USSC Justice Denies Constitutionaql Right To Face One's Accuser - Challenged

[easyt65]

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

 

[Dekster]

Like it is a big secret.

 

[wamose]

Roberts seems to be short on judgement. We'll need to replace Ginsburg to get a true Republican majority. Bush was a disaster in so many ways. He's lucky Obama came along and took his title of worst President ever.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

What's he plan if the Senate calls the whistleblower as a witness? Throw a bag over his head?

 

[The Original Tree]

It’s the strangest thing I’ve ever seen.

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

 

[The Original Tree]

Regarding witnesses The Dems screwed themselves with how they handled things in The House.

17 Dem Witnesses to 0 GOP & Denial of Due Process.

And then 3-1 in the other committee

That is a 20-1 Bias for The DemNazis.

So based on that if you want retry the House Trial, The Dems get 1 Witness and GOP 20.

 

[B. Kidd]

What's he plan if the Senate calls the whistleblower as a witness? Throw a bag over his head?

It may be time to break out the hipwaders.

Popcorn is runnin' out......

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip and find a reason to arrest someone, does that person get to find out who called the hotline and face you in court?

 

[The Original Tree]

Senator Rand Paul
@RandPaul

My exact question was: Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together

And are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip and find a reason to arrest someone, does that person get to find out who called the hotline and face you in court?

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip

Is that what the "whistleblower" did?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip and find a reason to arrest someone, does that person get to find out who called the hotline and face you in court?

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip

Is that what the "whistleblower" did?

more or less.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The 'Whistle Blower' is at the CORE of the Impeachment because it was the Whistle Blower who submitted the complaint that began the entire Impeachment process, led by D-Adam Schiff.

KEY FACTS:
- The 'Whistle Blower' does not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' according to the actual 'Whistle Blower Law'

- The 'Whistle Blower' was reported to be a partisan who used to work for Biden

- The 'Whistle Blower' had NO 1st-hand account information, only HEARSAY

- The 'Whistle Blower''s complaint was reviewed by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ and DISMISSED for no crime, no evidence, and no witnesses

- The IC IG changed the 'Whistle Blower' rules to allow the complaint to go straight to Schiff

- The IC IG now works for D-Adam Schiff

- D-Schiff had contact with the 'Whistle Blower', making him a 'Contact Witness', but refused to Recuse himself


It is peculiar that the USSC Justice, moderating / overseeing the Senate Impeachment. would shield the 'Whistle Blower's identity when doing so denies an American citizen the right to face their accuser...

....especially when the Whistle blower LAW does NOT afford a QUALIFYING 'Whistle Blower'...which Schiff's 'Whistle Blower' is NOT...anonymity or immunity!


Senator Paul seems extremely adamant about pushing this issue and forcing the identity of the admitted biased whistle blower to become public and forcing them to answer some important questions.





Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue


.

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip and find a reason to arrest someone, does that person get to find out who called the hotline and face you in court?

If you call the police tip hotline and they follow through on your tip

Is that what the "whistleblower" did?

more or less.

More.