U.S. Says Sheriff Could Face Prosecution for Releasing Immigrant

[Failzero]

Under what law?

Federal Immigration Law ?

 

[otto105]

Federal Immigration Law ?

Are local sheriffs federal employees?

 

[Failzero]

Under what law?

Chicago Politicians are allowing Illegal Criminals in Jails & Prisons to quickly legally Change their names now to avoid deportation

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dont most police profess to PROTECT AND SERVE THE PUBLIC?

How does releasing a VIOLENT CRIMINAL ALIEN do this?

 

[Failzero]

Are local sheriffs federal employees?

No but most of them are not Blindly following Anti Colonialist open borders Marxist Leftists .

 

[ColonelAngus]

Are local sheriffs federal employees?

Are local sheriffs supposed to PROTECT AND SERVE THE PUBLIC?

You fucking lunatic.

Illegal immigrant in Texas wanted for allegedly raping child in Mexico repatriated back to native country

An illegal immigrant wanted in Mexico for allegedly raping a child was repatriated back to his country after entering the U.S. four times illegally since 2002.

www.foxnews.com

Your TDS is off the charts. I sure hope no one you know is ever accosted by a violent illegal.

 

[Mac-7]

If there is no law to hold them accountable under, how will they do it? The local sheriff is not responsible for immigration enforcement.

I wish I could tell you, but it remains to be seen

You are supporting a sheriff who is protecting illegal alien criminals

What a piece of shit he is

 

[otto105]

No but most of them are not Blindly following Anti Colonialist open borders Marxist Leftists .

What does that conservabonics sentence mean?

 

[Failzero]

What does that conservabonics sentence mean?

It means Most US Sheriffs are not Democrats or rabid leftists ( even in California )

 

[otto105]

It means Most US Sheriffs are not Democrats or rabid leftists ( even in California )

Which is supposed to mean what?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Where does the constitution say that?

Ewe Essay

We, the people, determine what government can do, not some ignorant document from the horse-and-buggy era. It's about time Americans quit worshipping that elitist manifesto. They are brainwashed by the toxic ruling class to treat it like a Bible, and the Framers like the Evangelists.

Practically all the Founding Fodder were the same self-serving incompetents from the Continental Congress. Our totalitarian class implies that those tightwad traitors were all replaced by "wise stewards." They also purposely sent Thomas Jefferson off to a meaningless position in France because he was too democratic.

Another lie we're told is that Franklin's "It's a republic, if you can keep it" meant it wasn't a democracy. What he really meant was only that it wasn't a monarchy.

How can the sheep believe that the COITUS is a check on the government when only government officials are given the right to tell their bleating flocks what it means?

 

[otto105]

Ewe Essay

We, the people, determine what government can do, not some ignorant document from the horse-and-buggy era. It's about time Americans quit worshipping that elitist manifesto. They are brainwashed by the toxic ruling class to treat it like a Bible, and the Framers like the Evangelists.

Practically all the Founding Fodder were the same self-serving incompetents from the Continental Congress. Our totalitarian class implies that those tightwad traitors were all replaced by "wise stewards." They also purposely sent Thomas Jefferson off to a meaningless position in France because he was too democratic.

Another lie we're told is that Franklin's "It's a republic, if you can keep it" meant it wasn't a democracy. What he really meant was only that it wasn't a monarchy.

How can the sheep believe that the COITUS is a check on the government when only government officials are given the right to tell their bleating flocks what it means?

Holy vocabulary, diarrhea

 

[Failzero]

Which is supposed to mean what?

Conservative Constitutionalist Sheriffs will support Trump in his endeavors

 

[otto105]

Conservative Constitutionalist Sheriffs will support Trump in his endeavors

Yeah, in rural red taker country.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Nope. Local law enforcement does not remove criminal aliens. Never have. Never will.

That is not what this story is about.

Stop making shit up.

Treason Has No Separate Jurisdiction

As stupid and collusive as cops not busting drug dealers because "That's the federal DEA's job."

 

[Marener]

Treason Has No Separate Jurisdiction

As stupid and collusive as cops not busting drug dealers because "That's the federal DEA's job."

Last time I checked, there were state laws against dealing drugs and the vast majority of drug deals are handled in the state level.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Q: So, if a sheriff refuses to comply with an order, is he breaking the law?

A: If a sheriff refuses to comply with a federal court order, including a removal order:

• Yes, legally speaking, the sheriff would be breaking the law. Here's why:

1. Federal Court Authority: Federal courts have the power to issue orders that are binding on all within their jurisdiction, including state and local officials like sheriffs.
2. Supremacy Clause: Under the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause, federal law, including court orders, takes precedence over state law or local policy. A refusal to comply with a federal court order would be a direct conflict with this clause.
3. Contempt of Court: Refusal to comply with a federal court order can lead to contempt charges. Federal courts have inherent authority to punish contempt, which can result in fines or imprisonment for the individual official involved.
4. Statutory Violations:
   • 18 U.S.C. § 401 allows federal courts to punish contempt of their authority.
   • 18 U.S.C. § 242 criminalizes the deprivation of rights under color of law, which could apply if the refusal to comply with a court order directly impacts someone's legal rights.
5. Oath of Office: Sheriffs, like all law enforcement officers, swear an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States. Refusal to comply with a federal court order could be seen as a violation of this oath.

----

Looking at you, Marener.

Roadrunner Justice. Beep, Beep!

To set an example, Trump has to order the imprisonment of this Coyote Sheriff. Let the
quisling lawyers try to break him out by force, not by the order of their quisling judges. which should be ignored just like the Ayatollahs' fatwas are.

 

[Foxfyre]

He should be stripped of his authority and sent to jail. These people are traitors.




“The Justice Department called for an investigation of a sheriff in Ithaca, N.Y., who had released an undocumented man who was later arrested by federal agents.”

U.S. Says Sheriff Could Face Prosecution for Releasing Immigrant

The Justice Department called for an investigation of a sheriff in Ithaca, N.Y., who had released an undocumented man who was later arrested by federal agents.

www.nytimes.com

That's what it is going to take I think. These 'woke' officials who were aided and abetted by Biden's administration are in notice that there is a real new sheriff in town and catch and release of illegals is no longer an option for anybody.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

It's been 2 weeks and Trump is already using the DoJ to persecute good Americans whom he doesn't like.

A Mandate to Be Wilier Than the Coyote Clique

Unlike his first Administration, which was exploratory, DJT has learned to openly violate the ineffective judicial-review way things were done in the past. He has to play brinkmanship and defiantly provoke impeachment, which the traitors did anyway when he appeased them.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I dont like Sheriff either

He’s lucky be in a very liberal corner on a very liberal state

So he may get away with it in the end

We’ll just launch a few arrows at him and see what sticks to the unAmerican SOB

Even More Necessary to Defoliate the Ivy League