Obviously, the Proud Boys who were convicted weren't defending themselves.
So now defending yourself against a pursuing mob that caught you is not defending yourself? lol
The court heard the EVIDENCE, not Jim's one sided and probably half made up story (I base the made-up part on his theory that the prosecutor is also Antifa).
No, the jury heard that as well, and I am not claiming that the prosecutors are Antifa, I am saying it is likely they KNOW THE ANTIFA MEMBERS PERSONALLY.
There was a rumble. Some folks in the Proud Boys and in Antifa were happy to fight, no self-defense involved.
Because being chased down and attacked is just a situation that screams equivalence all over it. roflmao
The Proud Boys were so guilty the defense wouldn't even put them on the stand. Does that tell you anything?
Yeah, tells me that they saw no advantage in putting them on the stand.
OP needs to quit whining.
Yeah, Rosa Parks was such a whiner, too, lol.
If you go to "mix it up" with folks and you actually do, you MIGHT get caught.
They were not 'going to mix it up with Antifa.
Did you even read the article, OldLady?
PB was having a meeting at a bar. Antifa attacked the bar the night before because of the planned meeting and threatened to kill those that attend the meeting.
The next night Antifa show up doing their normal threats, busting things, and attacking people that got in their way. The PB try to sneak out a back way, but Antifa caught them and attacked like mobs often do, first surrounding, then taunting then throwing things like rocks and bottles because deep down they are still basically just cowards. Then PB defended themselves by trying to fight their way through the attacking mob.
It is all right there in the article. All you have to do is read the article, picture it in your mind and figger it out.
Not that hard, really.
But to tell the complete Truth, I doubt you have even read this whole response I am writing to you. Your mind is made up, and closed for business.