What America thinks of the impeachment

[froggy]

We Asked 81 Americans About Impeachment. Here’s What They Had to Say.
And I think that blumberg is a bigger joke than all

 

[georgephillip]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

 

[froggy]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

They wanted Witnesses in the house too but did they get them

 

[DGS49]

It is pointless to poll the general public about legal matters; they are, collectively speaking, idiots.

The time for witnesses is during the impeachment inquiry. If the Democrats want witnesses or new evidence, there is a very easy way to have them. Withdraw the Articles and start over.

 

[Rambunctious]

If the dems were convincing anyone or doing damage to the president with this charade....the media would be bombarding us with the evidence....but they are not....

 

[two_iron]

I'm all for witnesses.... let's start with Pedo Joe and his crackhead sprog... 2 hours later the marxist Dims would cease to exist in this country.

 

[WillowTree]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

Why didn’t the House Democrats call witnesses?

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

It is pointless to poll the general public about legal matters; they are, collectively speaking, idiots

Colonel....you nailed it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

First 3 witnesses:

Hunter Biden
Joe Biden
Adam Schiff

 

[georgephillip]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

They wanted Witnesses in the house too but did they get them

They wanted Witnesses in the house too but did they get them

How did that work out?

"President Trump appeared to admit Wednesday that he is comfortable with how his impeachment trial is playing out in the Senate—because the White House is withholding evidence about his dealings with Ukraine."

Trump Admits to Withholding Evidence From Impeachment Inquiry

 

[georgephillip]

he time for witnesses is during the impeachment inquiry. If the Democrats want witnesses or new evidence, there is a very easy way to have them. Withdraw the Articles and start over.

How many Senate impeachment trials have been conducted without witnesses?

 

[georgephillip]

If the dems were convincing anyone or doing damage to the president with this charade....the media would be bombarding us with the evidence....but they are not....

Depends on which media you're listening to:

Day in Impeachment: Democrats Focus on Abuse of Power

"The president’s prosecutor began by re-evaluating the now familiar transcript of Mr. Trump’s July 25 phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, urging senators to hear it with fresh ears after two days of arguments by the House. But his challenge to senators was a straightforward one: Do you really believe that this president, the one on this call, has put the nation’s interests before his own and will do so in the future?

"'You know you can’t trust this president to do what is right for this country,' he said. 'You can trust he will do what’s right for Donald Trump.'"

 

[georgephillip]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

Why didn’t the House Democrats call witnesses?

Why didn’t the House Democrats call witnesses?

They did.

House Democrats' strategy was nothing short of genius (Opinion) - CNN

Why did Trump stonewall all subpoenas for witnesses and documents? Is he corrupt?

 

[WillowTree]

Let them speak: Most Americans want witnesses in Trump impeachment trial - Reuters/Ipsos poll

"A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday...."

"About 72% agreed that the trial 'should allow witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the impeachment charges to testify,' including 84% of Democrats and 69% of Republicans. And 70% of the public, including 80% of Democrats and 73% of Republicans, said senators should 'act as impartial jurors” during the trial.'"

Maybe Trump will testify and clear everything up?

Why didn’t the House Democrats call witnesses?

Why didn’t the House Democrats call witnesses?

They did.

House Democrats' strategy was nothing short of genius (Opinion) - CNN

Why did Trump stonewall all subpoenas for witnesses and documents? Is he corrupt?

Those weren’t witnesses. The were opinionated leftists with hearsay tales. They were asked to give proof of a crime and not one could even name a crime. .

 

[Rambunctious]

If the dems were convincing anyone or doing damage to the president with this charade....the media would be bombarding us with the evidence....but they are not....

Depends on which media you're listening to:

Day in Impeachment: Democrats Focus on Abuse of Power

"The president’s prosecutor began by re-evaluating the now familiar transcript of Mr. Trump’s July 25 phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, urging senators to hear it with fresh ears after two days of arguments by the House. But his challenge to senators was a straightforward one: Do you really believe that this president, the one on this call, has put the nation’s interests before his own and will do so in the future?

"'You know you can’t trust this president to do what is right for this country,' he said. 'You can trust he will do what’s right for Donald Trump.'"

No one is buying it....the media has no power left....they pissed it away...

 

[Redfish]

We Asked 81 Americans About Impeachment. Here’s What They Had to Say.
And I think that blumberg is a bigger joke than all

81? out of 330,000,000? really?

 

[Redfish]

he time for witnesses is during the impeachment inquiry. If the Democrats want witnesses or new evidence, there is a very easy way to have them. Withdraw the Articles and start over.

How many Senate impeachment trials have been conducted without witnesses?

How many times has the house conducted an impeachment without allowing witnesses from the person being impeached?

the double standard from the dems on this is laughable

 

[froggy]

We Asked 81 Americans About Impeachment. Here’s What They Had to Say.
And I think that blumberg is a bigger joke than all

81? out of 330,000,000? really?

So you're assuming 330,000,000 have been asked. You know what happens when you assume?

 

[georgephillip]

Those weren’t witnesses. The were opinionated leftists with hearsay tales. They were asked to give proof of a crime and not one could even name a crime. .

Did Trump tell you that?

House Democrats' strategy was nothing short of genius (Opinion) - CNN

"Finally, House Democrats may have trolled the President. It seems that they knew full well that he would never have been able to resist attacking witnesses, and picked the most sympathetic ones to tell the story.

"The first several witnesses to testify were: Taylor, a 72-year-old Vietnam Veteran; Kent, a diplomat with 27 years of experience; Yovanovitch, a naturalized American woman with 33 years of diplomatic experience; Williams, a member of the vice president's staff; and Vindman, an Army lieutenant colonel still carrying shrapnel from an Iraqi roadside bomb.

"Of course, the President delivered.

"He routinely questioned the credibility of the witnesses and, during Yovanovitch's testimony, unleashed a Twitter attack that some called witness intimidation."

He lied about that too.

 

[WillowTree]

Those weren’t witnesses. The were opinionated leftists with hearsay tales. They were asked to give proof of a crime and not one could even name a crime. .

Did Trump tell you that?

House Democrats' strategy was nothing short of genius (Opinion) - CNN

"Finally, House Democrats may have trolled the President. It seems that they knew full well that he would never have been able to resist attacking witnesses, and picked the most sympathetic ones to tell the story.

"The first several witnesses to testify were: Taylor, a 72-year-old Vietnam Veteran; Kent, a diplomat with 27 years of experience; Yovanovitch, a naturalized American woman with 33 years of diplomatic experience; Williams, a member of the vice president's staff; and Vindman, an Army lieutenant colonel still carrying shrapnel from an Iraqi roadside bomb.

"Of course, the President delivered.

"He routinely questioned the credibility of the witnesses and, during Yovanovitch's testimony, unleashed a Twitter attack that some called witness intimidation."

He lied about that too.

CNN? Ya gotta be kidding