You make up some nonsense about std's, and refuse to acknowledge that Assange has not been charged with any crime, and I'm fishing the whopper waters?
You're the one who said I was the second grader,
requerda usted? (IOW, "Don't you remember?") Since good human health and related issues of a caring nature for other people is the light under my fire, I'm not surprised it is the ball and chain of your little dungeon in which celebrities believing their behaviors are law over boring national ones, I thought I'd delve into the meat behind the Swedish Law and why observing it is so salient to this case of Mr. Assange's detention in the UK until the court makes its decision. You can better believe that Europe, having seen plagues, invasions, train bombings by religious takeover fanatics, and mores explosions of one type or another are honing in on why Swedes, with their gentle society of egalitarianism and nonjudgmental ways are requiring men to use condoms when engaging in exploiting the world's oldest profession for youthful pleasure and stimulation.
There are parameters to worry-free sex, and all of them have to do with preserving human health for the most people. Otherwise, the future of the kind of people who live in and run Sweden will be limited to prodigy protected by men placing their daughters into chastity belts until they marry at a very early age to keep venereal disease out of royal lines to keep the rates of mental illness and deformities away from their families who need all of their faculties to rule other people.
Since they wish to minimize this risk in Sweden, they just passed a law protecting vulnerable women exploited by infected foreigners engaging in one-night stands who feel freedom means taking women they pay by brutal force rather than protecting Sweden's future posterity by healthful practice in this situational mode of living.
From what I've seen, men around these parts are now using atheism as their excuse for dissing religious people whose practice is monogamy for religions grounded in just plain good sense about the deformities, blindness, illnesses, and death that result as the consequence of unprotected barbarism in sexually deviant practices.
That will bring upon them and their prodigy (willing or not) deformities, madness, and other diseases civilized people would not want foisted on their own young.
So freedom has its consequences, whether we like it or not. The freedom to live in a licentious way is the demanded choice of atheists who just want to get laid every night with a different lady who is brainwashed into thinking this is the ticket to social acceptance by men. If 10% of the population has
Trichomoniasis vaginalis, 365 lays with different women who agree to have unprotected sex with one of these studs, he is 100% likely (rounding off the .0001% chance he will not contract the invasive specie aka Trich), and let's say he contracts it on December 31 with another year of 365 lays ahead of him, he will be spreading the disease around to another 365 women. If all of them are paid prostitutes with an average of 20 services per week, it doesn't take much math to conclude that with everyone doing it, there will not be enough money leftover to raise families, there will be a propensity to alter books to reduce taxes from a more-and-more needful government determined to protect its people.
The health costs will be the only dominant influence in such a country.
So for pragmatic purposes, governments tolerating everybody's mores and beliefs that sex should be exploited pleasurably on an animal basis, the only prodigy of that society will have a mathematical propensity of 100% to be born with the disease organism that tells other disease organisms "come hither, you're welcome inside here."
A few more diseases thrown into the broth means a high percentile of live births will be experienced by blind infants and mothers too sick to care for them. It goes on and on exponentially from there.
Somebody has to set their foot down and say "enough." Primitive human beings didn't have microscopes, but they knew screwing around in certain circles brought illnesses home, and they developed smarter mechanisms to cope with this problem. That's how morality evolved.
With improved medicine, a huge sector of human beings have developed a strategy to escape the moral code with the backup of modern medicine.
When a disease popped up in a significant population in 1979, half its victims initially died within 3 years after long drawn out battles with formerly diseases that had a small death rate since they were so rare. Aids brought several cancers into a virulence that frightened medical researchers doing autopsies on the disease-riddled people. It was HIV. Now, they can even extend the life using medicines developed in all sorts of ways ignored by Peta who have become an organization revitalized by getting rid of morally religious people on account of their omnivorous eating habits, but ignore their immoral killing of little animals bred to warehouse cures for the venereal diseases their brother atheists demand to stay well.
All this costs a lot more money than abstinence, and those who engage in illicit sexual practices want somebody else to pay for their pleasure, because they actually cannot afford it on a mundane work-a-day salary or even a generous inheritance, which their allies in takeover governments also prey on in order to raise money for free medical services including abortions and freebie sex toys as part of their psychological well-being. Moral people are footing the bill for people who don't work to have every convenience once only had by the super-rich, and politicians aren't telling the truth as to why they must demand other people to foot the bill for what was once called heathen behaviors, but threats from populous states demand euphemistic names to encourage their intrusion into people's paychecks for everything on earth that they have through obnoxious taxes.
That quite effectively eliminates "the American dream," "every man his own castle," private enterprise, the passage of a family business from one family to its next generation, and other very American staple practices for 250 years, now being nixed by the atheists with hellfire and damnation against any semblance of Christianity or its defense. The hatred is profuse, far-reaching, adapted by schools as teaching mechanisms for eliminating family ties that remind them of what my generation thought was the right and moral thing to do.
"Can a man freely spread egregious diseases onto working women for his payment?" That's what this Assange hearing is all about. It's about the focus of the modern world with its new super drugs and medicine now credited with saving a specie that didn't need saving when it merely practiced limiting sexual pleasure to the parameters of a one-man, one-woman union also once known as holy matrimony.
The outcome of the Assange hearing has a lot more to do with whether a man can tear off a woman's panties and have his way with her right there on the spot, exposing her to his sexual exploits possibly over years where he has contracted antigens to many diseases, or was it just an untimely fluke where a man got carried away with only two beautiful women he thought he could screw without wearing a condom?
I really don't know where this will go, Mr. Kennedy. I've tried not to incorporate my old-fashioned girl mores and simply look at the issue from a health standpoint. Governments looking to save everybody in the country from a life of harm need to look on invasive diseases if they are planning their own ruin ahead of time. Just read my above posts! Millions of lives are damaged every year by a pandemic of sexual behaviors solicited by the atheists who are now arming themselves against "backward" Christian people, and they're using sundry tolerant political entities to have their way with freebie government pie that OTHER people pay for. They're too busy screwing around to even have a job, so they solicit physicians who will sign a paper saying that they are ill and need public assistance.
All in the name of "free love."
Do you see why I am pursuing what is to me an unwise turn of events in humanity's behaviors?
Yet you accused me of being a second-grader because I stand by my beliefs backed by scientific study into the microcosms of human pathologies, you just didn't realize it because I try to keep my speech colloquial when I can so I can be part of human social groups I like, my church being one of them, and my hobby sisters being another.
Now, come, be a good sport. You do chancroid as I requested above. That will leave me time to do the heavy hitting on the big boy diseases like HIV and still do my disciplined quota of quilt tops for the abuse shelter children who arrive damaged by their parent's broken relationships when one of them prefers drugs or group sex to a boring marriage-and-children scenario all his friends are rejecting in order to live a different lifestyle that will free them from having to wipe snotty noses, poopy butts, listening to whining about other children, and the other crazy-makers of young life that all children go through and have no one but parents to help them out.
Alternative lifestyles aren't kind to already-existing children before or after they are born.
Just sayin'.
