Vote Your Values

[PoliticalChic]

1.The collateral damage related to banning religion from the public arena is that large segments of the population see no problem with murder. There is a certain necessity there, as the neo-Marxism that has insinuated its way into our culture and rules our major political party, requires a copacetic view of genocide and mass slaughter, else the Democrat infatuation with Soviet Communism would have been dead on arrival.

2. It appears that, once having accepted death due to murder, at least in its historical setting, the concept easily bled over into an acceptance of murder in all sorts of issues. As in the slaughter of the innocent and defenseless unborn. And once accepted that far, heck…..what’s another few hours….or months…..to the slaughter of the already-born: infanticide.

And it is now a Democrat principle, one you support with your vote.





3. Democrat Virginia Governor, and medical doctor, Northam, adhered to and explained that Democrat principle, here: "If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother," Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.” Fake News: Liberal Rag Says Trump Lied About VA Governor's Support For After Birth Abortion. Uh, There's Tape.

Do you need the definition of 'infanticide'?




4. “Washington Post Lies About The Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide The Washington Post “fact checks” … blatantly misleads readers about the Democratic Party’s platform on abortion. The Post article says: “The policies Democrats support generally limit abortions to the first 20 to 24 weeks of gestation. Most abortions are performed at eight weeks or earlier. Experts have told The Washington Post that abortions up to the moment of birth, what could be described as infanticide, are not happening in the United States.”

5. Seriously? Have the so-called fact-checkers at The Washington Post not read the Democratic Party platform? Were they on vacation when exactly zero Democratic senators voted to protect pain-capable children? Have they not been paying attention to the laws in states like Illinois, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Virginia? The Democratic governor of Virginia — a man considered a moderate in his party — proved on live radio that the Post’s description is inaccurate.

6. A born, living human being—with no human rights. That is the position of the Democratic Party. The Democratic platform calls for worldwide, unlimited, taxpayer-funded elective abortion on demand. Not only that, but the Democratic establishment also promises a litmus test for federal judges who will rule without fail for elective abortion on demand, no matter what the law or facts provide. The Democratic establishment is a hotbed of abortion extremism the likes of which we have never before seen on a national scale.” Washington Post Lies About Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide



And they want your vote to validate that.

 

[bluzman61]

1.The collateral damage related to banning religion from the public arena is that large segments of the population see no problem with murder. There is a certain necessity there, as the neo-Marxism that has insinuated its way into our culture and rules our major political party, requires a copacetic view of genocide and mass slaughter, else the Democrat infatuation with Soviet Communism would have been dead on arrival.

2. It appears that, once having accepted death due to murder, at least in its historical setting, the concept easily bled over into an acceptance of murder in all sorts of issues. As in the slaughter of the innocent and defenseless unborn. And once accepted that far, heck…..what’s another few hours….or months…..to the slaughter of the already-born: infanticide.

And it is now a Democrat principle, one you support with your vote.





3. Democrat Virginia Governor, and medical doctor, Northam, adhered to and explained that Democrat principle, here: "If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother," Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.” Fake News: Liberal Rag Says Trump Lied About VA Governor's Support For After Birth Abortion. Uh, There's Tape.

Do you need the definition of 'infanticide'?




4. “Washington Post Lies About The Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide The Washington Post “fact checks” … blatantly misleads readers about the Democratic Party’s platform on abortion. The Post article says: “The policies Democrats support generally limit abortions to the first 20 to 24 weeks of gestation. Most abortions are performed at eight weeks or earlier. Experts have told The Washington Post that abortions up to the moment of birth, what could be described as infanticide, are not happening in the United States.”

5. Seriously? Have the so-called fact-checkers at The Washington Post not read the Democratic Party platform? Were they on vacation when exactly zero Democratic senators voted to protect pain-capable children? Have they not been paying attention to the laws in states like Illinois, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Virginia? The Democratic governor of Virginia — a man considered a moderate in his party — proved on live radio that the Post’s description is inaccurate.

6. A born, living human being—with no human rights. That is the position of the Democratic Party. The Democratic platform calls for worldwide, unlimited, taxpayer-funded elective abortion on demand. Not only that, but the Democratic establishment also promises a litmus test for federal judges who will rule without fail for elective abortion on demand, no matter what the law or facts provide. The Democratic establishment is a hotbed of abortion extremism the likes of which we have never before seen on a national scale.” Washington Post Lies About Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide



And they want your vote to validate that.

Another fantastic post, PC. Thank you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.The collateral damage related to banning religion from the public arena is that large segments of the population see no problem with murder. There is a certain necessity there, as the neo-Marxism that has insinuated its way into our culture and rules our major political party, requires a copacetic view of genocide and mass slaughter, else the Democrat infatuation with Soviet Communism would have been dead on arrival.

2. It appears that, once having accepted death due to murder, at least in its historical setting, the concept easily bled over into an acceptance of murder in all sorts of issues. As in the slaughter of the innocent and defenseless unborn. And once accepted that far, heck…..what’s another few hours….or months…..to the slaughter of the already-born: infanticide.

And it is now a Democrat principle, one you support with your vote.





3. Democrat Virginia Governor, and medical doctor, Northam, adhered to and explained that Democrat principle, here: "If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother," Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.” Fake News: Liberal Rag Says Trump Lied About VA Governor's Support For After Birth Abortion. Uh, There's Tape.

Do you need the definition of 'infanticide'?




4. “Washington Post Lies About The Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide The Washington Post “fact checks” … blatantly misleads readers about the Democratic Party’s platform on abortion. The Post article says: “The policies Democrats support generally limit abortions to the first 20 to 24 weeks of gestation. Most abortions are performed at eight weeks or earlier. Experts have told The Washington Post that abortions up to the moment of birth, what could be described as infanticide, are not happening in the United States.”

5. Seriously? Have the so-called fact-checkers at The Washington Post not read the Democratic Party platform? Were they on vacation when exactly zero Democratic senators voted to protect pain-capable children? Have they not been paying attention to the laws in states like Illinois, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Virginia? The Democratic governor of Virginia — a man considered a moderate in his party — proved on live radio that the Post’s description is inaccurate.

6. A born, living human being—with no human rights. That is the position of the Democratic Party. The Democratic platform calls for worldwide, unlimited, taxpayer-funded elective abortion on demand. Not only that, but the Democratic establishment also promises a litmus test for federal judges who will rule without fail for elective abortion on demand, no matter what the law or facts provide. The Democratic establishment is a hotbed of abortion extremism the likes of which we have never before seen on a national scale.” Washington Post Lies About Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide



And they want your vote to validate that.

Another fantastic post, PC. Thank you.

Yer da best, Bluzie

 

[initforme]

That's why I have to vote 3rd party. It's going to become more and more popular. Thankfully.

 

[kyzr]

When a BLM member shot a Patriot Prayer and Blue Lives Matter supporter, BLM speakers called the dead patriot a "nazi" and said "taking out the trash" was a good thing.

Moment pro-cop man was killed in clashes between Trump supporters & protesters

SHOCKING footage shows the moment a pro-cop man was shot dead during clashes between Trump supporters and BLM protesters in Portland. The leader of far-right group Patriot Prayer has confirmed the …

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's why I have to vote 3rd party. It's going to become more and more popular. Thankfully.

Here's why normal folks don't:


"These reckless media smears were completely detached from the reality of Trump’s accomplishments in his first seven months. His tax and deregulation policies had created a record-setting economy. Unemployment rates for minorities had reached historic lows. He had strengthened the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and even shattered the leftist claims of a Trump-Russia collusion when he punished Putin’s murderous ally Bashar al-Assad with a devastating Tomahawk missile strike. Trump was also well on his way to destroying the Islamic caliphate in eight months—something Barack Obama had failed to accomplish with five years of feeble military efforts. The bizarre and baseless media attacks on the president were intended to halt Trump’s progress and shake the loyalty of his 63 million political sup- porters. Instead, Trump continued to rack up policy victories, while the media attacks actually intensified his public support."
Horowitz, "Blitz," Ch.3

 

[PoliticalChic]

When a BLM member shot a Patriot Prayer and Blue Lives Matter supporter, BLM speakers called the dead patriot a "nazi" and said "taking out the trash" was a good thing.

Moment pro-cop man was killed in clashes between Trump supporters & protesters

SHOCKING footage shows the moment a pro-cop man was shot dead during clashes between Trump supporters and BLM protesters in Portland. The leader of far-right group Patriot Prayer has confirmed the …

www.thesun.co.uk

I believe you are pointing out the affinity the Left/Democrats have with death....

...totally in line with both the abortionists, and the Islamofascists.

...if so, I whole-heartedly agree.

 

[konradv]

Vote your values? That's what these people plan on doing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Vote your values? That's what these people plan on doing.

More twists and turns in that post than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!

Quite a stretch you're making, Konny, in an attempt to hide your acceptance of infanticide.

You should simply say you agree with this:
Leading Muslim clerics often refer to the love of death. Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom.” http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/stalinsky200405240846.asp

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Recent and current events prove that this Democrat Party has been taken over by a faction conforming to this analysis: the present Democrat Party is closer to Lee Harvey Oswald than to John F. Kennedy.
The party always had a soft spot for the Soviets, but now have embraced that entity totally.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every American worthy of our heritage is pro-life.
The abortion/infanticide view is an iteration of this: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




8. In this country we calculate the slaughter as:
TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995
Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]
http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

But this may be cheating the Left of the full benefits or value of their policies.
Their predecessors, the Soviet Bolsheviks were wayyyyy ahead: “the Soviets legalized abortion on demand in 1920…”
Legacies of 1917 in Contemporary Russian Public Health: Addiction, HIV, and Abortion

“In 1920, Russian Soviet Republic became the first country in the world to allow abortion in all circumstances,…” Abortion in Russia - Wikipedia

An estimated 1 million abortions in the early years of Soviet Russia Historical abortion statistics, Russia




One more way the Democrats/Liberals align with Soviet Communism.

 

[initforme]

Normal people vote their values. Grabbing women in appropriately and shenanigans with pornstars aren't my values.

 

[konradv]

Vote your values? That's what these people plan on doing.

More twists and turns in that post than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!

Quite a stretch you're making, Konny, in an attempt to hide your acceptance of infanticide.

You should simply say you agree with this:
Leading Muslim clerics often refer to the love of death. Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom.” http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/stalinsky200405240846.asp

Infanticide? Are you deranged? You obviously didn't listen to any of the clips. Nice try at deflection, but anyone with half a brain has your number, i.e. truth and honesty is an obstacle, rather than a goal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Normal people vote their values. Grabbing women in appropriately and shenanigans with pornstars aren't my values.

How about infanticide?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Vote your values? That's what these people plan on doing.

More twists and turns in that post than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!

Quite a stretch you're making, Konny, in an attempt to hide your acceptance of infanticide.

You should simply say you agree with this:
Leading Muslim clerics often refer to the love of death. Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom.” http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/stalinsky200405240846.asp

Infanticide? Are you deranged? You obviously didn't listen to any of the clips. Nice try at deflection, but anyone with half a brain has your number, i.e. truth and honesty is an obstacle, rather than a goal.

A whole lot of jukin' and jivin' in that post, Konny.

Democrats are for infanticide.

Do you vote Democrat?

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. Due to the binary nature of our political system, there are only two parties that have a chance to win national election. The choice is always to pick the one closest to the constellation of one’s political beliefs and wishes. When it comes to the value of human life, Democrat voters are in a pickle.



“The Democratic Party is as radical as we have ever seen on the issue of abortion, but the policies that average Democrats support generally do holistically protect life and limit abortions. Polling and social research consistently show that approximately one-third of registered Democrats oppose killing the most vulnerable among us and consider themselves to be pro-life. That’s more than 20 million Democrats!

The outlook of the average Democratic voter remains generally pro-life, but the Democratic Party bosses and many politicians (with some refreshing exceptions) are pro-abortion through and through. We cannot change this by avoiding hard conversations. The only way to overcome the injustice of abortion is by continuing to speak up and speak out in public life.”
Washington Post Lies About Democratic Party’s Support For Infanticide




If you vote Democrat, you empower the most savage, atavistic, anti-life regime this nation has ever seen.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. The conundrum for the pro-life Democrat voter is where does one draw the line? It is so very tempting to ignore the question of whether or not the unborn, or the newly-born are living human beings.

Both are.

“The formation, maturation and meeting of a male and female sex cell are all preliminary to their actual union into a combined cell, or zygote, which definitely marks the beginning of a new individual. The penetration of the ovum by the spermatozoon, and the coming together and pooling of their respective nuclei, constitutes the process of fertilization.”
Ronan O’Rahilly and Fabiola Miller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.


fetus (n.)
late 14c., "the young while in the womb or egg" (tending to mean vaguely the embryo in the later stage of development), from Latin fetus (often, incorrectly, foetus) "the bearing or hatching of young, a bringing forth, pregnancy, childbearing, offspring,"
fetus | Origin and meaning of fetus by Online Etymology Dictionary



"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being...[this] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence...." - Dr Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Genetics at the University of Descartes, Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down's Syndrome, and Nobel Prize Winner

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. The Left is adept at the sort of word games that will help assuage one’s conscience about the slaughter of the innocent, such as

The misunderstanding is that the choice was before the little human was created. After that, it isn’t your body. So says science:

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

1. No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/mothers_body/



Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?

 

[konradv]

Vote your values? That's what these people plan on doing.

More twists and turns in that post than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!

Quite a stretch you're making, Konny, in an attempt to hide your acceptance of infanticide.

You should simply say you agree with this:
Leading Muslim clerics often refer to the love of death. Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom.” http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/stalinsky200405240846.asp

Infanticide? Are you deranged? You obviously didn't listen to any of the clips. Nice try at deflection, but anyone with half a brain has your number, i.e. truth and honesty is an obstacle, rather than a goal.

A whole lot of jukin' and jivin' in that post, Konny. Democrats are for infanticide. Do you vote Democrat?

Yes I do and this year so will she.

 

[BigDave]

As Richard Nixon said in 1968 "Vote Like Your Whole World Depended On It"

 

[konradv]

As Richard Nixon said in 1968 "Vote Like Your Whole World Depended On It"

Well, we know how that turned out. Too bad today's Republican Members of Congress don't have the same integrity.