Video: Israel is just a tool of the USA and is not its master - The New Atlas 3.11.26

[Invisibleflash]

Worthwhile video making the case that Israel is just one of America's tools for world domination and the USA is not under the thumb of the Jews as is popularly thought. He makes a very good case for his presentation.

Video Description:

The US can continue existing as a rapacious empire with or without Israel - it surely did fine for almost 2 centuries before Israel was created out of thin air by the Anglo-Americans - but the crimes of Israel would be impossible without US empire behind it. Israel is not blameless. Blame it for its role in facilitating Western empire up to and including abetting genocide and wars of aggression. But do not blame it for "corrupting" something that was never wholesome to begin with.

 

[BackAgain]

The New Atlas. A fresh new hell.

 

[OldFlame]

The New Atlas (Brian Berletic) is not a reliable source for factual news or rigorous analysis. It mixes accurate facts with misleading framing, selective sourcing, conspiracy-prone narratives, and advocacy that repeatedly departs from mainstream, evidence-based journalism.

How credibility breaks down

• Sourcing and verification
  • Frequently relies on fringe outlets, anonymous social-media posts, selective excerpts of official documents, or single-source claims without corroboration.
  • Limited use of primary-source documents, peer-reviewed studies, or independent verification. When primary sources appear, they are often quoted out of context.
• Editorial stance and objectivity
  • Presents strongly polemical, anti-establishment narratives (geopolitical conspiracies, deep-state claims, broad institutional malign intent) rather than balanced analysis.
  • Uses loaded language and certainty for contested or unproven assertions; rarely qualifies uncertainty or alternative explanations.
• Fact accuracy and pattern of errors
  • Contains episodes where factual claims were contradicted by later reporting or independent fact-checks (e.g., misattributed photos/videos, inaccurate timelines, misleading use of imagery).
  • Mixes accurate background facts with speculative leaps; this pattern makes it hard for readers to separate true from false without external checking.
• Expertise and transparency
  • Brian Berletic presents as an independent commentator; professional credentials for investigative reporting or subject-matter expertise are limited or not documented.
  • Editorial process, corrections policy, and disclosure of funding/affiliations are opaque or minimal.
• Use of sources and citation practice
  • Videos often cite other partisan outlets, niche commentators, or curated social-media material rather than primary records or multiple independent outlets.
  • Citations, when present, may lack timestamps/links for verification.

Typical rhetorical techniques observed

• Cherry-picking incidents to support a broad thesis.
• Connecting disparate events into grand narratives without clear causal evidence.
• Emphasizing anomalies and alleged cover-ups while discounting mainstream explanations.
• Repeating narratives that align with particular geopolitical perspectives (e.g., strong skepticism toward Western institutions and support for narratives sympathetic to certain state actors).

When the channel can be useful

• For perspective: illustrates a particular political/geostrategic viewpoint and the arguments used by some alternative-media circles.
• As a lead generator: may surface documents or incidents worth checking; treat them as tips to be verified, not conclusions.
• For media literacy: useful as a case study in how persuasive storytelling and selective evidence construction work.

How to evaluate his claims quickly

1. Check primary sources cited (official statements, court documents, original videos/photos).
2. Look for corroboration from multiple independent reputable outlets.
3. Consult subject-matter experts or fact-check organizations for contested technical claims.
4. Reverse-image-search photos/videos to verify provenance and timestamps.
5. Compare framing: does mainstream reporting contradict key timelines, context, or motivations presented?

Bottom line
Use The New Atlas as a source of perspective or investigatory leads, not as a standalone authority. Treat its outputs as interpretive commentary with a consistent ideological bent; verify any factual claim through independent, credible sources before accepting or sharing it.

 

[JGalt]

Worthwhile video making the case that Israel is just one of America's tools for world domination and the USA is not under the thumb of the Jews as is popularly thought. He makes a very good case for his presentation.

Video Description:

The US can continue existing as a rapacious empire with or without Israel - it surely did fine for almost 2 centuries before Israel was created out of thin air by the Anglo-Americans - but the crimes of Israel would be impossible without US empire behind it. Israel is not blameless. Blame it for its role in facilitating Western empire up to and including abetting genocide and wars of aggression. But do not blame it for "corrupting" something that was never wholesome to begin with.


View attachment 1229650

Not necessarily a "tool" of the US, but a strategic partner, serving to protect western values in a land that's still stuck in medieval times.