Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
I should say they recognize the 30-day clock already in the law.
The Supreme Court installed a tighter timeline for removable migrants to challenge their deportations as part of its decision on Thursday in a case involving a Jamaican immigrant who had tried to avoid being sent back to his home country.
The Supreme Court found that once migrants receive a final order of removal, a 30-day window for them to seek review of that order is triggered.
The ruling was roughly 5-4, with the three liberal justices dissenting and Justice Neil Gorsuch joining most of the dissent.
www.foxnews.com
Essentially, Mr. Pierre Riley, a Jamaican drug dealer, overstayed a visa by almost three decades, was ordered deported and appealed. But he missed a deadline to appeal, so he lost the opportunity. Now he can go home where he surely belongs.
You can read more about the particulars of the individual whose case led to this ruling, either at the Foxnews link or here:
www.courthousenews.com
Riley entered the United States on a tourist visa in 1995 and has remained since. He later joined a “far-reaching and well-organized” drug trafficking gang and was convicted in 2008 for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute over 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, as well as possession of a firearm. Riley was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
In 2021, a federal district judge ordered a compassionate release due to Riley’s Type 2 diabetes and the Covid-19 pandemic’s heightened risk for his health.
Interestingly, the case that was appealed to the USSC was argued by Merrick Garland in favor of Riley's deportation. That was during the election year, when Team Biden were pretending to be these dedicated deporters:
law.justia.com
Deportations, with their endless appeals, have turned into the new Death Penalty. So desparate are Democrats to avoid either, that they are willing to clog the courts with costly appeals for each individual case.
Now, this should be streamlined as required by the law cited by both Garland and the Majority in the USSC.
THE LAW, that the left has suddenly become so fond of.
I just have to wonder if the liberal justices would have gone along if it had been Garland who argued against the appeal to the USSC.
The Supreme Court installed a tighter timeline for removable migrants to challenge their deportations as part of its decision on Thursday in a case involving a Jamaican immigrant who had tried to avoid being sent back to his home country.
The Supreme Court found that once migrants receive a final order of removal, a 30-day window for them to seek review of that order is triggered.
The ruling was roughly 5-4, with the three liberal justices dissenting and Justice Neil Gorsuch joining most of the dissent.
Supreme Court sides against migrant in deportation case
A new Supreme Court ruling requires migrants to appeal removal within 30 days, complicating cases for those like Pierre Riley who fear torture if deported.
www.foxnews.com
Essentially, Mr. Pierre Riley, a Jamaican drug dealer, overstayed a visa by almost three decades, was ordered deported and appealed. But he missed a deadline to appeal, so he lost the opportunity. Now he can go home where he surely belongs.
You can read more about the particulars of the individual whose case led to this ruling, either at the Foxnews link or here:
Supreme Court narrows window for immigrants to challenge deportation orders
A Jamaican immigrant is trying to challenge his removal over fears he could be tortured by a drug kingpin who has already killed two of his cousins.
www.courthousenews.com
Riley entered the United States on a tourist visa in 1995 and has remained since. He later joined a “far-reaching and well-organized” drug trafficking gang and was convicted in 2008 for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute over 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, as well as possession of a firearm. Riley was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
In 2021, a federal district judge ordered a compassionate release due to Riley’s Type 2 diabetes and the Covid-19 pandemic’s heightened risk for his health.
Interestingly, the case that was appealed to the USSC was argued by Merrick Garland in favor of Riley's deportation. That was during the election year, when Team Biden were pretending to be these dedicated deporters:
Pierre Riley v. Merrick Garland, No. 22-1609 (4th Cir. 2024)
Pierre Riley v. Merrick Garland, No. 22-1609 (4th Cir. 2024) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
law.justia.com
Deportations, with their endless appeals, have turned into the new Death Penalty. So desparate are Democrats to avoid either, that they are willing to clog the courts with costly appeals for each individual case.
Now, this should be streamlined as required by the law cited by both Garland and the Majority in the USSC.
THE LAW, that the left has suddenly become so fond of.
I just have to wonder if the liberal justices would have gone along if it had been Garland who argued against the appeal to the USSC.
