forkintheroad7
Platinum Member
- Apr 22, 2024
- 5,251
- 2,834
- 928
- Thread starter
- #41
No, buttons are quite different from bulletsBullets. You know what I meant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, buttons are quite different from bulletsBullets. You know what I meant.
You just say it is ridiculous because you're ticked at me... how intellectually honest of youTyler Robinson will be tried in a court of law and I strongly believe he will be found guilty and convicted. If he has a decent judge/jury his sentence will be appropriate for his crime.
My post was intended to expose the utter ridiculousness that Israel is somehow behind Charlie Kirk's murder.
If not, you will surely make one up. The doctor who examined Kirk remarked that the position of the bullet was impossible. Stopped by a bone it should have shattered. That was the instant medical finding. It was impossible, but it was.You don't know that w/ certainty.
No one seems to know much at all. Many things are being kept from us, like: If the bullet caused no exit wound, why are we being told he was shot with a 306 weapon which would have definitely left an exit wound... ? And there are other problems w/ the official narrative.
You'd make a lousy lawyer. The facts are FAR from all in on this story. Do you really expect corrupt people or likely corrupt ones to tell the truth? If there was a connection, the truth will not be discovered easily......It was a heartfelt post that it is totally deranged and absurd to think Israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.
No one is ticked at you. The very idea that Israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirk’s death is ridiculous and absurd.You just say it is ridiculous because you're ticked at me... how intellectually honest of you
ditto you: you'd make a lousy attorney, deciding cases before all the facts and evidence are even in...No one is ticked at you. The very idea that Israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirk’s death is ridiculous and absurd.
I was an excellent attorney. Someone who is being framed will normally be screaming "I wuz FRAMED". Not looking at nonsense like DA JOOS DID IT. Blaming Israel is automatically laughable. It's a knee jerk reaction by those who blame Jews for moldy bread and soured milk.ditto you: you'd make a lousy attorney, deciding cases before all the facts and evidence are even in...
you're apparently a bad attorney regardless of having been one because you have not mentioned ONE item of what is in that one video where the guy talks about the suspicious activity of someone near Kirk that day... not one mention at all. But you just know there is nothing to it...I was an excellent attorney. Someone who is being framed will normally be screaming "I wuz FRAMED". Not looking at nonsense like DA JOOS DID IT. Blaming Israel is automatically laughable. It's a knee jerk reaction by those who blame Jews for moldy bread and soured milk.
You also don't know who is ticked at me or why. If I recall, I wasn't referring to the Israel allegations when Foxfire argued w/ my points.. But it doesn't really matter what the issue was. You and others are quick to convict people who may not have acted alone... yeh, rush him through the "justice system".. execute him and voila... no one will ever question the narrative anymore... just like no one questions the Marilyn Monroe thing anymore.. or if they do, it's now a moot issue.No one is ticked at you. The very idea that Israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirk’s death is ridiculous and absurd.
Because the suspicious activity is all in your head.you're apparently a bad attorney regardless of having been one because you have not mentioned ONE item of what is in that one video where the guy talks about the suspicious activity of someone near Kirk that day... not one mention at all. But you just know there is nothing to it...
Please
Because the suspicious activity is all in your head.
Well, that's because he didn't!I posted the following in Religion but it got moved here. I started out saying Death penalty for Robinson but have totally changed my mind.
I didn't watch the entire video in the thread Video discussing Israel's role in the Kirk killing but what I watched was horrifying. The guy speaking (older one) mentions parts of the video of the Kirk shooting that I have never seen, about a man dressed in brown who doesn't seem shocked by the shooting as all other bystanders are, who got into the (van?) with Kirk, who was likely already deceased.. had time to remove his shirt...
And I didn't know Kirk had Israeli security...
Things are beginning to look very strange-- and so, I take back my comments on Tyler Robinson should get the death penalty-- Obviously, what I meant was IF he is guilty, but after watching that video, I doubt I will EVER believe he is guilty (or alone guilty).
So, while I am in favor of the death penalty in many murder cases, I say No death penalty for Robinson -- EVER because my trust of the system has (not for the first time) been shattered..
We may never know the entire truth
It's another Owald thing, apparently... Many people don't believe Oswald shot Kennedy. Does any of us even know what to believe of what "they" tell us?
When are you going to realize that electrocution as a death penalty went away a long time ago?Fire up old sparky.....end of story
He was shot with a deer hunting round designed not to cause exit wounds. The bullet was still in his body and removed by the surgeon who commented about how the round was deflected and deformed by the impact.You don't know that w/ certainty.
No one seems to know much at all. Many things are being kept from us, like: If the bullet caused no exit wound, why are we being told he was shot with a 306 weapon which would have definitely left an exit wound... ? And there are other problems w/ the official narrative.
I've watched ballistics experts on this and they say NO way would a 306 stay in the neck of anyone or even many things.. I've seen it demonstrated by people shooting through different substances. Said substances explode into thousands of pieces..He was shot with a deer hunting round designed not to cause exit wounds. The bullet was still in his body and removed by the surgeon who commented about how the round was deflected and deformed by the impact.
who didn't do what?Well, that's because he didn't!
Yes I would make a lousy lawyer. I've only had a few legal courses and am not ready for the bar exam. But I can read. I can listen. I can check facts instead of believing some cockamamie propaganda fueled conspiracy theory I found on the internet.You'd make a lousy lawyer. The facts are FAR from all in on this story. Do you really expect corrupt people or likely corrupt ones to tell the truth? If there was a connection, the truth will not be discovered easily......
Why? What did you do to tick me off? That's news to me. I say its ridiculous because the facts totally contradict the theory. Is that so difficult for you to understand?You just say it is ridiculous because you're ticked at me... how intellectually honest of you
Did the so-called ballistic experts test the load in the cartridge that propelled the round to see if it was standard? No, because they cannot. Have you seen images of the bullet? Google is your friend.I've watched ballistics experts on this and they say NO way would a 306 stay in the neck of anyone or even many things.. I've seen it demonstrated by people shooting through different substances. Said substances explode into thousands of pieces..
His security was his own people, including his personal friends. Where is your link to his having employed an Israeli security company? Are you going to deflect or provide a link?who didn't do what?