Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees?

[computerliker]

1- Muslimism is not experiencing single level. Each community is living the rules of Islam with their own mental rules. Level and sectarian differences bring to cool against each other.

2- Muslim societies need non-Muslim people. The majority of people who are Muslim is a Muslim person and the people with different religious ideologies must be settled.

3- Muslim countries have serious levels of problems. (political - democratic - economic - efficiency) . In successful Muslim countries, important studies come from the studies of foreign people from the world. This is of course the success of globalism. Globalism is perceived as profanity but is a logical ideology.

 

[surada]

1- Muslimism is not experiencing single level. Each community is living the rules of Islam with their own mental rules. Level and sectarian differences bring to cool against each other.

2- Muslim societies need non-Muslim people. The majority of people who are Muslim is a Muslim person and the people with different religious ideologies must be settled.

3- Muslim countries have serious levels of problems. (political - democratic - economic - efficiency) . In successful Muslim countries, important studies come from the studies of foreign people from the world. This is of course the success of globalism. Globalism is perceived as profanity but is a logical ideology.

Really? Where do you live in the Muslim world?

 

[Independentthinker]

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees?​

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees? - The New American

As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked: Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”...

thenewamerican.com

25 Aug 2021 ~~ By Selwyn Duke
As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked:
Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”
Actually, it’s long past time. This is why I’ve actually been asking the above question for years in response to 2015’s wave of Mideast migration into Europe. The “rich, sparsely populated Gulf States such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai, and the UAE are not accepting their supposedly desperate coreligionists,” I wrote in 2018, for example. “Why are these Muslims shipped thousands of miles into the heart of erstwhile Christendom?”
Making its case, American Thinker (AT) points out that while “Afghanistan is a Muslim country, the Taliban’s extreme approach to interpreting Islam makes it an outlier even by the standards of other Muslim countries.” So considering “the severe oppression many Muslims themselves will experience under Taliban reign,” AT continues, shouldn’t Islamic countries come to the rescue?
AT then mentions that “Afghanistan isn’t alone as a country where Muslims are oppressed. The Chinese Communist Party rounded up the Uyghur people and placed them in camps,” for example.
~Snip~
(Im)migration really is a numbers game, too. Consider: The rare Muslim who contemplated going to the West many decades ago had to be a different kind of Muslim, one who understood he was entering a Christian culture that wouldn’t cater to his desires. He and his co-religionists would be so few and far between there’d be no prospect for “Halal” groceries, Islamic interest-free financing, or Muslim schools for his children. So he’d be forced to assimilate by having to work within the host nation’s established institutions. But great numbers of Muslim immigrants will form their own enclaves and their own institutions; this reality not only makes the journey west more inviting to zealous Muslims, but also enables them to reinforce each other’s beliefs.
And what are those beliefs? A 2013 Pew Research Center survey found that 99 percent of Afghans want Sharia as the official law of the land and that 61 percent state it should apply to non-Muslims as well, that 79 percent believe leaving Islam warrants the death penalty, and that 40 percent say suicide bombings are justified “in order to defend Islam against its enemies.”
And why wouldn’t they say that? Seventy-three percent of Afghans believe Sharia is the revealed word of God.
Assimilate that.


Comment:
My guess is the Bai Dung admin wants to get them in before the 2022 mid-term elections and settled in red states as quickly as possible.
They're being registered as Democrats on the way here.

Excellent question.

 

[surada]

Excellent question.

Based on serious ignorance... Muslim countries are NOT signatories to the UNHRC for obvious reasons, but they have always taken in refugees.. Turkey has taken in several million. So have the Gulf States.. Syria did until their country was shattered by drought and civil war.. Lebanon also takes in refugees.

 

[Asclepias]

This isn’t about aiding or building a country. It’s about Muslims helping Muslims. Then again, the US has helped many Muslim countries and that caused bin Lasen to lose his shit and have planes crash into NYC, DC, and PA.

There are different kinds of Muslims. Maybe they dont like Afghanis version of Islam?

 

[surada]

There are different kinds of Muslims. Maybe they dont like Afghanis version of Islam?

The Gulf States have taken in millions of refugees from Yemen and Syria.. Before that they took in Iraqi refugees twice.

Do you expect them to take in refugees every time the US has a misadventure?

 

[Crepitus]

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees?​

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees? - The New American

As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked: Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”...

thenewamerican.com

25 Aug 2021 ~~ By Selwyn Duke
As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked:
Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”
Actually, it’s long past time. This is why I’ve actually been asking the above question for years in response to 2015’s wave of Mideast migration into Europe. The “rich, sparsely populated Gulf States such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai, and the UAE are not accepting their supposedly desperate coreligionists,” I wrote in 2018, for example. “Why are these Muslims shipped thousands of miles into the heart of erstwhile Christendom?”
Making its case, American Thinker (AT) points out that while “Afghanistan is a Muslim country, the Taliban’s extreme approach to interpreting Islam makes it an outlier even by the standards of other Muslim countries.” So considering “the severe oppression many Muslims themselves will experience under Taliban reign,” AT continues, shouldn’t Islamic countries come to the rescue?
AT then mentions that “Afghanistan isn’t alone as a country where Muslims are oppressed. The Chinese Communist Party rounded up the Uyghur people and placed them in camps,” for example.
~Snip~
(Im)migration really is a numbers game, too. Consider: The rare Muslim who contemplated going to the West many decades ago had to be a different kind of Muslim, one who understood he was entering a Christian culture that wouldn’t cater to his desires. He and his co-religionists would be so few and far between there’d be no prospect for “Halal” groceries, Islamic interest-free financing, or Muslim schools for his children. So he’d be forced to assimilate by having to work within the host nation’s established institutions. But great numbers of Muslim immigrants will form their own enclaves and their own institutions; this reality not only makes the journey west more inviting to zealous Muslims, but also enables them to reinforce each other’s beliefs.
And what are those beliefs? A 2013 Pew Research Center survey found that 99 percent of Afghans want Sharia as the official law of the land and that 61 percent state it should apply to non-Muslims as well, that 79 percent believe leaving Islam warrants the death penalty, and that 40 percent say suicide bombings are justified “in order to defend Islam against its enemies.”
And why wouldn’t they say that? Seventy-three percent of Afghans believe Sharia is the revealed word of God.
Assimilate that.


Comment:
My guess is the Bai Dung admin wants to get them in before the 2022 mid-term elections and settled in red states as quickly as possible.
They're being registered as Democrats on the way here.

So you think maybe Pakistan is buhdist?

 

[surada]

So you think maybe Pakistan is buhdist?

Pakistan has taken in over a million Afghans.

 

[Crepitus]

Pakistan has taken in over a million Afghans.

All of the surrounding Muslim countries have Afghan refugees.

 

[surada]

All of the surrounding Muslim countries have Afghan refugees.

They don't call them refugees. They call them "Brothers in Distress".

 

[Crepitus]

They don't call them refugees. They call them "Brothers in Distress".

I suspect they call them a pain in the butt, there's been sooo much of that over there the last couple of decades.

 

[surada]

I suspect they call them a pain in the butt, there's been sooo much of that over there the last couple of decades.

I don't think they are housed in refugee camps, but in the economy where they can have jobs and send their kids to school.

 

[Coyote]

Based on serious ignorance... Muslim countries are NOT signatories to the UNHRC for obvious reasons, but they have always taken in refugees.. Turkey has taken in several million. So have the Gulf States.. Syria did until their country was shattered by drought and civil war.. Lebanon also takes in refugees.

And many of them are overwhelmed, with far fewer resources than countries like us who have taken an embarressingly tiny number of refugees in recent years.

 

[surada]

And many of them are overwhelmed, with far fewer resources than countries like us who have taken an embarressingly tiny number of refugees in recent years.

US policy often creates refugees and we expect other countries to pick up the slack.

 

[Crepitus]

I don't think they are housed in refugee camps, but in the economy where they can have jobs and send their kids to school.

Many have relatives in the neighboring countries to stay with.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees?​

Unasked, Obvious Question: Why Aren’t MUSLIM Countries Taking the Afghan Refugees? - The New American

As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked: Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”...

thenewamerican.com

25 Aug 2021 ~~ By Selwyn Duke
As Joe Biden “takes a knee to the Taliban” and it has been suggested that we absorb millions of Afghan migrants, a simple question is largely unasked:
Why aren’t Muslim countries “stepping forward to take care of their co-religionists”? as American Thinker puts it. “Isn’t it time they did?”
Actually, it’s long past time. This is why I’ve actually been asking the above question for years in response to 2015’s wave of Mideast migration into Europe. The “rich, sparsely populated Gulf States such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai, and the UAE are not accepting their supposedly desperate coreligionists,” I wrote in 2018, for example. “Why are these Muslims shipped thousands of miles into the heart of erstwhile Christendom?”
Making its case, American Thinker (AT) points out that while “Afghanistan is a Muslim country, the Taliban’s extreme approach to interpreting Islam makes it an outlier even by the standards of other Muslim countries.” So considering “the severe oppression many Muslims themselves will experience under Taliban reign,” AT continues, shouldn’t Islamic countries come to the rescue?
AT then mentions that “Afghanistan isn’t alone as a country where Muslims are oppressed. The Chinese Communist Party rounded up the Uyghur people and placed them in camps,” for example.
~Snip~
(Im)migration really is a numbers game, too. Consider: The rare Muslim who contemplated going to the West many decades ago had to be a different kind of Muslim, one who understood he was entering a Christian culture that wouldn’t cater to his desires. He and his co-religionists would be so few and far between there’d be no prospect for “Halal” groceries, Islamic interest-free financing, or Muslim schools for his children. So he’d be forced to assimilate by having to work within the host nation’s established institutions. But great numbers of Muslim immigrants will form their own enclaves and their own institutions; this reality not only makes the journey west more inviting to zealous Muslims, but also enables them to reinforce each other’s beliefs.
And what are those beliefs? A 2013 Pew Research Center survey found that 99 percent of Afghans want Sharia as the official law of the land and that 61 percent state it should apply to non-Muslims as well, that 79 percent believe leaving Islam warrants the death penalty, and that 40 percent say suicide bombings are justified “in order to defend Islam against its enemies.”
And why wouldn’t they say that? Seventy-three percent of Afghans believe Sharia is the revealed word of God.
Assimilate that.


Comment:
My guess is the Bai Dung admin wants to get them in before the 2022 mid-term elections and settled in red states as quickly as possible.
They're being registered as Democrats on the way here.

Another article by an ignorant jackass, written for ignorant jackasses. The vast majority of Afghani refugees have gone and go to Iran and Pakistan. You really have a knack for finding the worst pile of shit articles on the internet. And for gobbling them right up, of course.

 

[Doc7505]

Pakistan has taken in over a million Afghans.

Yes, they gave them safe haven, medical assistance for the wounded and resupplied them with munitions, especially explosives for EID's. Why they even supplied them with volunteers to help in the fight.

Pak ‘jihadis’ join Taliban ranks, return as dead bodies - Times of India

Pakistan News: Dozens of Pakistanis have been killed in Afghanistan in the past few months while fighting alongside the Taliban against the Afghan forces. Hundreds o

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

**********​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/18/pakistan-hand-taliban-victory/

 

[surada]

Yes, they gave them safe haven, medical assistance for the wounded and resupplied them with munitions, especially explosives for EID's. Why they even supplied them with volunteers to help in the fight.

Pak ‘jihadis’ join Taliban ranks, return as dead bodies - Times of India

Pakistan News: Dozens of Pakistanis have been killed in Afghanistan in the past few months while fighting alongside the Taliban against the Afghan forces. Hundreds o

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

**********​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/18/pakistan-hand-taliban-victory/

Most are families with women and children and elderly parents.

 

[LeftofLeft]

There are different kinds of Muslims. Maybe they dont like Afghanis version of Islam?

Maybe yet another case for Muslims having no level of tolerance for diversity.,

 

[Coyote]

Maybe yet another case for Muslims having no level of tolerance for diversity.,

Most religions don’t.