US Population growth since 1970

1752492719929.webp
 
Hard to believe....A 1/3+ increase in the US population in just 55 years. This can't be healthy if the trend continues.

1970....203,392,031

2025....343,603,404

The most population growth in the US since 1970 has been in the South and West, with the South experiencing the largest increases in population.
Back then about 96% of the population was born in the USA and most men could financially support their family. Now less than 86% were born here and most mothers have to get a job to make ends meet.
 
Last edited:
140 million immigrants, most likely. We sure aren't making more babies, thanks to the popularity of LGBT and transgenderism.
Maybe the globalists who are fixated on lowering population levels to supposedly save the planet want all the immigrants to enter the US where they will be taught to abort their children and/or have their children change genders or be exposed to all the wonderful toxins in American food that has led to a health crisis with such things as diabetes and obesity so they can kill them all off in a kinder gentler way than the death camps of Nazi Germany.
 
I keeps seeing charts like that but the results are plain to see everywhere you look. Shit-tons of more people than when I was a teen in 1970.

I'm sure there are depopulated rust belt areas up north but I don't live there and don't see it as much of a balance.

My town:

1752495467490.webp
 
Lib explosion. Libs ain´t good in reproducing, thus cons will breed.
If you're only having 2 kids you get zero population growth.

If you're only buggering each other you have negative growth.

The only positive population growth we've had is immigrants and whatever they produce.

But that's been the way in America for over 200 years.
 
15th post
If you're only having 2 kids you get zero population growth.

If you're only buggering each other you have negative growth.

The only positive population growth we've had is immigrants and whatever they produce.

But that's been the way in America for over 200 years.


Until the modern era, the native born population was having more than replacement level kids.

Thus, we had population growth, even not counting the immigration, which was often strictly controlled.
 
Until the modern era, the native born population was having more than replacement level kids.

Thus, we had population growth, even not counting the immigration, which was often strictly controlled.
Only having 2 kids only replaces the parents.
Most of our growth is thru immigration.
 
Europe and Japan are both seeing negative birth rates, what jumps the global average are third world regions like Africa and the Middle East.
 
If you're only having 2 kids you get zero population growth.

If you're only buggering each other you have negative growth.

The only positive population growth we've had is immigrants and whatever they produce.

But that's been the way in America for over 200 years.
The US birth rate is half of what it has been in 1950:

 
Back
Top Bottom