What Dims and Neo-Nazis have in common

[Votto]

You are free to call me what you like, but I am no Nazi.

But you certainly run cover for Nazis, by pretending Nazis are like liberals, even though all Nazis have always been conservative.

[QUOTEI reject a strong centralized government and have supported the Article V movement to restore Federalism that had been stripped from us during the Progressive era.

The "progressive era" apparently extending back to 1787 or so.

I reject a massive nanny state that Hitler created during his reign

The rest of this is loonytunes stuff, entirely faked stories about how the left is like Hitler. You're revising history openly, and that's very much like the Nazis.

So, let us know when you'll say the white supremacists are no longer welcome in the Republican Party. You can start with the one on this board.

?[/QUOTE]

No, Hitler did have a massive nanny state.

Here is a book on the matter.

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hitlers-beneficiaries-gotz-aly/1101411440?ean=9780805079265

Essentially, the Nazi regime centralized income that was sent in two directions, the military and nanny state.

For you see, Hitler was terrified of an uprising of the populace that occurred during WW1 because of the lowered standard of living.

To combat this possibility, Hitler made sure that the average German citizen had a higher standard of living than what people had in the US. He succeeded.

It is my opinion that Hitler simply bought off a war weary populace that was steeped in genocide.

 

[Votto]

I almost forgot, another common thread that the Nazi types and Dims have in common is their united efforts to defeat Zionism.

If Soros and his minions had their way, Israel would become the new Syria as ISIS would slaughter the entire Jewish population.

David Duke would be cheering in the background.

I hope you have room to include the author of the most used 'history' textbook, Communist Howard Zinn, and America-hating anti-Semite, Noam Chomsky, in that vituperation.

Whoever he is, he is just another empty suit.

Leftism has become the most successful ideology/religion in the last century, bar none.

I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky,

And I'm surprised that you did not realize Hitler had a massive nanny state. They incorporated the term socialist in their name for a reason.

 

[Votto]

You are free to call me what you like, but I am no Nazi.

But you certainly run cover for Nazis, by pretending Nazis are like liberals, even though all Nazis have always been conservative.

I reject a strong centralized government and have supported the Article V movement to restore Federalism that had been stripped from us during the Progressive era.

The "progressive era" apparently extending back to 1787 or so.

I reject a massive nanny state that Hitler created during his reign

The rest of this is loonytunes stuff, entirely faked stories about how the left is like Hitler. You're revising history openly, and that's very much like the Nazis.

So, let us know when you'll say the white supremacists are no longer welcome in the Republican Party. You can start with the one on this board.

Nazis are like conservatives? Really? Do tell. How are they? Is it because they were racists and all conservatives are racist?

Brilliant!

The Progressive era started much earlier? Well the most damage was done with Progs amended the Constitution to allow for a federal income tax and the creation of the Fed. That gave them all the power they needed to destroy Federalism.

The icing on the cake was abandoning the gold standard. Now its all monopoly money as they throw money at every man, woman, and child on the planet to get their way.

 

[jc456]

100% of the Nazis in the USA are staunch Republicans, and they all loudly sing the praises of Trump

Just like Votto.

None of the righties here want to kick the Nazis and white supremacists out of their party. After all, Republicans can't win elections without the votes of their white supremacist base, so they have to kiss up to Nazis.

a declaration only you get to make is that it? let me dump on that one then.

tooth said so so it must be true. LOL, even though occupy wall street was with who? hmmmmmmm... socialsts, anti capitalists? your what hurts?

 

[mamooth]

Nazis are like conservatives? Really? Do tell. How are they? Is it because they were racists and all conservatives are racist?

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but no, that's not why.

It's because Nazism/fascism is a right-wing philosophy. Authoritarianism and blind nationalism are really the defining characteristics of both.

The Progressive era started much earlier? Well the most damage was done with Progs amended the Constitution to allow for a federal income tax and the creation of the Fed. That gave them all the power they needed to destroy Federalism.

You can try to call everything you don't like "progressive", but everyone will just laugh.

The icing on the cake was abandoning the gold standard. Now its all monopoly money as they throw money at every man, woman, and child on the planet to get their way.

AHHAHAHAHA! A gold bug kook! Oh my!

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are free to call me what you like, but I am no Nazi.

But you certainly run cover for Nazis, by pretending Nazis are like liberals, even though all Nazis have always been conservative.

[QUOTEI reject a strong centralized government and have supported the Article V movement to restore Federalism that had been stripped from us during the Progressive era.

The "progressive era" apparently extending back to 1787 or so.

I reject a massive nanny state that Hitler created during his reign

The rest of this is loonytunes stuff, entirely faked stories about how the left is like Hitler. You're revising history openly, and that's very much like the Nazis.

So, let us know when you'll say the white supremacists are no longer welcome in the Republican Party. You can start with the one on this board.

?

No, Hitler did have a massive nanny state.

Here is a book on the matter.

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hitlers-beneficiaries-gotz-aly/1101411440?ean=9780805079265

Essentially, the Nazi regime centralized income that was sent in two directions, the military and nanny state.

For you see, Hitler was terrified of an uprising of the populace that occurred during WW1 because of the lowered standard of living.

To combat this possibility, Hitler made sure that the average German citizen had a higher standard of living than what people had in the US. He succeeded.

It is my opinion that Hitler simply bought off a war weary populace that was steeped in genocide.[/QUOTE]



That wasn't my post....I don't know how it was attributed to me.

 

[Votto]

Nazis are like conservatives? Really? Do tell. How are they? Is it because they were racists and all conservatives are racist?

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but no, that's not why.

It's because Nazism/fascism is a right-wing philosophy. Authoritarianism and blind nationalism are really the defining characteristics of both.

The Progressive era started much earlier? Well the most damage was done with Progs amended the Constitution to allow for a federal income tax and the creation of the Fed. That gave them all the power they needed to destroy Federalism.

You can try to call everything you don't like "progressive", but everyone will just laugh.

The icing on the cake was abandoning the gold standard. Now its all monopoly money as they throw money at every man, woman, and child on the planet to get their way.

AHHAHAHAHA! A gold bug kook! Oh my!

Authoritarianism? Conservatives believe in limited government, not an ever increasingly powerful centralized government that Dims embrace.

The US federal government is now to the point that it passes around 40,000 new regulations and laws every year. That my friend IS an authoritarian government, something conservatives oppose.

 

[Votto]

You are free to call me what you like, but I am no Nazi.

But you certainly run cover for Nazis, by pretending Nazis are like liberals, even though all Nazis have always been conservative.

[QUOTEI reject a strong centralized government and have supported the Article V movement to restore Federalism that had been stripped from us during the Progressive era.

The "progressive era" apparently extending back to 1787 or so.

I reject a massive nanny state that Hitler created during his reign

The rest of this is loonytunes stuff, entirely faked stories about how the left is like Hitler. You're revising history openly, and that's very much like the Nazis.

So, let us know when you'll say the white supremacists are no longer welcome in the Republican Party. You can start with the one on this board.

?

No, Hitler did have a massive nanny state.

Here is a book on the matter.

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hitlers-beneficiaries-gotz-aly/1101411440?ean=9780805079265

Essentially, the Nazi regime centralized income that was sent in two directions, the military and nanny state.

For you see, Hitler was terrified of an uprising of the populace that occurred during WW1 because of the lowered standard of living.

To combat this possibility, Hitler made sure that the average German citizen had a higher standard of living than what people had in the US. He succeeded.

It is my opinion that Hitler simply bought off a war weary populace that was steeped in genocide.

That wasn't my post....I don't know how it was attributed to me.[/QUOTE]

Sorry, I reckon I got my sources crossed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I almost forgot, another common thread that the Nazi types and Dims have in common is their united efforts to defeat Zionism.

If Soros and his minions had their way, Israel would become the new Syria as ISIS would slaughter the entire Jewish population.

David Duke would be cheering in the background.

I hope you have room to include the author of the most used 'history' textbook, Communist Howard Zinn, and America-hating anti-Semite, Noam Chomsky, in that vituperation.

Whoever he is, he is just another empty suit.

Leftism has become the most successful ideology/religion in the last century, bar none.

I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky,

And I'm surprised that you did not realize Hitler had a massive nanny state. They incorporated the term socialist in their name for a reason.

Get a grip.
There isn't anything I don't know.

That wasn't my post....this was:
I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky

 

[mamooth]

Authoritarianism? Conservatives believe in limited government, not an ever increasingly powerful centralized government that Dims embrace.

No, that's what conservatives pretend to believe, but it's the opposite of what they practice. Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government to keep themselves in permanent power, even thought they're a minority, and to enrich themselves by robbing the population. That's authoritarianism. It's not liberals who adore the police-prison state, it's conservatives.

The US federal government is now to the point that it passes around 40,000 new regulations and laws every year. That my friend IS an authoritarian government, something conservatives oppose.

No, that has nothing to do with authoritarianism.

 

[Votto]

Authoritarianism? Conservatives believe in limited government, not an ever increasingly powerful centralized government that Dims embrace.

No, that's what conservatives pretend to believe, but it's the opposite of what they practice. Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government to keep themselves in permanent power, even thought they're a minority, and to enrich themselves by robbing the population. That's authoritarianism. It's not liberals who adore the police-prison state, it's conservatives.

The US federal government is now to the point that it passes around 40,000 new regulations and laws every year. That my friend IS an authoritarian government, something conservatives oppose.

No, that has nothing to do with authoritarianism.

In case you had not noticed, voters put into office Pubes who promised to repeal Obamacare. They even passed a bill that Obama vetoed to repeal Obamacare, but when Trump was there to sign it they refused to repeal it.

Please don't confuse the GOP with conservatives. The GOP are only Dims in sheep's clothing.

So of course, the GOP helps to expand government. In fact, Bush passed one of the largest entitlements in US history via the Drugs for Seniors program.

So passing thousands of laws a year has nothing to do with authoritarianism?

Let me fill you in on a little clue, every law that is passed restricts a freedom. That is why passing laws should be done with great trepidation.

Is the US populace that bad that we need government top pass so many laws every year?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Authoritarianism? Conservatives believe in limited government, not an ever increasingly powerful centralized government that Dims embrace.

No, that's what conservatives pretend to believe, but it's the opposite of what they practice. Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government to keep themselves in permanent power, even thought they're a minority, and to enrich themselves by robbing the population. That's authoritarianism. It's not liberals who adore the police-prison state, it's conservatives.

The US federal government is now to the point that it passes around 40,000 new regulations and laws every year. That my friend IS an authoritarian government, something conservatives oppose.

No, that has nothing to do with authoritarianism.

"...Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government..."


ARE YOU NUTS????

Oops.....sorry, that fact had previously been determined.

 

[mamooth]

"...Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government..."

And you're an especially glaring example of that. Please keep posting and confirming that point.

 

[Votto]

I almost forgot, another common thread that the Nazi types and Dims have in common is their united efforts to defeat Zionism.

If Soros and his minions had their way, Israel would become the new Syria as ISIS would slaughter the entire Jewish population.

David Duke would be cheering in the background.

I hope you have room to include the author of the most used 'history' textbook, Communist Howard Zinn, and America-hating anti-Semite, Noam Chomsky, in that vituperation.

Whoever he is, he is just another empty suit.

Leftism has become the most successful ideology/religion in the last century, bar none.

I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky,

And I'm surprised that you did not realize Hitler had a massive nanny state. They incorporated the term socialist in their name for a reason.

Get a grip.
There isn't anything I don't know.

That wasn't my post....this was:
I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky

Of course, I've heard of them but not studied them individually.

Should I?

 

[mamooth]

Let me fill you in on a little clue, every law that is passed restricts a freedom.

No. For example, laws restricting pollution increase my freedom. Laws making my food safe increase my freedom. And so on.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...Conservatives believe in expanding the heavy-hand of government..."

And you're an especially glaring example of that. Please keep posting and confirming that point.

Sans lying, you'd be mute.

My desire, and that of conservatives, is the very same as the Founders of this once great nation:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


None of which you totalitarians subscribe to.

 

[Votto]

Let me fill you in on a little clue, every law that is passed restricts a freedom.

No. For example, laws restricting pollution increase my freedom. Laws making my food safe increase my freedom. And so on.

Really? So passing gas, which has been labeled a pollutant, should be regulated by the government and you have no issues with how they decide to do that?

Interesting.

Safe food? How about children who are arrested for opening a lemonade stand cuz they don't have a permit? Does that make you safer?

Instead of making sweeping generalizations, why not address the laws, but then, that would be over 40,000 posts, which I'm sure also empowers you, eh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I hope you have room to include the author of the most used 'history' textbook, Communist Howard Zinn, and America-hating anti-Semite, Noam Chomsky, in that vituperation.

Whoever he is, he is just another empty suit.

Leftism has become the most successful ideology/religion in the last century, bar none.

I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky,

And I'm surprised that you did not realize Hitler had a massive nanny state. They incorporated the term socialist in their name for a reason.

Get a grip.
There isn't anything I don't know.

That wasn't my post....this was:
I'm surprised you aren't familiar with Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky

Of course, I've heard of them but not studied them individually.

Should I?

Absolutely!

1. Zinn, communist, wrote the textbook that is the most used in government schools.
You can imagine what it 'teaches' the uninformed.



2. Noah Chomsky is practically a saint in the Church of Liberalism.
1. He has figured out how to make an exceptional fortune while living as a self-described ‘anarchist-socialist’ dissident in a capitalist society he has described as a ‘police state.’

a. He claims to be constantly threatened with censorship, while publishing dozens of books.

b. He denounces the Pentagon as the epitome of evil, while making million from his work for the very same institution. As a tenured MIT professor he actually works for the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT, and same is entirely funded by the Pentagon and a few multinational corporations.

c. His first book, “Syntactic Structures,” was written with grants from the US Army (Signal Corp), the Air Force (Office of Scientific Research, Air Research, and Development Command), and Office of Naval Research.

2. A Professor of Linguistics, Chomsky is vital to the air force and others to improve their “increasingly large investment in so-called ‘command and control’ computer systems” that were being used in Vietnam. Since the computer cannot ‘understand’ English, the commanders’ communications must be translated into a language that the computer can use. http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/back/Wnext26/Chomsky.html

3. A self-described admirer of the Black Panthers, who says that intellectuals must combat ‘all forms of racism,’ and complains that America excluded blacks from large parts of the country, owns a home in a town with a black population of 1.1% Bill Frezza, “A Lion in Winter,” The Tech (MIT student newspaper), February 20, 2004

4. In response to U.S. declarations of a War on Terrorism in 1981 and the redeclaration in 2001, Chomsky has argued that the major sources of international terrorism are the world's major powers, led by the United States. Politics of Noam Chomsky

5. Chomsky praised the North Vietnamese for their efforts in building material prosperity, social justice, and cultural progress. He also went on to discuss and support the political writing of Le Duan. [-Pacific Daily Report of the U.S. government's Foreign Broadcast Information Service, April 16, 1970, pages K2-K3]

6. Chomsky was one of the chief deniers of the Cambodian genocide of the 1970s, which took place in the wake of the Communist victory and American withdrawal from Indochina. He directed vitriolic attacks towards the reporters and witnesses who testified to the human catastrophe that was taking place there. Initially, Chomsky tried to minimize the deaths (a “few thousand”) and compared those killed by Pol Pot and his followers to the collaborators who had been executed by resistance movements in Europe at the end of World War II. By 1980, however, it was no longer possible to deny that some 2 million of Cambodia's 7.8 million people had perished at the hands of the Communists. But Professor Chomsky continued to deny the genocide, proposing that the underlying problem may have been a failure of the rice crop. As late as 1988, Chomsky returned to the subject and insisted that whatever had happened in Cambodia, the U.S. was to blame.

a. This conclusion is the principal theme of what may be loosely termed Chomsky's intellectual oeuvre: Whatever evil exists in the world, the United States is to blame. His intellectual obsession is America and its “grand strategy of world domination.” In 1967 Professor Chomsky wrote that America “needed a kind of denazification.” The Third Reich has provided him with his central metaphor for his own country ever since.

b. The Soviet dictatorship was not only "morally equivalent" to democratic America, in Chomsky’s view, but actually better because it was less powerful. The chief sin of Stalinism in his eyes was not the murder of millions, but the fact that he had given socialism a bad name. Noam Chomsky - Discover the Networks



And, a virulent Jewish anti-Semite.
And, I'd be happy to provide a list of his slanders about Jews and Israel as well.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

A Fascist is just a thinking Conservative.

Conservatives love Capitalism, and Jews, while Capitalism, and Jews are their enemies.

Jewish Capitalist Hollywood, and media are 2 of the most hated enemies of the common Conservative.

But, they don't seem to connect the dots.

A fascist wants a strong centralized government to redistribute wealth and any other social justice policy they wish to impose on society.

I'm not a fascist.

Many Conservatives in the U.S, want more military spending, apparently it's not enough that the U.S spends close to 48% of the World's military budget.

According to the Constitution, defending the borders is one of the few jobs given to the Federal government.

However, that is a far stretch to military conquest going on around the world. Most I think are just duped.

I suppose you've never heard of the Founding Fathers healthcare act, The 1798 “Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen

Besides, only idiots dictate the future by what's written long ago.

But, British blooded morons of the U.S South are really that stupid.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

LOL, Soros is a Jew, though.

Soros turned Jews over to the Nazi's in WW2 for money. He has no love of Jews

Jews don't worship a prophet, they instead worship many profits.

So you hate Jews? Are you suggesting that all Jews are greedy?

I certainly don't care for Jews, and a lot of Jews are definitely greedy, even if some are not.

So do you sympathize with Hitler and the white nationalists and the Dim objective of confiscating their wealth so they can redistribute it?

I don't sympathize with Hitler.

I'd kick Jews out of this country, if I had my way.

The Jews will be at the forefront of corrupting any society with degeneracy, and Liberalism.