy

I never said I am a communist.
 
All are college dropouts who have no work experience except radio and TV, have never held public office, served in military, nor worked in government. Yet their followers treat their words as gospel.

Also they all have 7 digit incomes. No wonder they are so concerned with higher taxes on the rich.

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glenn Beck - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They have earned their way to the top, as informed men of honor and passion, who join several other men of honor and passion, who held no college degree. Andrew Jackson,William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson and Grover Cleveland. All it takes is common sense, compassion and a desire to work harder and work smarter than the rest, for the benefit of humankind.
Being good at what you do, does not make what you do a good thing.
 
Because the three stooges make alot of money does not mean they are people of honor. Think of all of the slime buckets who have made lots of money. Wall street is full of them.
These guys are closer to Bernie Madoff than Bill Gates.

They have high TV ratings but that does not make them great men. If you could put porn on public TV it would be the highest rated shows.
These guys are closer to Jerry Springer than Tim Russert.

I highlighted the sentence to which I am responding. My response was based upon my impression of them and had nothing to do with money. :) They are men making a positive difference to our way of life that is being, "transformed."

There divisive rhetoric helps their pocket books more than it does the political agenda they claim to support.
There schtick is ratings and money. They do not make more money if legislation is passed ands that is how the system is changed.
What they do hinders legislation being passed to help their side.
 
All are college dropouts who have no work experience except radio and TV, have never held public office, served in military, nor worked in government. Yet their followers treat their words as gospel.

Also they all have 7 digit incomes. No wonder they are so concerned with higher taxes on the rich.

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Glenn Beck - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They have earned their way to the top, as informed men of honor and passion, who join several other men of honor and passion, who held no college degree. Andrew Jackson,William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson and Grover Cleveland. All it takes is common sense, compassion and a desire to work harder and work smarter than the rest, for the benefit of humankind.
Being good at what you do, does not make what you do a good thing.

Bwahahaaa!

Who are YOU to decide what is a good thing?

Just becuause it isn't a good thing for LIBERALS doesn't make you guys the last word on the subject.

I think it's GREAT and it's a good thing for conservatism.

Boo freaking hoo! You guys don't get to decide that for everyone.

(That was always you liberal's problem. You really deep down think you should decide everyone for everybody. You always were Stalinists)

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Because the three stooges make alot of money does not mean they are people of honor. Think of all of the slime buckets who have made lots of money. Wall street is full of them.
These guys are closer to Bernie Madoff than Bill Gates.

They have high TV ratings but that does not make them great men. If you could put porn on public TV it would be the highest rated shows.
These guys are closer to Jerry Springer than Tim Russert.

I highlighted the sentence to which I am responding. My response was based upon my impression of them and had nothing to do with money. :) They are men making a positive difference to our way of life that is being, "transformed."

There divisive rhetoric helps their pocket books more than it does the political agenda they claim to support.
There schtick is ratings and money. They do not make more money if legislation is passed ands that is how the system is changed.
What they do hinders legislation being passed to help their side.

Exactly what do you think would "help" their side? This I GOT to hear.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
Being good at what you do, does not make what you do a good thing.

Teaching people in a way that makes people want to come listen to you isn't a good thing?

Entertaining people in a way that is bother fun and informative isn't a good thing?

Encouraging people to be self reliant isn't a good thing?
 
Being good at what you do, does not make what you do a good thing.

Teaching people in a way that makes people want to come listen to you isn't a good thing?

Entertaining people in a way that is bother fun and informative isn't a good thing?

Encouraging people to be self reliant isn't a good thing?

Umm I thought this thread was about Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh?
Who are you referring to?
 
Because the three stooges make alot of money does not mean they are people of honor. Think of all of the slime buckets who have made lots of money. Wall street is full of them.
These guys are closer to Bernie Madoff than Bill Gates.

They have high TV ratings but that does not make them great men. If you could put porn on public TV it would be the highest rated shows.
These guys are closer to Jerry Springer than Tim Russert.

I highlighted the sentence to which I am responding. My response was based upon my impression of them and had nothing to do with money. :) They are men making a positive difference to our way of life that is being, "transformed."

There divisive rhetoric helps their pocket books more than it does the political agenda they claim to support.
There schtick is ratings and money. They do not make more money if legislation is passed ands that is how the system is changed.
What they do hinders legislation being passed to help their side.

Unless you are planning to outlaw their ability to speak, how exactly is any law going to keep them from making money?

And how exactly does changing the system help anything if the change is bad?
 
Being good at what you do, does not make what you do a good thing.

Teaching people in a way that makes people want to come listen to you isn't a good thing?

Entertaining people in a way that is bother fun and informative isn't a good thing?

Encouraging people to be self reliant isn't a good thing?

Umm I thought this thread was about Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh?
Who are you referring to?

Hannity, Beck, and Limbaugh. If you listened to their shows, you'd know this.
 
Teaching people in a way that makes people want to come listen to you isn't a good thing?

Entertaining people in a way that is bother fun and informative isn't a good thing?

Encouraging people to be self reliant isn't a good thing?

Umm I thought this thread was about Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh?
Who are you referring to?

Hannity, Beck, and Limbaugh. If you listened to their shows, you'd know this.

You are actually serious?
 
The fact that the left is so obsessed with Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh (and Palin) tells us just how effective, and dangerous to the left's agenda, they are.

If these people were irrelevant, the left would just ignore them. Kinda how we ignored Air America. And Bill Mahr. And Sean Penn. Threads trashing these uber libs rarely show up.

Speaking of that, did you guys see where Sean Penn stated in an interview that anyone who calls Hugo Chavez a dictator should be arrested for slander? Ah, free speech and the left, gotta love it.
 
Umm I thought this thread was about Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh?
Who are you referring to?

Hannity, Beck, and Limbaugh. If you listened to their shows, you'd know this.

You are actually serious?

Yeah, he is. Thats 90% of their material. Being self-reliant, being moral, being responsible for your own problems, not waiting on the government to solve your problems, saving money, showing no preferential treatment to any one race or group of people but rather treating all as equals (novel idea huh?), wishing success for all Americans, supporting the troops and cops.

You know, radical right wing hate speech stuff.
 

Forum List

Back
Top